0
kallend

States with most gun violence

Recommended Posts

I was a little confused to see, for example, Arizona listed as 4th when the three major violence stats were ranked 13th, 16th, and 19th for that state.

Quote

Based on data provided by the Center for American Progress [a progressive think tank that supports gun control], 24/7 Wall St. analyzed the 10 states with the most gun violence. These rankings were based on 10 different criteria, including 2010 firearm homicide deaths per 100,000 people and 2011 firearm-related aggravated assaults. Calculated by the Center, the average rank among all states for each criteria was used to determine the ranking.



Averaging rankings is dumb... here's a map of the actual report

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
champu

I was a little confused to see, for example, Arizona listed as 4th when the three major violence stats were ranked 13th, 16th, and 19th for that state.

Quote

Based on data provided by the Center for American Progress [a progressive think tank that supports gun control], 24/7 Wall St. analyzed the 10 states with the most gun violence. These rankings were based on 10 different criteria, including 2010 firearm homicide deaths per 100,000 people and 2011 firearm-related aggravated assaults. Calculated by the Center, the average rank among all states for each criteria was used to determine the ranking.



Averaging rankings is dumb...



Yes.

How would YOU do it?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

***
Averaging rankings is dumb...



Yes.

How would YOU do it?

well, if they only saw 3 criteria worth noting, then you average on those 3. (or for the less lazy, add the actual numbers for those 3, do the division against population, and then reorder. It would take a computer a couple hundred milliseconds to accomplish)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bakerjan


but these all refer to homicides, not murder, right?

So wouldn't these numbers also include self defense and police shootings?

Wasn't their some famous person who said there are liers, damn liers and statistics?

Jan

Aren't shootings by police or in self defense themselves indicators of gun violence? (Of course, we'd have to remember the NYPD shoots people for holding a wallet, but in general...)
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

Aren't shootings by police or in self defense themselves indicators of gun violence?



Not necessarily. If a citizen is accosted by a thug with a knife and shoots him in self-defense, would you categorize that as knife violence or gun violence?
Provoking a reaction isn't the same thing as saying something meaningful.
-Calvin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And ]THIS [/url] is about perception of the residents of cities, rather than violent crime rate.

While [url "http://247wallst.com/special-report/2013/10/04/the-most-dangerous-states-in-america/2/">These
are the states with the highest violent crime rates overall.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lefty

***Aren't shootings by police or in self defense themselves indicators of gun violence?



Not necessarily. If a citizen is accosted by a thug with a knife and shoots him in self-defense, would you categorize that as knife violence or gun violence?

Wouldn't it be both?

Just because most would see the outcome as positive does not negate the fact it is violence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lefty

***Aren't shootings by police or in self defense themselves indicators of gun violence?



Not necessarily. If a citizen is accosted by a thug with a knife and shoots him in self-defense, would you categorize that as knife violence or gun violence?

Does the word "indicator" mean anything to you?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bakerjan


but these all refer to homicides, not murder, right?

So wouldn't these numbers also include self defense and police shootings?

Wasn't their some famous person who said there are liers, damn liers and statistics?

Jan

Will Rogers, IIRC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
winsor


but these all refer to homicides, not murder, right?

So wouldn't these numbers also include self defense and police shootings?

Wasn't their some famous person who said there are liers, damn liers and statistics?

Jan

Will Rogers, IIRC.

I think the word was "liars".
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SkyDekker


Just because most would see the outcome as positive does not negate the fact it is violence.



if a cop or a citizen justifiably kill someone in self defense, yeah, I think you can record that as 'violence.' And of course have that subcategory for justifiable homicide.

I'm struggling a bit however, with calling it gun violence or knife violence, or taser violence. If the killing is justified, does it matter how it was done?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rhaig

***
While These are the states with the highest violent crime rates overall.



While it is not a state, it's interesting to note that DC beats out the number 1 on that list by more than a factor of two at 1,330.2 violent crimes per 100K population.

is the resident population of DC the appropriate figure to use? Between employees living in the surrounding states along with tourists, the effective population of DC is substantially higher.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I'm struggling a bit however, with calling it gun violence or knife violence, or taser violence. If the killing is justified, does it matter how it was done?



Yes


Licking the knife after cutting out his liver during a justifiable homicide may indicate some other issues :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kelpdiver


is the resident population of DC the appropriate figure to use? Between employees living in the surrounding states along with tourists, the effective population of DC is substantially higher.



fair point. with the correlating question: how much of the crime in the 2010 UCR was against residents vs transients (employees and tourists)
--
Rob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0