kallend 2,175 #1 June 30, 2015 And the greatest threat isn't Islamic militants. sites.duke.edu/tcths/files/2013/06/Kurzman_Schanzer_Law_Enforcement_Assessment_of_the_Violent_Extremist_Threat_final.pdf... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,471 #2 July 1, 2015 Hi John, Quote the greatest threat isn't Islamic militants Hmmm, does the name Cliven Bundy sound familiar? Jerry Baumchen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,175 #3 July 1, 2015 JerryBaumchen Hi John, Quote the greatest threat isn't Islamic militants Hmmm, does the name Cliven Bundy sound familiar? Jerry Baumchen It does, and as I recall quite a few of the anti-government SC regulars supported his actions. Funny that they haven't commented on this thread.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Driver1 0 #4 July 1, 2015 Islamic militants haven't been able to mount up much of a threat to mainland US interests, because homeland security, CIA, FBI and other agencies have been keeping a damn close eye on all suspected individuals, monitoring communications, etc... They have to.There will be no addressing the customers as "Bitches", "Morons" or "Retards"! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #5 July 1, 2015 kallend And the greatest threat isn't Islamic militants. sites.duke.edu/tcths/files/2013/06/Kurzman_Schanzer_Law_Enforcement_Assessment_of_the_Violent_Extremist_Threat_final.pdf It's also been narrowed down to a particular brand of anti-government nuts, the sovereigns. http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/19/politics/terror-threat-homeland-security/index.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
