AGW +2C? +6C? It has happened before.

[cvfd1399 0]

For science yea, for a for profit company.....Na

[brenthutch 444]

billvon

>Only a lefty would define that as success.

Uh . . . . OK. I guess you don't think the Falcon 9 is a success, either. (Or the Apollo program, or the X-15, or Arpanet.)

(Think crow will taste any better in five years?)

"SpaceX has tried to land its CRS-6 first stage rocket on a barge in the middle of the ocean three times. And each time it's failed. But damn if it doesn't make for some spectacular video."

"According to SpaceX an "anomaly" was detected during a Friday test launch of the private space company's latest three-engined Falcon 9-R Dev1, triggering the vehicle's "flight termination system."

Again only a lefty would call this a success.

With regard to the tast of crow, I will defer to you and your prodigious appetite.

[kallend 2,107]

turtlespeed

******Here is something interesting.

I wonder if the usual suspects will argue with scientists from MIT.

Quote

Exactly why our planet occasionally cools down has taken more than a century to work out. Now we know that cyclic gravitational tugs from Jupiter and Saturn periodically elongate Earth’s orbit, and this effect combines from time to time with slow changes in the direction and degree of Earth’s tilt that are caused by the gravity of our large moon. Consequently, summer sunlight around the poles is reduced, and high-­latitude regions such as Alaska, northern Canada, and Siberia turn cold enough to preserve snow year-round. This constant snow cover reflects a great deal of sunlight, cooling things down even more, and a new ice age begins. Naturally, this process does not occur with anything like the speed portrayed in the movie The Day After Tomorrow, but geological and other evidence shows that it’s happened at least four times.

***http://www.technologyreview.com/article/416786/global-warming-vs-the-next-ice-age/

Yes, if "now" goes back 300+ years. Isaac Newton's "Principia" (Vol 3) predicts exactly this effect. Cambridge Mass is just 300 years behind Cambridge England.

Prediction is not fact, or, maybe is it in your reality? That would certainly explain some things.

It is in the Solar System's reality too. Newton's predictions turned out to be correct.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[turtlespeed 226]

kallend

*********Here is something interesting.

I wonder if the usual suspects will argue with scientists from MIT.

Quote

Exactly why our planet occasionally cools down has taken more than a century to work out. Now we know that cyclic gravitational tugs from Jupiter and Saturn periodically elongate Earth’s orbit, and this effect combines from time to time with slow changes in the direction and degree of Earth’s tilt that are caused by the gravity of our large moon. Consequently, summer sunlight around the poles is reduced, and high-­latitude regions such as Alaska, northern Canada, and Siberia turn cold enough to preserve snow year-round. This constant snow cover reflects a great deal of sunlight, cooling things down even more, and a new ice age begins. Naturally, this process does not occur with anything like the speed portrayed in the movie The Day After Tomorrow, but geological and other evidence shows that it’s happened at least four times.

***http://www.technologyreview.com/article/416786/global-warming-vs-the-next-ice-age/

Yes, if "now" goes back 300+ years. Isaac Newton's "Principia" (Vol 3) predicts exactly this effect. Cambridge Mass is just 300 years behind Cambridge England.

Prediction is not fact, or, maybe is it in your reality? That would certainly explain some things.

It is in the Solar System's reality too. Newton's predictions turned out to be correct.

Every one of them?

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[Anvilbrother 0]

SkyDekker

Quote

"Overwhelming" is opinion. "Critical" is opinion.

It's like saying my wife is hotter than yours. It's opinion. Or that your wife has better judgment on picking a spouse. It's an opinion. I agree, but opinion.

No, it isn't. If I define overwhelming as anything over 95% succes success rate and it is clear what success is, then overwhelming success isn't an opinion, it is a fact.

Fixed that one for you too.

Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along,

[Anvilbrother 0]

SkyDekker

Quote

I think

Its It's a start I guess.

I have discovered even more errors!

Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along,

[turtlespeed 226]

Anvilbrother

***

Quote

I think

Its It's a start I guess.

I have discovered even more errors!



Someone needs to clean up his own back yard before complaining about the trash next door.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[kallend 2,107]

turtlespeed

************Here is something interesting.

I wonder if the usual suspects will argue with scientists from MIT.

Quote

Exactly why our planet occasionally cools down has taken more than a century to work out. Now we know that cyclic gravitational tugs from Jupiter and Saturn periodically elongate Earth’s orbit, and this effect combines from time to time with slow changes in the direction and degree of Earth’s tilt that are caused by the gravity of our large moon. Consequently, summer sunlight around the poles is reduced, and high-­latitude regions such as Alaska, northern Canada, and Siberia turn cold enough to preserve snow year-round. This constant snow cover reflects a great deal of sunlight, cooling things down even more, and a new ice age begins. Naturally, this process does not occur with anything like the speed portrayed in the movie The Day After Tomorrow, but geological and other evidence shows that it’s happened at least four times.

***http://www.technologyreview.com/article/416786/global-warming-vs-the-next-ice-age/

Yes, if "now" goes back 300+ years. Isaac Newton's "Principia" (Vol 3) predicts exactly this effect. Cambridge Mass is just 300 years behind Cambridge England.

Prediction is not fact, or, maybe is it in your reality? That would certainly explain some things.

It is in the Solar System's reality too. Newton's predictions turned out to be correct.

Every one of them?

The ones under discussion in this thread, as well as a whole lot of others.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Anvilbrother

***

Quote

I think

Its It's a start I guess.

I have discovered even more errors!

Kind of retarded isn't it.

[Anvilbrother 0]

Yea dude had it coming, but you are not a better person by being a grammar nazi while dodging the issues, and make the same mistakes yourself.

Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along,

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Lol, I tried to tell you this in the other thread. If I was a grammar nazi, I could have pointed out many mistakes. Yet, I only pointed it out in the sentence in which he decided to slip a little veiled PA. Probably way too subtle for an Anvil, hence this hammer.

[turtlespeed 226]

SkyDekker

Lol, I tried to tell you this in the other thread. If I was a grammar nazi, I could have pointed out many mistakes. Yet, I only pointed it out in the sentence in which he decided to slip a little veiled PA. Probably way too subtle for an Anvil, hence this hammer.

Ummm, less like a hammer and more like tongs.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[kallend 2,107]

As the conservatives are telling us in the "Racist UCLA Professor outed" thread, it's quite OK to correct grammar and spelling.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[Anvilbrother 0]

Well feel free to start on mine first, I will take you 100 lifetimes.

Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along,

[turtlespeed 226]

Anvilbrother

Well feel free to start on mine first, I will take you 100 lifetimes.

Take him?

You will take him, literally, figuratively, or physically?

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[Anvilbrother 0]

turtlespeed

***Well feel free to start on mine first, I will take you 100 lifetimes.

Take him?

You will take him, literally, figuratively, or physically?
He couldn't handle this.

Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along,

[brenthutch 444]

kallend

***************Here is something interesting.

I wonder if the usual suspects will argue with scientists from MIT.

Quote

Exactly why our planet occasionally cools down has taken more than a century to work out. Now we know that cyclic gravitational tugs from Jupiter and Saturn periodically elongate Earth’s orbit, and this effect combines from time to time with slow changes in the direction and degree of Earth’s tilt that are caused by the gravity of our large moon. Consequently, summer sunlight around the poles is reduced, and high-­latitude regions such as Alaska, northern Canada, and Siberia turn cold enough to preserve snow year-round. This constant snow cover reflects a great deal of sunlight, cooling things down even more, and a new ice age begins. Naturally, this process does not occur with anything like the speed portrayed in the movie The Day After Tomorrow, but geological and other evidence shows that it’s happened at least four times.

***http://www.technologyreview.com/article/416786/global-warming-vs-the-next-ice-age/

Yes, if "now" goes back 300+ years. Isaac Newton's "Principia" (Vol 3) predicts exactly this effect. Cambridge Mass is just 300 years behind Cambridge England.

Prediction is not fact, or, maybe is it in your reality? That would certainly explain some things.

It is in the Solar System's reality too. Newton's predictions turned out to be correct.

Every one of them?

The ones under discussion in this thread, as well as a whole lot of others.

Tell that to the planet Mercury

[kallend 2,107]

brenthutch

******************Here is something interesting.

I wonder if the usual suspects will argue with scientists from MIT.

Quote

Exactly why our planet occasionally cools down has taken more than a century to work out. Now we know that cyclic gravitational tugs from Jupiter and Saturn periodically elongate Earth’s orbit, and this effect combines from time to time with slow changes in the direction and degree of Earth’s tilt that are caused by the gravity of our large moon. Consequently, summer sunlight around the poles is reduced, and high-­latitude regions such as Alaska, northern Canada, and Siberia turn cold enough to preserve snow year-round. This constant snow cover reflects a great deal of sunlight, cooling things down even more, and a new ice age begins. Naturally, this process does not occur with anything like the speed portrayed in the movie The Day After Tomorrow, but geological and other evidence shows that it’s happened at least four times.

***http://www.technologyreview.com/article/416786/global-warming-vs-the-next-ice-age/

Yes, if "now" goes back 300+ years. Isaac Newton's "Principia" (Vol 3) predicts exactly this effect. Cambridge Mass is just 300 years behind Cambridge England.

Prediction is not fact, or, maybe is it in your reality? That would certainly explain some things.

It is in the Solar System's reality too. Newton's predictions turned out to be correct.

Every one of them?

The ones under discussion in this thread, as well as a whole lot of others.

Tell that to the planet Mercury

In which Proposition, Corollary or Scholium of Principia does Newton make any predictions about anomalies in the orbit of Mercury?

On which prior post in this thread is Mercury's orbit discussed?

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[Anvilbrother 0]

kallend

*********************Here is something interesting.

I wonder if the usual suspects will argue with scientists from MIT.

Quote

Exactly why our planet occasionally cools down has taken more than a century to work out. Now we know that cyclic gravitational tugs from Jupiter and Saturn periodically elongate Earth’s orbit, and this effect combines from time to time with slow changes in the direction and degree of Earth’s tilt that are caused by the gravity of our large moon. Consequently, summer sunlight around the poles is reduced, and high-­latitude regions such as Alaska, northern Canada, and Siberia turn cold enough to preserve snow year-round. This constant snow cover reflects a great deal of sunlight, cooling things down even more, and a new ice age begins. Naturally, this process does not occur with anything like the speed portrayed in the movie The Day After Tomorrow, but geological and other evidence shows that it’s happened at least four times.

***http://www.technologyreview.com/article/416786/global-warming-vs-the-next-ice-age/

Yes, if "now" goes back 300+ years. Isaac Newton's "Principia" (Vol 3) predicts exactly this effect. Cambridge Mass is just 300 years behind Cambridge England.

Prediction is not fact, or, maybe is it in your reality? That would certainly explain some things.

It is in the Solar System's reality too. Newton's predictions turned out to be correct.

Every one of them?

The ones under discussion in this thread, as well as a whole lot of others.

Tell that to the planet Mercury

In which Proposition, Corollary or Scholium of Principia does Newton make any predictions about anomalies in the orbit of Mercury?

On which prior post in this thread is Mercury's orbit discussed?

I'm just here so I wont get fined. And to make that quote box bigger.

Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along,

[kallend 2,107]

Anvilbrother

I'm just here so I wont get fined. And to make that quite box bigger.

Do you mean "quote box"?

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[turtlespeed 226]

kallend

***

I'm just here so I wont get fined. And to make that quite box bigger.

Do you mean "quote box"?

Quite.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[Anvilbrother 0]

You must have been sitting on that reply button, I fixed it immediatly after it posted.

Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along,

[brenthutch 444]

kallend

*********************Here is something interesting.

I wonder if the usual suspects will argue with scientists from MIT.

Quote

Exactly why our planet occasionally cools down has taken more than a century to work out. Now we know that cyclic gravitational tugs from Jupiter and Saturn periodically elongate Earth’s orbit, and this effect combines from time to time with slow changes in the direction and degree of Earth’s tilt that are caused by the gravity of our large moon. Consequently, summer sunlight around the poles is reduced, and high-­latitude regions such as Alaska, northern Canada, and Siberia turn cold enough to preserve snow year-round. This constant snow cover reflects a great deal of sunlight, cooling things down even more, and a new ice age begins. Naturally, this process does not occur with anything like the speed portrayed in the movie The Day After Tomorrow, but geological and other evidence shows that it’s happened at least four times.

***http://www.technologyreview.com/article/416786/global-warming-vs-the-next-ice-age/

Yes, if "now" goes back 300+ years. Isaac Newton's "Principia" (Vol 3) predicts exactly this effect. Cambridge Mass is just 300 years behind Cambridge England.

Prediction is not fact, or, maybe is it in your reality? That would certainly explain some things.

It is in the Solar System's reality too. Newton's predictions turned out to be correct.

Every one of them?

The ones under discussion in this thread, as well as a whole lot of others.

Tell that to the planet Mercury

In which Proposition, Corollary or Scholium of Principia does Newton make any predictions about anomalies in the orbit of Mercury?

On which prior post in this thread is Mercury's orbit discussed?

It is in the Solar Systems reality too.

[kallend 2,107]

brenthutch

************************Here is something interesting.

I wonder if the usual suspects will argue with scientists from MIT.

Quote

Exactly why our planet occasionally cools down has taken more than a century to work out. Now we know that cyclic gravitational tugs from Jupiter and Saturn periodically elongate Earth’s orbit, and this effect combines from time to time with slow changes in the direction and degree of Earth’s tilt that are caused by the gravity of our large moon. Consequently, summer sunlight around the poles is reduced, and high-­latitude regions such as Alaska, northern Canada, and Siberia turn cold enough to preserve snow year-round. This constant snow cover reflects a great deal of sunlight, cooling things down even more, and a new ice age begins. Naturally, this process does not occur with anything like the speed portrayed in the movie The Day After Tomorrow, but geological and other evidence shows that it’s happened at least four times.

***http://www.technologyreview.com/article/416786/global-warming-vs-the-next-ice-age/

Yes, if "now" goes back 300+ years. Isaac Newton's "Principia" (Vol 3) predicts exactly this effect. Cambridge Mass is just 300 years behind Cambridge England.

Prediction is not fact, or, maybe is it in your reality? That would certainly explain some things.

It is in the Solar System's reality too. Newton's predictions turned out to be correct.

Every one of them?

The ones under discussion in this thread, as well as a whole lot of others.

Tell that to the planet Mercury

In which Proposition, Corollary or Scholium of Principia does Newton make any predictions about anomalies in the orbit of Mercury?

On which prior post in this thread is Mercury's orbit discussed?

It is in the Solar Systems reality too.

So you can't find any Proposition, Corollary or Scholium of Principia in which Newton makes any predictions about anomalies in the orbit of Mercury? Thought not.

And you can't find any prior post in this thread in which Mercury's orbit discussed? Thought not.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[brenthutch 444]

kallend

***************************Here is something interesting.

I wonder if the usual suspects will argue with scientists from MIT.

Quote

Exactly why our planet occasionally cools down has taken more than a century to work out. Now we know that cyclic gravitational tugs from Jupiter and Saturn periodically elongate Earth’s orbit, and this effect combines from time to time with slow changes in the direction and degree of Earth’s tilt that are caused by the gravity of our large moon. Consequently, summer sunlight around the poles is reduced, and high-­latitude regions such as Alaska, northern Canada, and Siberia turn cold enough to preserve snow year-round. This constant snow cover reflects a great deal of sunlight, cooling things down even more, and a new ice age begins. Naturally, this process does not occur with anything like the speed portrayed in the movie The Day After Tomorrow, but geological and other evidence shows that it’s happened at least four times.

***http://www.technologyreview.com/article/416786/global-warming-vs-the-next-ice-age/

Yes, if "now" goes back 300+ years. Isaac Newton's "Principia" (Vol 3) predicts exactly this effect. Cambridge Mass is just 300 years behind Cambridge England.

Prediction is not fact, or, maybe is it in your reality? That would certainly explain some things.

It is in the Solar System's reality too. Newton's predictions turned out to be correct.

Every one of them?

The ones under discussion in this thread, as well as a whole lot of others.

Tell that to the planet Mercury

In which Proposition, Corollary or Scholium of Principia does Newton make any predictions about anomalies in the orbit of Mercury?

On which prior post in this thread is Mercury's orbit discussed?

It is in the Solar Systems reality too.

So you can't find any Proposition, Corollary or Scholium of Principia in which Newton makes any predictions about anomalies in the orbit of Mercury? Thought not.

And you can't find any prior post in this thread in which Mercury's orbit discussed? Thought not.

Why didn't he?