0
jclalor

Missouri to execute old man missing part of his brain

Recommended Posts

jakee

Quote

there are cases, where there is NO DOUBT of who commited the crime. Either by admission



You think a confession of guilt removes all doubt? That is painfully naive.No, your words not mine

Quote

the beyond a resonable doubt is the legal term/line



So where's the legal term/line for beyond all doubt? How do you codify that?



the problem here is (I think) you do not believe in the DP at all. That is ok but, let me give you an example of guilty beyond any doubt

Think of the recent Paris shooting
Lets take the video of the ass hat who killed the cop in cold blood. Lets say that same video had a close up of the killers face and therfore the identy is iron clad
Any doubt?
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

there are cases, where there is NO DOUBT of who commited the crime. Either by admission

You think a confession of guilt removes all doubt? That is painfully naive

No, your words not mine



Then what did you mean by "by admission"? Why did you say it?

Quote

Lets take the video of the asshat who killed the cop in cold blood. Lets say that same video had a close up of the killer's face and therefore the identity is iron clad



Did it?
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jakee

Quote

Quote

Quote

there are cases, where there is NO DOUBT of who commited the crime. Either by admission

You think a confession of guilt removes all doubt? That is painfully naive

No, your words not mine



Then what did you mean by "by admission"? Why did you say it?

Quote

Lets take the video of the asshat who killed the cop in cold blood. Lets say that same video had a close up of the killer's face and therefore the identity is iron clad



Did it?



I had a hunch you would not answer the question
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rushmc

Think of the recent Paris shooting
Lets take the video of the ass hat who killed the cop in cold blood. Lets say that same video had a close up of the killers face and therfore the identy is iron clad
Any doubt?



I find life in prison to be much more vengeance focused and bloodthirsty. It seems crueler IMO.

But either way, we are "taking away someone's life" for the express purpose of protecting the rest of society. So I get conflicted when we talk about a different standard to declare guilty when DP is on the line. And I've argued that we need a very strong standard for the DP, but wouldn't it be the same for a Life sentence regardless?

Perhaps one option is this. Once declared guilty by our strong standards for the type of crimes that would dictate DP or Life Imprisonment, it should be an option for the guilty party to choose, rather than dictated by society. Either way, we protect society (our only real goal), and by giving the choice to the criminal, society gets the least cruel solution in the eyes of the one getting the punishment (meets the moral requirement to do the least cruelty).

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rushmc

***

Quote

there are cases, where there is NO DOUBT of who commited the crime. Either by admission



You think a confession of guilt removes all doubt? That is painfully naive.No, your words not mine

Quote

the beyond a resonable doubt is the legal term/line



So where's the legal term/line for beyond all doubt? How do you codify that?



the problem here is (I think) you do not believe in the DP at all. That is ok but, let me give you an example of guilty beyond any doubt

Think of the recent Paris shooting
Lets take the video of the ass hat who killed the cop in cold blood. Lets say that same video had a close up of the killers face and therfore the identy is iron clad
Any doubt?

Think about when someone admits to dismembering and dumping a body at sea, that sounds pretty "Iron clad"...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rehmwa

***Think of the recent Paris shooting
Lets take the video of the ass hat who killed the cop in cold blood. Lets say that same video had a close up of the killers face and therfore the identy is iron clad
Any doubt?



I find life in prison to be much more vengeance focused and bloodthirsty. It seems crueler IMO.

But either way, we are "taking away someone's life" for the express purpose of protecting the rest of society. So I get conflicted when we talk about a different standard to declare guilty when DP is on the line. And I've argued that we need a very strong standard for the DP, but wouldn't it be the same for a Life sentence regardless?

Perhaps one option is this. Once declared guilty by our strong standards for the type of crimes that would dictate DP or Life Imprisonment, it should be an option for the guilty party to choose, rather than dictated by society. Either way, we protect society (our only real goal), and by giving the choice to the criminal, society gets the least cruel solution in the eyes of the one getting the punishment (meets the moral requirement to do the least cruelty).

The DP is a tough one
For me there are only a few cases where I think it is a reasonalbe recourse
Very few
I like your thoughts however
Thanks
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jclalor

******

Quote

there are cases, where there is NO DOUBT of who commited the crime. Either by admission



You think a confession of guilt removes all doubt? That is painfully naive.No, your words not mine

Quote

the beyond a resonable doubt is the legal term/line



So where's the legal term/line for beyond all doubt? How do you codify that?



the problem here is (I think) you do not believe in the DP at all. That is ok but, let me give you an example of guilty beyond any doubt

Think of the recent Paris shooting
Lets take the video of the ass hat who killed the cop in cold blood. Lets say that same video had a close up of the killers face and therfore the identy is iron clad
Any doubt?

Think about when someone admits to dismembering and dumping a body at sea, that sounds pretty "Iron clad"...

As jakee stated, admissions/confesions can be suspect
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I had a hunch you would not answer the question



I was asking for clarification. Does the video have a close up? Can I watch it for myself to see how clear it is - or did you need to invent a scenario of NO DOUBT because you don't have one from real life?

But OK, let's say that there's a video that clearly shows a face - who decides how clear is clear enough? What is the quality neccessary for a 100% positive ID and what is it for 99%?


Oh, and why didn't you answer the question? Why did you say "by admission" as an example of NO DOUBT if you don't think an admission removes all doubt?
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jakee

Quote

I had a hunch you would not answer the question



I was asking for clarification. Does the video have a close up? Can I watch it for myself to see how clear it is - or did you need to invent a scenario of NO DOUBT because you don't have one from real life?

But OK, let's say that there's a video that clearly shows a face - who decides how clear is clear enough? What is the quality neccessary for a 100% positive ID and what is it for 99%?


Oh, and why didn't you answer the question? Why did you say "by admission" as an example of NO DOUBT if you don't think an admission removes all doubt?



Look
You dont like the DP. Fine then say so
As for admission see my post above where I mostly agreed with you

You are just too busy trying to start a pissing contest
Dont get your shoes wet.......
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Look
You dont like the DP. Fine then say so



I don't see how it can be reserved for cases where it is totally certain that the convicted person is guilty. And since you're dodging any question related to that I guess you don't either.

Quote

As for admission see my post above where I mostly agreed with you



So when you said it was an example of NO DOUBT you were mistaken? Is that how well thought out your death penalty stance is?
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rushmc

***

Quote

You missed his point



Look who's the mind reader now;)

What point of his do you think I missed?


there are cases, where there is NO DOUBT of who commited the crime. Either by admission or by tape.
And he was saying, as I have also said, if there is no doubt he/I have no problem with the death penalty

the beyond a resonable doubt is the legal term/line
Again, that is not what he was talking about IMO

If it's on video it must be true, right? We KNOW Darth Vader was a real person, we all saw the video.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

******

Quote

You missed his point



Look who's the mind reader now;)

What point of his do you think I missed?


there are cases, where there is NO DOUBT of who commited the crime. Either by admission or by tape.
And he was saying, as I have also said, if there is no doubt he/I have no problem with the death penalty

the beyond a resonable doubt is the legal term/line
Again, that is not what he was talking about IMO

If it's on video it must be true, right? We KNOW Darth Vader was a real person, we all saw the video.

Ya
And you dont want to ban guns
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
normiss

Sometimes, the only difference in guilt and innocence, is timing.
;)



Sometimes the difference between guilt and innocence is nothing.:o
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0