More evidence that indicates liberals know they can’t win an election honestly

[rushmc 23]

http://nypost.com/2013/11/18/census-faked-2012-election-jobs-report/

Remember how big a deal was made of the unemployment numbers?
If I remember correctly many (including Rush Limbaugh) predicted that the number would majically fall below 8% shortly before the election? And then questioned the numbers as they came out
Guess what
He and others were right!!

Quote

And a knowledgeable source says the deception went beyond that one employee — that it escalated at the time President Obama was seeking reelection in 2012 and continues today.

“He’s not the only one,” said the source, who asked to remain anonymous for now but is willing to talk with the Labor Department and Congress if asked.

The Census employee caught faking the results is Julius Buckmon, according to confidential Census documents obtained by The Post. Buckmon told me in an interview this past weekend that he was told to make up information by higher-ups at Census.

Ironically, it was Labor’s demanding standards that left the door open to manipulation.

Labor requires Census to achieve a 90 percent success rate on its interviews — meaning it needed to reach 9 out of 10 households targeted and report back on their jobs status.

Census currently has six regions from which surveys are conducted. The New York and Philadelphia regions, I’m told, had been coming up short of the 90 percent.

Philadelphia filled the gap with fake interviews.

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[RonD1120 62]

Conservatives believe the truth will prevail. The liberals are laughing all the way to the bank. Prepare for America 2017, prepare for SHTF.

ETA: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism_Is_a_Mental_Disorder

Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.

[Lefty 0]

If true, I'd say an asterisk next to Obama's name in the history books is warranted. Can't hit those political home runs without using some PEDs.

Provoking a reaction isn't the same thing as saying something meaningful.
-Calvin

[kelpdiver 2]

Not sure why you would want to start such a thread when you have GOP folks on record admitting the motivation behind 'voter fraud laws' is to disenfranchise likely Democratic voters.

[davjohns 1]

You might want to re-word that. I'll look it up to see if anyone said something about discouraging or disenfranchise legal voters who would likely vote democrat. The way you worded it could mean they wanted to disenfranchise illegal voters (say, illegal aliens, actual fraudulent voters, etc.) because those illegal voters are likely to vote democrat.

I got a chuckle.

I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet..

But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

[kelpdiver 2]

davjohns

You might want to re-word that.

No need. Rarely has a party been so transparent with its disdain for democracy. It's hard to defend disenfranchising thousands to stop a finger count of suspect votes, but they did it...at least until some finally couldn't abide by it any longer.

[rushmc 23]

davjohns

You might want to re-word that. I'll look it up to see if anyone said something about discouraging or disenfranchise legal voters who would likely vote democrat. The way you worded it could mean they wanted to disenfranchise illegal voters (say, illegal aliens, actual fraudulent voters, etc.) because those illegal voters are likely to vote democrat.

I got a chuckle.

I got an even bigger chuckle out of his reply to you

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[rickjump1 0]

kelpdiver

Not sure why you would want to start such a thread when you have GOP folks on record admitting the motivation behind 'voter fraud laws' is to disenfranchise likely Democratic voters.

....who vote multiple times and brag about it.

Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts.

[CanuckInUSA 0]

Quote

Rarely has a party been so transparent with its disdain for democracy.

Both sides are guilty for their shenanigans. However aren't you just a little concerned when one side is back by the bureaucracy who are supposed to be impartial and is also protected from their friends in the media? Without doubt there are cases where people from one side of the fence are acting like idiots and you shake your head asking yourself "and they want me to support them, why?", and they are rightfully are being blasted for being fools that they are in the media. But then someone from the other side of the fence is doing something equally abhorrent but the bureaucracy and the media sweep it under the rug "nothing to see here folks, move along".

Try not to worry about the things you have no control over

[kallend 2,148]

So how do you explain away the gerrymandered congressional districts that allowed the GOP to win the majority of seats in the House while having over 1 MILLION fewer votes than the Dems in the House elections?

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[grimmie 186]

http://www.salon.com/2012/08/16/repeal_the_17th_amendment/

hmmm...

[kelpdiver 2]

CanuckInUSA

Quote

Rarely has a party been so transparent with its disdain for democracy.

Both sides are guilty for their shenanigans. However aren't you just a little concerned when one side is back by the bureaucracy who are supposed to be impartial and is also protected from their friends in the media?

Which side is backed by the bureaucracy? Voting is conducted by the individual states, so if there is a side, it is the party of the Governor.

This media protection you're referring is a bit of a fantasy as well. Jon Stewart has been ripping Obama for weeks, for example. If the media coverage of voting politics seems left leaning, it's because the GOP has been so brazen in their attempts.

I think you'll need to be more explicit with an example here. Are we talking about Gore's attempt to kill the military vote in Florida in 2000, or something more?

[rushmc 23]

kallend

So how do you explain away the gerrymandered congressional districts that allowed the GOP to win the majority of seats in the House while having over 1 MILLION fewer votes than the Dems in the House elections?

Really??
You want to go here?

Gerrymandering has been going on for decades yet NOW you blame this?

Fucking hilarious John

The answer is very very easy
You sure you want to go here??

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[rushmc 23]

grimmie

http://www.salon.com/2012/08/16/repeal_the_17th_amendment/

hmmm...

I is a valid debate to have
Nothing to do with voter suppression however

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[CanuckInUSA 0]

Quote

I think you'll need to be more explicit with an example here.

Jon Stewart is a dipshit elitist media asswipe.

Rod Ford is an idiot, he is a liar and the voters of Toronto have every right to throw Ford out on to the streets in 2014 when his term comes to an end. But for Stewart to mock people recently seen at a football game showing their support for Ford, just shows what a elitist asswipe Stewart is. It's one thing for Stewart to mock the idiot mayor (there is no shortage of material for Stewart to use here), but it is another thing for Stewart to mock the mayor's supporters. The people of Toronto did not elect Ford because he was this eloquent media friendly public speaker who looks fantastic in front of the cameras. The people elected Ford to put an end to the Progressive's Culture of Entitlement and despite all of Ford's personal flaws, he has taken the city in the right direction in trying to put an end to all this waste. However I have said enough about Jon Stewart. He is in the USA and it is well known that Americans really don't know or care about what is going on outside of the USA.

FYI ...

There is a sitting mayor in London Ontario right now who has been criminally charged with fraud. Millions of dollars were funneled from a charity he setup into the pockets of his closest associates. Revenue Canada finally removed the charitable status of this organization after numerous abnormal red flags were thrown up. On top of that this sitting mayor billed the tax payers for thousands of dollars to pay for his son's wedding. Does the media hound this mayor asking him to explain his criminal behavior? Does the media harassing this mayor at his home? Does the media harass the mayor's children publishing pictures of them as they trick or treat? Does the media demand that this mayor step down? Of course not. This mayor is Joe Fontana, former Liberal MP and Cabinet Minister in Paul Martin's Liberal Government. There is nothing to see here folks. Move along ...

The media bias does exist, it is real and I am sorry if you are too closed minded to see it.

Try not to worry about the things you have no control over

[kelpdiver 2]

CanuckInUSA

Quote

I think you'll need to be more explicit with an example here.

[removed a silly rant and an irrelevant example of supposed media bias in Canada]

The media bias does exist, it is real and I am sorry if you are too closed minded to see it.

So you don't have an example of Democratic election tampering that the media covered up?

Media in America has historically had very conservative ownership, and more liberal reporters. Guess who maintains editorial decision making? Dan Qualye's grandfather, as an example, owned a significant chunk of the newspapers across the country.

In any event, we now have Fox News and a billion bloggers to get news out. There's no suppression of anything. And despite your hurt Canuck feelings clouding your judgement about Stewart, the fact is that he will mock everyone that does stupid shit. And Ford...man, he's just a goldmine. If you're happy having Marrion Barry II as your mayor, good for you. But we're going to laugh, the same way we did at the San Diego mayor and Anthony Weiner.

[kelpdiver 2]

kallend

So how do you explain away the gerrymandered congressional districts that allowed the GOP to win the majority of seats in the House while having over 1 MILLION fewer votes than the Dems in the House elections?

There are many plausible explanations for such an outcome, so it cannot alone support your assertion. Gerrymandering has been a bipartisan game in most states, with a slight advantage given to the party in power of each state around census time. The members of the minority party, however, seem content to accept safe districts in exchange for allowing the majority to protect their lead.

[rushmc 23]

kelpdiver

***

Quote

I think you'll need to be more explicit with an example here.

[removed a silly rant and an irrelevant example of supposed media bias in Canada]

The media bias does exist, it is real and I am sorry if you are too closed minded to see it.

So you don't have an example of Democratic election tampering that the media covered up?

Media in America has historically had very conservative ownership, and more liberal reporters. Guess who maintains editorial decision making? Dan Qualye's grandfather, as an example, owned a significant chunk of the newspapers across the country.

In any event, we now have Fox News and a billion bloggers to get news out. There's no suppression of anything. And despite your hurt Canuck feelings clouding your judgement about Stewart, the fact is that he will mock everyone that does stupid shit. And Ford...man, he's just a goldmine. If you're happy having Marrion Barry II as your mayor, good for you. But we're going to laugh, the same way we did at the San Diego mayor and Anthony Weiner.

If Bush had gone to a similar church as Obama (preaching topics and style) Do you think the media would have not reported it?

How about if Bush or Romney had a friend the likes of Bill Aires? How about that?

How hard did the media look and bribe to get Bush's grades and other college info? Doing any of that for Barry?

Also, the low information voters do not go to blogs or veiw cable news. IF they get any news at all it is from the likes of CBS, NBC, Public TV or ABC. All just as supportive of Bush and Romney as Obama, right?

These are just a couple that quickly come to mind
Please, join the us in the real world

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[CanuckInUSA 0]

Quote

espite your hurt Canuck feelings clouding your judgement about Stewart, the fact is that he will mock everyone that does stupid shit. And Ford...man, he's just a goldmine. If you're happy having Marrion Barry II as your mayor, good for you.

You must have missed the part where I said Rob Ford is an idiot, a liar and it was one thing for Stewart to mock the idiot mayor but another thing for Stewart to mock the mayor's supporters at the football game like he just did the other night on one of his shows. I don't think Jon Stewart is a dipshit elitist for mocking Rob Ford. No Jon Stewart is a dipshit elitist for mocking people who support Ford (if you or Stewart are incapable for understanding why a man such as Ford became mayor, there is no point me trying to explain that here).

Oh and Ford is not my mayor. I don't even live remotely close to Toronto. No my mayor is another joke. In fact he is a tax and spend progressive, a gay Muslim and darling of the media (imagine that Calgary Alberta has a gay Muslim mayor, it's nirvana for the Progressive media) and he is currently being sued for Defamation and expecting the tax payers to pay for his loose lips. He could have easily just said "I am sorry I didn't really mean to say that, I wasn't thinking" and avoided this mess. But he is a narcissus, and he has never been challenged by his media pals. I don't give a rats ass about him being a Muslim nor do I care that he is gay. But I have severe issues with his spending policies and even bigger issues with his attempts to socially engineer everyone into his ideology. But don't expect to hear anything negative concerning this lawsuit from the media. In fact in the few stories about this lawsuit that have made it to the media, it's all the other guy's fault. Nothing to see here folks, please move along. Of course this mayor was recently democratically elected (only about 20% of eligible voters turned out to vote because the media smeared the one candidate who had any chance to beat their darling candidate). So I must wait 4 more years before we get another chance to oust him. I believe in democracy, I can accept democracy even with all those complacent absent voters. But I don't believe in media witch hunts and I will speak out against the bias media, despite your claim that the media is on the level.

Try not to worry about the things you have no control over

[DanG 1]

Quote

If Bush had gone to a similar church as Obama (preaching topics and style) Do you think the media would have not reported it?

How about if Bush or Romney had a friend the likes of Bill Aires? How about that?

Yeah, the media's done such a good job of covering that up. So good that fucking everyone has heard of it, and heard about ad nauseum before both elections.

Quote

Also, the low information voters do not go to blogs or veiw cable news. IF they get any news at all it is from the likes of CBS, NBC, Public TV or ABC. All just as supportive of Bush and Romney as Obama, right?

Seriously? "Low information voters" (your current mantra) watch the PBS News Hour? Are you really arguing that people who watch ABC, CBS, and NBC are low information voters, but people who watch Fox are not?

- Dan G

[rushmc 23]

DanG

Seriously? "Low information voters" (your current mantra) watch the PBS News Hour? Are you really arguing that people who watch ABC, CBS, and NBC are low information voters, but people who watch Fox are not?

If the Foo shits ........

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[yoink 321]

DanG

\

Seriously? "Low information voters" (your current mantra) watch the PBS News Hour? Are you really arguing that people who watch ABC, CBS, and NBC are low information voters, but people who watch Fox are not?

C'mon man! It has to be the right information to be considered, obviously!

[rushmc 23]

yoink

***\

Seriously? "Low information voters" (your current mantra) watch the PBS News Hour? Are you really arguing that people who watch ABC, CBS, and NBC are low information voters, but people who watch Fox are not?

C'mon man! It has to be the right information to be considered, obviously!

Well, I have been right about Obama

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[grimmie 186]

rushmc

******

Quote

I think you'll need to be more explicit with an example here.

[removed a silly rant and an irrelevant example of supposed media bias in Canada]

The media bias does exist, it is real and I am sorry if you are too closed minded to see it.

So you don't have an example of Democratic election tampering that the media covered up?

Media in America has historically had very conservative ownership, and more liberal reporters. Guess who maintains editorial decision making? Dan Qualye's grandfather, as an example, owned a significant chunk of the newspapers across the country.

In any event, we now have Fox News and a billion bloggers to get news out. There's no suppression of anything. And despite your hurt Canuck feelings clouding your judgement about Stewart, the fact is that he will mock everyone that does stupid shit. And Ford...man, he's just a goldmine. If you're happy having Marrion Barry II as your mayor, good for you. But we're going to laugh, the same way we did at the San Diego mayor and Anthony Weiner.

If Bush had gone to a similar church as Obama (preaching topics and style) Do you think the media would have not reported it?

How about if Bush or Romney had a friend the likes of Bill Aires? How about that?
Bush had Rummy and Cheney, way scarier than Ayers.
Romney had McCain's advisors and sme of the old PNAC crowd around. Scary.

How hard did the media look and bribe to get Bush's grades and other college info? Doing any of that for Barry?

It seems GWB's military record, or lack of, was the big deal.

Also, the low information voters do not go to blogs or veiw cable news. IF they get any news at all it is from the likes of CBS, NBC, Public TV or ABC. All just as supportive of Bush and Romney as Obama, right?

GWB had the support of the ENTIRE media world after September 11th. Remember? He screwed that up royally.

Romney kept flip flopping and tripping over his own words with no real plan.

These are just a couple that quickly come to mind
Please, join the us in the real world

[rushmc 23]

Bush messed up?

You are a child of the main stream media and drive by reporters for sure

(anyway, I think that is some of what you posted in the reply)

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln