kallend 2,146 #51 January 27, 2014 GeorgiaDon Maybe the cost calculus would be different if you could not just declare bankruptcy and walk away from your debts, sticking the rest of us with the bill. Like Mary Brown, the GOP's poster girl against the ACA. She did exactly that. www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/03/10/plaintiff-in-landmark-anti-obamacare-lawsuit-bankrupted-by-medical-bills-you-and-i-pick-up-her-tab/... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #52 January 27, 2014 regulatorI completely understand what you are inferring and I agree with what you said and apologize for pointed words, however...where does one draw the line? If a person goes out gambling...they knew the risks and they lose all their money...then get a loan and lose that...the guy will either become homeless or get beat up or killed by the people that loaned him money. Cause and Action. If a person risks their money on wall street and loses everything...same type of cause and action. But if a person lives their lives paying their debts and the only supposed debt they had when they died was to help foot the bill for a law that was never going to work in the first place...well that doesnt seem fair. The bill in question is for health care received prior to death. Nothing to do with any law. You are a classic example of someone taken in by the the lies the GOP has woven around the ACA, because he doesn't bother to check the facts.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
