0
brenthutch

Global warming traps scientists in ice

Recommended Posts

brenthutch

It is not my reasoning/standard, it is the warmists. The hyperbolic doomsday scenarios have not come to pass as predicted by Hansen, Mann the IPCC, et al. They claimed the sky is falling. I have just pointed out that it hasn't.



The millions of people who are getting their asses kicked by weather phenomenon that used to be rare and are now becoming the norm are starting to think there might be something different than the way it was when they were children.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
brenthutch

Getting their asses kicked by a record low rate of tornados?


http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2013/05/09/quiet-tornado-season/2148075/



Give it time.. as things warm up for the year... its still snowing in places and spring is running a wee bit late for lots of the country. It won't be long now and things kick off real nice...
What was the cost to our country with the western droughts and arctic East???

http://www.theatlanticcities.com/jobs-and-economy/2014/03/no-relief-sight-drought-ravished-california/8696/

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/bs-bz-polar-vortex-utility-bills-20140323,0,3457391.story

What was the total death toll... it was already at 21 on 8 Jan...

http://www.foxnews.com/weather/2014/01/08/polar-vortex-blamed-for-at-least-21-deaths/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You mean like this?

"In conclusion, it is becoming ever more evident that the ongoing rise in the air's CO2 content is not only increasing the productivity of earth's common food plants, it is significantly increasing the quantity and potency of the many health-promoting substances found in their tissues, which are the ultimate sources of sustenance for essentially all animals and humans. Thus, as these foods make their way onto our dinner tables, they improve our health and help us better contend with the multitude of diseases and other maladies that regularly afflict us. In fact, it is possible, if not likely, that the lengthening of human life-span that has occurred over the past half-century or more - as described by Horiuchi (2000) and Tuljapurkar et al. (2000)9 - may in some significant part be due to the concomitant CO2-induced increases in the concentrations of the many health-promoting substances found in the various plant-derived foods that we eat."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
brenthutch

You mean like this?

"In conclusion, it is becoming ever more evident that the ongoing rise in the air's CO2 content is not only increasing the productivity of earth's common food plants, it is significantly increasing the quantity and potency of the many health-promoting substances found in their tissues, which are the ultimate sources of sustenance for essentially all animals and humans. Thus, as these foods make their way onto our dinner tables, they improve our health and help us better contend with the multitude of diseases and other maladies that regularly afflict us. In fact, it is possible, if not likely, that the lengthening of human life-span that has occurred over the past half-century or more - as described by Horiuchi (2000) and Tuljapurkar et al. (2000)9 - may in some significant part be due to the concomitant CO2-induced increases in the concentrations of the many health-promoting substances found in the various plant-derived foods that we eat."



Sure go ahead and eat your Monsanto food... I wonder what your offspring will look like a few generations down the line.

Have at it with chemical intake from pesticides too.

I wonder if there will be much food around when there are no bees to pollinate because Monsanto killed all of them off.

Change.... it is happening under the noses and a lot of people can not or will not see it.
Label the next geologic epoch after the Holocene.... the WeShouldaCene

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
brenthutch

Why then do we have fewer tornados, hurricanes, floods, wildfires, droughts, tropical diseases, and MORE polar bears?



I suppose it is due to people with their heads buried in places they shouldn't have them and incapable of seeing the larger picture... or just seeing what they want to from their favorite FAUX News site.:S:S:S

All the rain that the drought areas need... we got here in the foothills of the Cascades.. RECORD for March.. 9+" for Seattle where 3 to 4" is the "norm". In the foothills where I live.. it was over 2 ft of rain. 30 miles north... it caused a little landslide you may have heard about.... that obliterated a small community called Oso WA.. 39 dead so far.[:/]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
brenthutch

Why then do we have fewer tornados, hurricanes, floods, wildfires, droughts, tropical diseases, and MORE polar bears?



It's been pointed out to you before but apparently you forgot: North America is NOT the world.

www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/431px_width/public/January-2014-Land-and-Ocean-Temperature-Percentiles.gif?itok=4NRnRMyw

www.ncdc.noaa.gov/news/ncdc-releases-february-2014-global-climate-report

robertscribbler.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/nasa-march-3rd-hottest.gif
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Amazon

***Why then do we have fewer tornados, hurricanes, floods, wildfires, droughts, tropical diseases, and MORE polar bears?



I suppose it is due to people with their heads buried in places they shouldn't have them and incapable of seeing the larger picture... or just seeing what they want to from their favorite FAUX News site.:S:S:S

All the rain that the drought areas need... we got here in the foothills of the Cascades.. RECORD for March.. 9+" for Seattle where 3 to 4" is the "norm". In the foothills where I live.. it was over 2 ft of rain. 30 miles north... it caused a little landslide you may have heard about.... that obliterated a small community called Oso WA.. 39 dead so far.[:/]

Hey Kallend, do you want to give the "Oso WA is not the globe" speech to Amazone or do you want me to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
brenthutch

Who said anything about North America?



YOU did.

You just thrash around confusing weather with climate, cherry picking specific locations, cherry picking specific start and end years (months even)... and when your posts are exposed as the POS they are, you just go off on another tack.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[Reply]Well, let's see. The most accurate theory in the entire history of science is quantum mechanics. However, no-one can predict exactly when a radioactive atom will decay. No-one can predict which slit an single electron will go through in a double slit experiment....

Our knowledge of fluid mechanics is so good that we can use it to design Mach 3 aircraft and airliners that can fly 1/2 way around the world... yet no-one can predict exactly how a flag will flap in the wind.



I'd suggest that you read up on global climate modeling and how the inherent chaos in the weather is filtered out by GCMs.

Weather - chaotic
Climate - has some chaotic components

Quit confusing the two.


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Who said anything about North America?

Brenthutch: "The average temperature for the contiguous U.S. during March was 40.5°F, 1.0°F below the 20th century average. . . . Record cold caused by record warming."

Awaiting a most excellent backpedal/denial.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

***Why then do we have fewer tornados, hurricanes, floods, wildfires, droughts, tropical diseases, and MORE polar bears?



It's been pointed out to you before but apparently you forgot: North America is NOT the world.

www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/431px_width/public/January-2014-Land-and-Ocean-Temperature-Percentiles.gif?itok=4NRnRMyw

www.ncdc.noaa.gov/news/ncdc-releases-february-2014-global-climate-report

robertscribbler.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/nasa-march-3rd-hottest.gif

This is the relavent post. As you can clearly see, I made no mention of North America.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
brenthutch



This is the relavent post. As you can clearly see, I made no mention of North America.



I refer you to post #654 of this thread, in which YOU wrote:
Quote

"The average temperature for the contiguous U.S. during March was 40.5°F, 1.0°F below the 20th century average. This was the 43rd coldest March on record, and the coldest since 2002.
Below-average temperatures dominated the eastern half of the contiguous U.S. during March. The largest departures from average occurred across the Great Lakes and Northeast, where nine states had temperatures that ranked among their 10 coldest on record. The persistent cold resulted in nearly two-thirds of the Great Lakes remaining frozen into early April.
Vermont had its coldest March on record, with a statewide temperature of 18.3°F, 8.9°F below average. The previous coldest March in Vermont occurred in 1916 when the monthly average temperature was 18.6°F.
Maine and New Hampshire each had their second coldest March on record, while Michigan and New York had their fifth coldest. Massachusetts and Wisconsin had their eighth coldest March, Connecticut its ninth coldest, and Pennsylvania its 10th coldest."



You seem to have a hard time recognizing which places are in North America,
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
brenthutch

I didn't WRITE anything, I quoted the climate scientists at NOAA. As I have already pointed out, the relevant post made no mention of North America. By all means continue to grasp at straws.



And I wrote:

"As usual, brenthutch confuses the contiguous USA with the world and one month's weather with climate. "

And your cut and pasted passage is clear indication of this.:P

Continue to wriggle.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0