0
Arvoitus

Its good thing Bush got rid of Saddam ...

Recommended Posts

turtlespeed

Quote

I wonder what our deficit would be today had we not gone on an unpaid for spending spree with Dick and Georges Excellent Adventure.



That's easy . . . At this point, its about 5 Trillion more than whatever it would have been, and climbing.



Right.. all based on the Bush Tax cuts.... and the unpaid for wars.

I guess the view from under the sand on TRICKLE on economics is different in those red states that what most of America is experiencing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Amazon

***I'm just wondering at what point you'll actually get around to blaming the people actually responsible for this decision, instead of blaming what Bush did 10 years ago...



Bush and Cheney and the rest of the PNAC boys in the Administration only saw one thing... and that was oil... I said that in 2003 and a bunch of those who participated are now coming clean and telling the truth finally. They started planning the Excellent Adventure in Iraq back in the 1990's[:/]

I'm just wondering at what point you'll get around to blaming the people actually responsible for this decision, instead of blaming what Bush did 10 years ago...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jclalor

***I'm just wondering at what point you'll actually get around to blaming the people actually responsible for this decision, instead of blaming what Bush did 10 years ago...



If you're gonna spend a trillion dollars, and sacrifice the lives of thousands of Americans, you better try and figure out what the long term implications of invading a middle eastern country are goings to be. Greeted as liberators and the Iraqi oil will pay all of our war cost is what we were promised by Bush/Cheney, unbelievable.

Gosh, no one can stick to the subject of child molestation.

So everything that's wrong with Iraq is Bush's fault. It was the garden of Eden before Bush's invasion. Everything was just perfect. If not for the invasion, Iraq today would be a shining beacon of prosperity and human rights. Got it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Boogers

******I'm just wondering at what point you'll actually get around to blaming the people actually responsible for this decision, instead of blaming what Bush did 10 years ago...



If you're gonna spend a trillion dollars, and sacrifice the lives of thousands of Americans, you better try and figure out what the long term implications of invading a middle eastern country are goings to be. Greeted as liberators and the Iraqi oil will pay all of our war cost is what we were promised by Bush/Cheney, unbelievable.

Gosh, no one can stick to the subject of child molestation.

So everything that's wrong with Iraq is Bush's fault. It was the garden of Eden before Bush's invasion. Everything was just perfect. If not for the invasion, Iraq today would ba shining beacon of prosperity and human rights. Got it.

Any US foriegn policy decision made in the Middle East should always involve the lesser of multiple evils. If I'm given the choice of a fundamentalist government or a secular government in the Middle East, I'll take the secular every day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Boogers

******I'm just wondering at what point you'll actually get around to blaming the people actually responsible for this decision, instead of blaming what Bush did 10 years ago...



Bush and Cheney and the rest of the PNAC boys in the Administration only saw one thing... and that was oil... I said that in 2003 and a bunch of those who participated are now coming clean and telling the truth finally. They started planning the Excellent Adventure in Iraq back in the 1990's[:/]

I'm just wondering at what point you'll get around to blaming the people actually responsible for this decision, instead of blaming what Bush did 10 years ago...

Probably about the time when a whole group of people who thought it was a great idea to go there in the first place..... stop practicing the cranial rectal insertion that has existed since that time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Boogers

******I'm just wondering at what point you'll actually get around to blaming the people actually responsible for this decision, instead of blaming what Bush did 10 years ago...



If you're gonna spend a trillion dollars, and sacrifice the lives of thousands of Americans, you better try and figure out what the long term implications of invading a middle eastern country are goings to be. Greeted as liberators and the Iraqi oil will pay all of our war cost is what we were promised by Bush/Cheney, unbelievable.

Gosh, no one can stick to the subject of child molestation.

So everything that's wrong with Iraq is Bush's fault. It was the garden of Eden before Bush's invasion. Everything was just perfect. If not for the invasion, Iraq today would be a shining beacon of prosperity and human rights. Got it.

The way things are now is a direct result of the way things were 10 years ago.

We had an administration that launched a war on false pretenses and willingly embraced torture. This was done in the name of the American people. It takes a curious form of partisan blindness to claim that such actions had no effect on what is happening in Iraq today.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DanG

Quote

So, 10 years from today, in the year 2024, we can blame everything that's wrong with America on Obama!



A large number of people around here started doing that the day after he was inaugurated after he was elected.



Sorry ... had to fix that since I think that was the day MitchMcConnel and Boehner met and set their plan to oppose anything the President put forth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
billvon

>So, 10 years from today, in the year 2024, we can blame everything that's
>wrong with America on Obama!

You've been doing that since before he was elected.



So you're saying that:
1) Those who blame Obama for everything are wrong, and;
2) Those who blame Bush for everything are right.

Is that the position you want to stick with?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

So you're saying that:
1) Those who blame Obama for everything are wrong, and;
2) Those who blame Bush for everything are right.

Is that the position you want to stick with?



You gotta love Speakers Corner.

No one ever said that.

But, what I understand you to be saying is:
1) You eat babies, and;
2) You hate puppies and old people.

Is that really the position you want to stick with?

- Dan G

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
billvon

>So you're saying that:
>1) Those who blame Obama for everything are wrong, and;
>2) Those who blame Bush for everything are right.

Not even close!



Well why don't you clarify for us then, just to show us that you don't have a partisan double-standard when it comes to such things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0