Recommended Posts
jakee 1,596
Quotemost likely because he was unrealistic about how reality works. Not surprising for
a segment of exceptionally intelligent and idealistic peopleanyone.
FIFY

rehmwa 2
Andy9o8and of Carter specifically as senile (that would be you) is not well-founded.
you are correct and I was using that very loosely and thus incorrectly - I'd rather say (and I think my post addresses) he's being much more outspoken lately on things he really should have boundaries in place. Something he previously did, but now he seems to be ignoring those boundaries in rather poor form and poor taste.
I do see this quite often with many completely functional people as they get older - the filter just disappears - for whatever reason. but I generalize, I shouldn't as generalizing is really is something I don't like.
...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants
Quote... but I would bet money that you can't come close to matching Carter's record of accomplishment.
Got me!
Right on that one!
But then I'm not a politician either and have had the unique priviledge to enjoy my career working legally, honestly, and ethically without being under the pall and spectre of going to jail.
And yes you are right. Jimmy Carter has been a great ex-President for all of the work he's done with Habitat for Humanity and the other accomplishments you cite. But in the context of his Presidency, I firmly stand on my initial post.
OBTW in the interest of full disclosure. I voted for Carter in '76. I didn't make the same mistake in '80.
Andy9o8 2
QuoteI'm not a politician either and have had the unique priviledge to enjoy my career working legally, honestly, and ethically without being under the pall and spectre of going to jail
There aren't many Presidents to whom that also applies, but I think long-term objective history will rule that for the most part it applied to Carter, too. In fairness, I'd probably say the same thing about Ford. Nobody else in my lifetime. Maybe Ike, sort of, if you exclude the FBI's persecution of suspected Reds.
Carter failed to inspire and give hope. Speaking "truthfully" is one thing. Anyone can do that. "You've got major depression." That's a fine and honest comment. "You're still depressed." Okay. Thanks for the honesty. "I'm not kidding. You're very grim."
Reagan was different. He was honest, too. His assessment matched Carter's - it sucked. His campaign? Are you better off than you were four years ago?
Honesty. People said they weren't. Reagan was honest. Leadership requires assessment. Then Reagan had a plan. Anybody can have a plan, though.
So Reagan did something that leader does: he got people to believe in him. To believe in his plan. Leadership is more than honesty. Carter didn't have an answer. Energy costs were high. Carter's response? "Wear a sweater." Interest rates were too high. Carter's response? Don't borrow as much. Inflation through the roof. Don't buy as much, unemployment too high. Get a job.
Carter validated the misery of the misery index. He told us ho much stag was in that stagflation. What he didn't do was inspure confidence that he could fix it. He told us how mediocre we were.
Reagan agreed. And convinced us that we would still be great. That's what was missing from Carter - inspiration.
Of course, since his presidency ended, Carter has made a living enduring that everyone knows what he thinks of America. He has had better things to say about North Korea, Cuba and Nicaragua and their leaders than the US and its leaders.
Note: Clinton started off as a good enough former POTUS. He's gone downhill in my estimation because of his well-known feuding with Obama.
My wife is hotter than your wife.
SkyDekker 1,465
billvon>Given a choice between a diplomatic solution to a problem and 20,000 dead US
>soldiers/2,000,000 dead foreigners they'll take the dead troops every time,
>because it's "the American way, dammit".
Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori.
Or virgins in the afterlife...there really is no difference.
grue 1
lawrocket
The best ex-president in the last 50 years? Reagan. He withdrew completely and died of Alzheimers. Let his Presidential actions speak for themselves and don't go poking at Bush or Clinton.
Similarly, the best president was William Henry Harrison who had the good grace to die of natural causes before he signed anything into law, an ideal that more presidents should aspire to.
Bertt 0
Quotemillions of people no longer live under the threat of river blindness, Guinea worm, trachoma, schistosomiasis, and lymphatic filariasis
You might have just highlighted the difference between working with people who want to solve problems and working with Congress.
kallend 2,150
lawrocket
Reagan was different. He was honest, too.
Ahem.... Iran-Contra, reducing the size of government, “Trees cause more pollution than automobiles do”, totally fabricated story about a Medal of Honor recipient.....
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites