lawrocket 3 #1 April 5, 2015 http://m.nydailynews.com/news/politics/senator-anarchist-cookbook-deleted-internet-article-1.2173566 Banning books now? The book wasn't bannable in 1971 but is now? Way to drum up interest in the book, Senator. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cvfd1399 0 #2 April 5, 2015 Politicians are fucking idiots. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #3 April 5, 2015 cvfd1399Politicians are fucking idiots. Wow. Liberals banning books. What's next, witch hunts and McCarthyism again? LOVE THE DEMSI'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #4 April 5, 2015 Quote“These documents are not, in my view, protected by the First Amendment In my view, they are. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #5 April 5, 2015 Andy9o8Quote“These documents are not, in my view, protected by the First Amendment In my view, they are. In my view, some are and some aren't.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
regulator 0 #6 April 5, 2015 lawrockethttp://m.nydailynews.com/news/politics/senator-anarchist-cookbook-deleted-internet-article-1.2173566 Banning books now? The book wasn't bannable in 1971 but is now? Way to drum up interest in the book, Senator. If Harry Reid can leave then so can this old hag. She needs to be put out to pasture. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,594 #7 April 5, 2015 "The officer embedded themselves with the Queens women and even questioned during a Nov. 2 encounter who reads 'chemistry books for breakfast'." This journalist should be removed from the internet.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #8 April 5, 2015 Just an fyi for context, the NY Daily News is in roughly the same category as your Daily Mail. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #9 April 5, 2015 jakee"The officer embedded themselves with the Queens women and even questioned during a Nov. 2 encounter who reads 'chemistry books for breakfast'." This journalist should be removed from the internet. So should the subject of the article.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #10 April 5, 2015 turtlespeed***"The officer embedded themselves with the Queens women and even questioned during a Nov. 2 encounter who reads 'chemistry books for breakfast'." This journalist should be removed from the internet. So should the subject of the article. I remember back in the hippie days when they said the same thing about Abbie Hoffman's book "Steal This Book". (Look it up). The problem with restraint of this book is that today it's this book, tomorrow they'll be banning a book that instructs people how to engage in civil disobedience to unjust laws. Slippery slope and all that. Shouldn't have that, at least not in the US. To me, that's the beauty of the US's First Amendment, which is just about the broadest free-speech and free-press guarantee in the entire world, including all the other "Western" countries. We've had over 200 years of it now, and I don't see the US any weaker for it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
regulator 0 #11 April 5, 2015 Didn't they try to do the same thing with the anarchist's cookbook a decade or so ago? http://www.amazon.com/The-Anarchist-Cookbook-William-Powell/dp/1502994380 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #12 April 5, 2015 So an FBI informant, (in an effort to create a plot for the FBI to bust), gives a 45-year-old book, (with numerous errors), written by a 22 year old kid, (who has since condemned his own book), to a couple malcontents. And now a politician, (who apparently understands the Internet as well as Ted Stevens), is using the Striesand Effect to ensure the old book is being downloaded or purchased by millions who had never previously heard of it. "There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grue 1 #13 April 5, 2015 Feinstein should suck-start a shotgun and log out of the world of the living. She's not evil incarnate, but would still be doing the world a favor. Worse yet, she's so far removed from reality she couldn't find her own ass with shiva's arms and a GPS.cavete terrae. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #14 April 5, 2015 ryoder So an FBI informant, (in an effort to create a plot for the FBI to bust), gives a 45-year-old book, (with numerous errors), written by a 22 year old kid, (who has since condemned his own book), to a couple malcontents. And now a politician, (who apparently understands the Internet as well as Ted Stevens), is using the Striesand Effect to ensure the old book is being downloaded or purchased by millions who had never previously heard of it. Yep. This is the publisher's wet dream My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,594 #15 April 5, 2015 turtlespeed ***"The officer embedded themselves with the Queens women and even questioned during a Nov. 2 encounter who reads 'chemistry books for breakfast'." This journalist should be removed from the internet. So should the subject of the article.Aha! So you think Feinstein should be able to subvert the constitution in secret eh?But seriously though it should be written about by someone who knows how to write. I mean, if you're a carpenter you should now when to use which joints. If you're an engineer you should be familiar with stress and strain calculations. If you're a journalist you should be able to write coherent english sentences in accordance with the AP Stylebook.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #16 April 5, 2015 It's right up there with To Kill a Mockingbird and Catcher in the Rye. www.ala.org/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbooks/top10#2013... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boomerdog 0 #17 April 6, 2015 Senator Feinstein wants to ban a 45 year old book One of the reasons I got the hell out of California in '98. The woman deserves a permanent padded cell in isolation at "Q." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #18 April 6, 2015 Boomerdog Senator Feinstein wants to ban a 45 year old book One of the reasons I got the hell out of California in '98. The woman deserves a permanent padded cell in isolation at "Q." The US Capitol comes pretty close.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boomerdog 0 #19 April 6, 2015 QuoteThe US Capitol comes pretty close. Lawrocket and I (being from California) know what 'Q' is. Here's a hint...it's not a character in Star Trek. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,587 #20 April 6, 2015 Most people can figure out what Q is. She can room there with Tex Nugent. Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boomerdog 0 #21 April 6, 2015 QuoteMost people can figure out what Q is. Well then? Quote She can room there with Tex Nugent. The idea certainly has merit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #22 April 6, 2015 grueFeinstein should suck-start a shotgun and log out of the world of the living. Whoa. Steady as she goes there, pardner. Give yourself time to adjust to being back. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,587 #23 April 6, 2015 I'll admit I assume it means San Quentin. And obviously I meant Ted Nugent -- Tex Nugent was a minor league ballplayer in the 20's or so Wendy P. There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boomerdog 0 #24 April 6, 2015 San Quentin...RIGHT YOU ARE! and one look at that place from the Larkspur Landing Bridge (The One Dirty Harry was standing on when Scorpio drove the bus past him in the movie) is a scary visual. Yeah I knew ya meant Ted Nugent! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #25 April 6, 2015 Boomerdog Quote The US Capitol comes pretty close. Lawrocket and I (being from California) know what 'Q' is. Here's a hint...it's not a character in Star Trek. I've lived in the Bay Area.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites