rehmwa 2 #26 March 13, 2015 wolfriverjoeSkull? Or scalp? perhaps in his stocking cap it was on the radio yesterday, I think, can't replay it now ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anvilbrother 0 #27 March 13, 2015 Does it not still meet the definition of being shot? A bullet left a barrel and stopped in his face. I dont care how it got there, or where it ended up that is no joke on a health and legal standpoint. You dont get less years in prison for shooting someone in the scalp vs parking a .45 in someones brain. Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #28 March 13, 2015 I feel compelled to speak out. I resent the shooter(s) being referred-to as a "gunman". Is there any evidence the shooter was a man and not a woman? Women shoot guns, too. Some women even give themselves firearm-themed screen-names online. So as presumptions go, it's really kind of nutless. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #29 March 13, 2015 Andy9o8 I feel compelled to speak out. I resent the shooter(s) being referred-to as a "gunman". Is there any evidence the shooter was a man and not a woman? Women shoot guns, too. Some women even give themselves firearm-themed screen-names online. So as presumptions go, it's really kind of nutless. Well, I used the term "shooter." Gender neutral. I did, however refer to the shooter as "he", but I was taught "old school" grammar, where singular subjects are attached to singular pronouns (can't use "they" with a single shooter) and that the male "he" is used primarily. It can be interchanged with "she", but in the case of gun crimes, the shooter is predominantly male. Whether it's part of the upbringing (men use guns, men use force to solve their problems, men "don't take shit" from the cops) or male vs female "wiring" (testosterone being one of the bigger factors) is a good question. But I'd bet very heavily that the shooter was a guy. "There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #30 March 13, 2015 Andy9o8I feel compelled to speak out. I resent the shooter(s) being referred-to as a "gunman". Is there any evidence the shooter was a man and not a woman? Women shoot guns, too. Some women even give themselves firearm-themed screen-names online. So as presumptions go, it's really kind of nutless. Or, if it is right, that the shooter was a man, it wood be very nutty.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #31 March 13, 2015 I meant to say referred to "in news articles" but forgot to type it. It's a subset of sexism: penisism. Join my cause. See you at the barricades. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,594 #32 March 13, 2015 Quote Well, I used the term "shooter." Could be a shootressDo you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #33 March 13, 2015 jakee Quote Well, I used the term "shooter." Could be a shootress Doesn't sound like they'd have the balls to pull the trigger.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #34 March 13, 2015 wolfriverjoe But I'd bet very heavily that the shooter was a guy. and his doctor likely didn't tell him anything about firearm safety ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #35 March 13, 2015 rehmwa *** But I'd bet very heavily that the shooter was a guy. and his doctor likely didn't tell him anything about firearm safety Well, there you go. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #36 March 14, 2015 Andy9o8 ****** But I'd bet very heavily that the shooter was a guy. and his doctor likely didn't tell him anything about firearm safety Well, there you go. Sounds like his doctor DID give him all the instruction the doctor was qualified to give on gun safety and this is the result.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 892 #37 March 14, 2015 Or they learned it from watching local news coverage. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #38 March 14, 2015 normiss Or they learned it from watching local news coverage. Pretty sure it was the doctors and their expertise on gun control.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
