Consequences from passing bad laws

[funjumper101 15]

"Religious Freedom" laws are a means to allow people to discriminate against those people that the so called "religious" believers find offensive. These laws are open to interpretation and abuse as they are poorly written and have serious unintended consequences.

The blowback of unintended consequences begins.

http://www.sfchronicle.com/news/us/article/Sex-offenders-cite-religious-objections-law-in-6363038.php

It is totally moronic that there are restrictions on where convicted sex offenders may reside, while there are no restrictions of the residences of convicted rapists, murderers, or those convicted of violent assault. Once again the Reich Wing way of thinking shows its total absurdity.

[yoink 321]

funjumper101

Once again the Reich Wing way of thinking shows its total absurdity.

You know that you lose all credulity when you say stuff like this, right? Sorry, reich?

[BartsDaddy 7]

Yep because only republicans voted for the sex offender list and laws. and in this day I would think most rapists are on the sex offender list, the ones that have been caught at least..
Now go look for something else to slam the Reich Wing

Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

[Anvilbrother 0]

Well there is the 613 illegal immigrants sex offenders that was released because their country did not want them back. After holding them for 6 months the administration let them go, and no one knows where they are.

Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along,

[DanG 1]

Source?

- Dan G

[Anvilbrother 0]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/15/us-releases-illegals-who-are-sex-offenders/?page=all
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/06/13/ice-freed-sex-offenders-often-without-notifying-states/v14qAOXKUOqAtaFeKGeGWI/story.html

Im trying to find a site that indicated the 600+ number that WJBO talked about on the radio. Let me keep looking, but this describes what's going on with that.

Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along,

[DanG 1]

Thanks, but you greatly simplified the problem. ICE released them because the Supreme Court said they have to. Where ICE fucked up is in not always following up with local authorities to make sure the offenders register as sex offenders.

It's bad, but it's not like Obama is ordering ICE to release sex offenders.

- Dan G

[turtlespeed 226]

funjumper101

"Religious Freedom" laws are a means to allow people to discriminate against those people that the so called "religious" believers find offensive. These laws are open to interpretation and abuse as they are poorly written and have serious unintended consequences.

The blowback of unintended consequences begins.

http://www.sfchronicle.com/news/us/article/Sex-offenders-cite-religious-objections-law-in-6363038.php

It is totally moronic that there are restrictions on where convicted sex offenders may reside, while there are no restrictions of the residences of convicted rapists, murderers, or those convicted of violent assault. Once again the Reich Wing way of thinking shows its total absurdity.

Do you even fucking have any clue whatsoever about anything that you type on here?

Seriously, when the fuck was RAPE ever classified as anything BUT a sexual of fence?

Go study something and let us know when you gain some specific knowledge, reich now.

You also need to relax your black and white view of things.

I know at least two guys that have to register for being a sex offender, because they had a few drinks and needed to relieve themselves in an alley. Yep, register for taking a piss.

Now go crawl back under your extremist lefty rock, you embarrass the rest of the humans on the planet.


Face palm.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[lawrocket 3]

You end up with the ACA.

My wife is hotter than your wife.

[funjumper101 15]

turtlespeed

***"Religious Freedom" laws are a means to allow people to discriminate against those people that the so called "religious" believers find offensive. These laws are open to interpretation and abuse as they are poorly written and have serious unintended consequences.

The blowback of unintended consequences begins.

http://www.sfchronicle.com/news/us/article/Sex-offenders-cite-religious-objections-law-in-6363038.php

It is totally moronic that there are restrictions on where convicted sex offenders may reside, while there are no restrictions of the residences of convicted rapists, murderers, or those convicted of violent assault. Once again the Reich Wing way of thinking shows its total absurdity.

Do you even fucking have any clue whatsoever about anything that you type on here?

Seriously, when the fuck was RAPE ever classified as anything BUT a sexual of fence?

Go study something and let us know when you gain some specific knowledge, reich now.

You also need to relax your black and white view of things.

I know at least two guys that have to register for being a sex offender, because they had a few drinks and needed to relieve themselves in an alley. Yep, register for taking a piss.

Now go crawl back under your extremist lefty rock, you embarrass the rest of the humans on the planet.


Face palm.

I know exactly what I post here. Factual information that makes the ill informed Reich Wingers pissy because the facts do not support their BELIEFS.

The "sex offender" registries have done zero to increase public safety. The broad scope of "sex offenses", IE, public urination being a "sex offense" is totally ridiculous.

It is a FACT that there are ZERO restrictions anywhere in the USA for the location of residences of convicted murderers, rapists, and violent felons. The only residency restrictions that have been put into place are for "sex offenders".
It cracks me up when I read "Letters to the Editor" in the local new publications and their online offerings, from numbskulls that write how they couldn't STAND the thought of living next door to a murderer, a rapist, or a violent felon. The writer is blissfully unaware that there are NO RESTRICTIONS on where those criminals can live, which makes their letter utterly ridiculous.

[turtlespeed 226]

funjumper101

******"Religious Freedom" laws are a means to allow people to discriminate against those people that the so called "religious" believers find offensive. These laws are open to interpretation and abuse as they are poorly written and have serious unintended consequences.

The blowback of unintended consequences begins.

http://www.sfchronicle.com/news/us/article/Sex-offenders-cite-religious-objections-law-in-6363038.php

It is totally moronic that there are restrictions on where convicted sex offenders may reside, while there are no restrictions of the residences of convicted rapists, murderers, or those convicted of violent assault. Once again the Reich Wing way of thinking shows its total absurdity.

Do you even fucking have any clue whatsoever about anything that you type on here?

Seriously, when the fuck was RAPE ever classified as anything BUT a sexual of fence?

Go study something and let us know when you gain some specific knowledge, reich now.

You also need to relax your black and white view of things.

I know at least two guys that have to register for being a sex offender, because they had a few drinks and needed to relieve themselves in an alley. Yep, register for taking a piss.

Now go crawl back under your extremist lefty rock, you embarrass the rest of the humans on the planet.


Face palm.

I know exactly what I post here. Factual information that makes the ill informed Reich Wingers pissy because the facts do not support their BELIEFS.

The "sex offender" registries have done zero to increase public safety. The broad scope of "sex offenses", IE, public urination being a "sex offense" is totally ridiculous.

It is a FACT that there are ZERO restrictions anywhere in the USA for the location of residences of convicted murderers, rapists, and violent felons. The only residency restrictions that have been put into place are for "sex offenders".
It cracks me up when I read "Letters to the Editor" in the local new publications and their online offerings, from numbskulls that write how they couldn't STAND the thought of living next door to a murderer, a rapist, or a violent felon. The writer is blissfully unaware that there are NO RESTRICTIONS on where those criminals can live, which makes their letter utterly ridiculous.

OK, so please post a factual response where rape is not a sex offence.
You know nothing John Snow

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[Amazon 7]

turtlespeed

*********"Religious Freedom" laws are a means to allow people to discriminate against those people that the so called "religious" believers find offensive. These laws are open to interpretation and abuse as they are poorly written and have serious unintended consequences.

The blowback of unintended consequences begins.

http://www.sfchronicle.com/news/us/article/Sex-offenders-cite-religious-objections-law-in-6363038.php

It is totally moronic that there are restrictions on where convicted sex offenders may reside, while there are no restrictions of the residences of convicted rapists, murderers, or those convicted of violent assault. Once again the Reich Wing way of thinking shows its total absurdity.

Do you even fucking have any clue whatsoever about anything that you type on here?

Seriously, when the fuck was RAPE ever classified as anything BUT a sexual of fence?

Go study something and let us know when you gain some specific knowledge, reich now.

You also need to relax your black and white view of things.

I know at least two guys that have to register for being a sex offender, because they had a few drinks and needed to relieve themselves in an alley. Yep, register for taking a piss.

Now go crawl back under your extremist lefty rock, you embarrass the rest of the humans on the planet.


Face palm.

I know exactly what I post here. Factual information that makes the ill informed Reich Wingers pissy because the facts do not support their BELIEFS.

The "sex offender" registries have done zero to increase public safety. The broad scope of "sex offenses", IE, public urination being a "sex offense" is totally ridiculous.

It is a FACT that there are ZERO restrictions anywhere in the USA for the location of residences of convicted murderers, rapists, and violent felons. The only residency restrictions that have been put into place are for "sex offenders".
It cracks me up when I read "Letters to the Editor" in the local new publications and their online offerings, from numbskulls that write how they couldn't STAND the thought of living next door to a murderer, a rapist, or a violent felon. The writer is blissfully unaware that there are NO RESTRICTIONS on where those criminals can live, which makes their letter utterly ridiculous.

OK, so please post a factual response where rape is not a sex offence.
You know nothing John Snow


A GOP convention???

Richard Mourdock, Republican Senate candidate from Indiana, who has not retracted his debate remark that a pregnancy caused by rape 'is something that God intended to happen'.

[turtlespeed 226]

Amazon

************"Religious Freedom" laws are a means to allow people to discriminate against those people that the so called "religious" believers find offensive. These laws are open to interpretation and abuse as they are poorly written and have serious unintended consequences.

The blowback of unintended consequences begins.

http://www.sfchronicle.com/news/us/article/Sex-offenders-cite-religious-objections-law-in-6363038.php

It is totally moronic that there are restrictions on where convicted sex offenders may reside, while there are no restrictions of the residences of convicted rapists, murderers, or those convicted of violent assault. Once again the Reich Wing way of thinking shows its total absurdity.

Do you even fucking have any clue whatsoever about anything that you type on here?

Seriously, when the fuck was RAPE ever classified as anything BUT a sexual of fence?

Go study something and let us know when you gain some specific knowledge, reich now.

You also need to relax your black and white view of things.



I know at least two guys that have to register for being a sex offender, because they had a few drinks and needed to relieve themselves in an alley. Yep, register for taking a piss.

Now go crawl back under your extremist lefty rock, you embarrass the rest of the humans on the planet.


Face palm.

I know exactly what I post here. Factual information that makes the ill informed Reich Wingers pissy because the facts do not support their BELIEFS.

The "sex offender" registries have done zero to increase public safety. The broad scope of "sex offenses", IE, public urination being a "sex offense" is totally ridiculous.

It is a FACT that there are ZERO restrictions anywhere in the USA for the location of residences of convicted murderers, rapists, and violent felons. The only residency restrictions that have been put into place are for "sex offenders".
It cracks me up when I read "Letters to the Editor" in the local new publications and their online offerings, from numbskulls that write how they couldn't STAND the thought of living next door to a murderer, a rapist, or a violent felon. The writer is blissfully unaware that there are NO RESTRICTIONS on where those criminals can live, which makes their letter utterly ridiculous.

OK, so please post a factual response where rape is not a sex offence.
You know nothing John Snow


A GOP convention???

Richard Mourdock, Republican Senate candidate from Indiana, who has not retracted his debate remark that a pregnancy caused by rape 'is something that God intended to happen'.

So now what an idiot says in a convention is law now. Good to know.

We needed those extra states tha Obama claims we have.

Again, where is it law that a rape is not a sexual offense? 101 claimed it, let him back it up if he has the nads to try.

I don't think he does.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[Boomerdog 0]

Quote

Once again the Reich Wing way of thinking shows its total absurdity.

And you Commie Pinko Bastards have a better idea? Let's hear it.

P.S. I think it was you I warned about using the term Reich Wing.
'Cause everytime I read "reich wing" from you or anyone else, I'm countering with "commie pinko bastard." Get used to it.

[Amazon 7]

turtlespeed

***************"Religious Freedom" laws are a means to allow people to discriminate against those people that the so called "religious" believers find offensive. These laws are open to interpretation and abuse as they are poorly written and have serious unintended consequences.

The blowback of unintended consequences begins.

http://www.sfchronicle.com/news/us/article/Sex-offenders-cite-religious-objections-law-in-6363038.php

It is totally moronic that there are restrictions on where convicted sex offenders may reside, while there are no restrictions of the residences of convicted rapists, murderers, or those convicted of violent assault. Once again the Reich Wing way of thinking shows its total absurdity.

Do you even fucking have any clue whatsoever about anything that you type on here?

Seriously, when the fuck was RAPE ever classified as anything BUT a sexual of fence?

Go study something and let us know when you gain some specific knowledge, reich now.

You also need to relax your black and white view of things.



I know at least two guys that have to register for being a sex offender, because they had a few drinks and needed to relieve themselves in an alley. Yep, register for taking a piss.

Now go crawl back under your extremist lefty rock, you embarrass the rest of the humans on the planet.


Face palm.

I know exactly what I post here. Factual information that makes the ill informed Reich Wingers pissy because the facts do not support their BELIEFS.

The "sex offender" registries have done zero to increase public safety. The broad scope of "sex offenses", IE, public urination being a "sex offense" is totally ridiculous.

It is a FACT that there are ZERO restrictions anywhere in the USA for the location of residences of convicted murderers, rapists, and violent felons. The only residency restrictions that have been put into place are for "sex offenders".
It cracks me up when I read "Letters to the Editor" in the local new publications and their online offerings, from numbskulls that write how they couldn't STAND the thought of living next door to a murderer, a rapist, or a violent felon. The writer is blissfully unaware that there are NO RESTRICTIONS on where those criminals can live, which makes their letter utterly ridiculous.

OK, so please post a factual response where rape is not a sex offence.
You know nothing John Snow


A GOP convention???

Richard Mourdock, Republican Senate candidate from Indiana, who has not retracted his debate remark that a pregnancy caused by rape 'is something that God intended to happen'.

So now what an idiot says in a convention is law now. Good to know.

We needed those extra states tha Obama claims we have.

Again, where is it law that a rape is not a sexual offense? 101 claimed it, let him back it up if he has the nads to try.

I don't think he does.


If you go on a road trip across every state in our nation and then go back thru the some of the same ones how many states did you cross.


Did you pass grade school arithmetic word problems?????

[turtlespeed 226]

Amazon

******************"Religious Freedom" laws are a means to allow people to discriminate against those people that the so called "religious" believers find offensive. These laws are open to interpretation and abuse as they are poorly written and have serious unintended consequences.

The blowback of unintended consequences begins.

http://www.sfchronicle.com/news/us/article/Sex-offenders-cite-religious-objections-law-in-6363038.php

It is totally moronic that there are restrictions on where convicted sex offenders may reside, while there are no restrictions of the residences of convicted rapists, murderers, or those convicted of violent assault. Once again the Reich Wing way of thinking shows its total absurdity.

Do you even fucking have any clue whatsoever about anything that you type on here?

Seriously, when the fuck was RAPE ever classified as anything BUT a sexual of fence?

Go study something and let us know when you gain some specific knowledge, reich now.

You also need to relax your black and white view of things.



I know at least two guys that have to register for being a sex offender, because they had a few drinks and needed to relieve themselves in an alley. Yep, register for taking a piss.

Now go crawl back under your extremist lefty rock, you embarrass the rest of the humans on the planet.


Face palm.

I know exactly what I post here. Factual information that makes the ill informed Reich Wingers pissy because the facts do not support their BELIEFS.

The "sex offender" registries have done zero to increase public safety. The broad scope of "sex offenses", IE, public urination being a "sex offense" is totally ridiculous.

It is a FACT that there are ZERO restrictions anywhere in the USA for the location of residences of convicted murderers, rapists, and violent felons. The only residency restrictions that have been put into place are for "sex offenders".
It cracks me up when I read "Letters to the Editor" in the local new publications and their online offerings, from numbskulls that write how they couldn't STAND the thought of living next door to a murderer, a rapist, or a violent felon. The writer is blissfully unaware that there are NO RESTRICTIONS on where those criminals can live, which makes their letter utterly ridiculous.

OK, so please post a factual response where rape is not a sex offence.
You know nothing John Snow


A GOP convention???

Richard Mourdock, Republican Senate candidate from Indiana, who has not retracted his debate remark that a pregnancy caused by rape 'is something that God intended to happen'.

So now what an idiot says in a convention is law now. Good to know.

We needed those extra states tha Obama claims we have.

Again, where is it law that a rape is not a sexual offense? 101 claimed it, let him back it up if he has the nads to try.

I don't think he does.


If you go on a road trip across every state in our nation and then go back thru the some of the same ones how many states did you cross.


Did you pass grade school arithmetic word problems?????

Why are you trying to change the subject?

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[billvon 3,111]

Your one warning. Cut it out.

[Driver1 0]

billvon

Your one warning. Cut it out.

Hasn't she accumulated enough warnings over the years?

There will be no addressing the customers as "Bitches", "Morons" or "Retards"!