brenthutch 444 #1 December 2, 2014 I was watching the Rachel Maddow show tonight and I must have heard the word "conversation" about a hundred times. What is up with that? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
yoink 321 #2 December 2, 2014 Rachel Maddow (whoever she is) has a fuck tonne of influence if she speaks for an entire demographic. and if you heard a word that often on a TV show, maybe she's just not a very good public speaker... Does there need to be a bigger issue than that? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #3 December 2, 2014 I have no idea what you just said. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anvilbrother 0 #4 December 2, 2014 It's not just you dude.....he needs to ninja edit that so it can be understood. Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #5 December 2, 2014 It is not just Rachel, if you did a shot every time Mika said "conversation" on Morning Joe, you would be hammered by six thirty. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BartsDaddy 7 #6 December 2, 2014 brenthutchI was watching the Rachel Maddow show tonight and I must have heard the word "conversation" about a hundred times. What is up with that? What is wrong with disscusion. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ibx 2 #7 December 2, 2014 QuoteWhat is wrong with disscusion. The only reliable way to solve differences in opinion is through a dual a sun rise with California legal AR-15s. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RonD1120 62 #8 December 2, 2014 The main stream media has a propensity to grab a buzz word and use it on all news shows for a particular story topic. An example that comes to mind is the word gravitas during the 2K presidential election. There are dozens more.Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #9 December 2, 2014 BartsDaddy***I was watching the Rachel Maddow show tonight and I must have heard the word "conversation" about a hundred times. What is up with that? What is wrong with disscusion. It shows a lack of back bone and a lack of decision making ability. We need people who rely on truthiness and make a decision and stick with it. Regardless of wether it is right or wrong. That simply doesn't matter. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
champu 1 #10 December 2, 2014 SkyDekker***What is wrong with disscusion. It shows a lack of back bone and a lack of decision making ability. We need people who rely on truthiness and make a decision and stick with it. Regardless of wether it is right or wrong. That simply doesn't matter. I agree, there's nothing wrong with discussion. (...he said... obviously... to an internet forum...) But when politicians and pundits get on television they want to have "conversations" about the same as used car salespeople want to have a "conversation" with you when you walk onto the lot, or a Jehovah's witness wants to have a "conversation" with you when they ring your doorbell. It's very inviting language, but you shouldn't take it at face value from "lefties" any more than "righties." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,175 #11 December 2, 2014 BartsDaddy***I was watching the Rachel Maddow show tonight and I must have heard the word "conversation" about a hundred times. What is up with that? What is wrong with disscusion. Easy! The spelling is incorrect.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #12 December 3, 2014 ibxQuoteWhat is wrong with disscusion. The only reliable way to solve differences in opinion is through a dual a sun rise with California legal AR-15s. California legal AR = Unicorn Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 3 #13 December 3, 2014 Quote Rachel Maddow (whoever she is) ...is a Rhodes scholar with a doctorate. Hey, just having a conversation here. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #14 December 3, 2014 brenthutch***QuoteWhat is wrong with disscusion. The only reliable way to solve differences in opinion is through a dual a sun rise with California legal AR-15s. California legal AR = Unicorn I'm sorry, are you trying to start a conversation? Must be some left wing pinko commie! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,175 #15 December 3, 2014 ibxQuoteWhat is wrong with disscusion. The only reliable way to solve differences in opinion is through a dual a sun rise with California legal AR-15s. Dual a sunrise? Is that something that happens on Tatooine?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
champu 1 #16 December 3, 2014 brenthutchCalifornia legal AR = Unicorn I neither advocate nor am saying there's anything wrong with this... https://www.google.com/search?q=ar+unicorn+paint+job&tbm=isch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #17 December 3, 2014 I'm kind of partial to the "Hello Kitty" AR myself. DuraCoat is pretty cool. https://www.google.com/search?q=hello+kitty+ar+15&rlz=1C1TSNO_enUS478US478&espv=2&biw=1366&bih=643&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=IzZ_VOKeG4urgwT-7IGgBA&ved=0CB0QsAQ#facrc=_&imgdii=_&imgrc=d1Uro-epA7S56M%253A%3B_BjMob0Dx6NLGM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fjp2.r0tt.com%252Fl_a07bab30-855e-11e1-8e58-575a69700002.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fbecuo.com%252Fhello-kitty-ar-15%3B400%3B274"There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #18 December 4, 2014 I was making a statement of fact, no retort necessary. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #19 December 4, 2014 brenthutchI was making a statement of fact, no retort necessary. Yes it was. A statement of fact, responding to a response to your original question. One might even describe that as a conversation. Guess you share the "lefties fetish". Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #20 December 4, 2014 A lefty "conversation." My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
