turtlespeed 226 #1 October 3, 2013 Harry Reid: No, we won’t agree to fund NIH in order to restart treatment for kids with cancer HARRY REID: WHY WOULD WE SAVE CHILDREN WITH CANCER WHEN FEDERAL EMPLOYEES ARE HURTING? Harry Reid: “Why Would We Want To” Help One Child With Cancer By Only Funding NIH? Video wasn't it Reid that said something, while he was pushing Obamacare, along the lines of "If we could save just one child with cancer, it would be worth it." hmmmmmI'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2 October 3, 2013 turtlespeed wasn't it Reid that said something, while he was pushing Obamacare, along the lines of "If we could save just one child with cancer, it would be worth it." hmmmmm Different day Different politcal windows/agendas"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Channman 2 #3 October 3, 2013 turtlespeed Harry Reid: No, we won’t agree to fund NIH in order to restart treatment for kids with cancer HARRY REID: WHY WOULD WE SAVE CHILDREN WITH CANCER WHEN FEDERAL EMPLOYEES ARE HURTING? Harry Reid: “Why Would We Want To” Help One Child With Cancer By Only Funding NIH? Video wasn't it Reid that said something, while he was pushing Obamacare, along the lines of "If we could save just one child with cancer, it would be worth it." hmmmmm You answer is simple: Call 1-800-FUCKYO, YEP it's the real number Bro for Obama Care. Damn, I'm telling you...you can't make this crap up.Reid is a pissy, mean old man. The guy in the community that yell at little kids to get the F off his grass. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rickjump1 0 #4 October 3, 2013 It's a wonder he hasn't "put a tarp over Mount Rushmore" or "banned people from looking down at the Grand Canyon". If he fucks with WWII vets, they will give him a blanket party.Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LyraM45 0 #5 October 3, 2013 turtlespeed Harry Reid: No, we won’t agree to fund NIH in order to restart treatment for kids with cancer HARRY REID: WHY WOULD WE SAVE CHILDREN WITH CANCER WHEN FEDERAL EMPLOYEES ARE HURTING? Harry Reid: “Why Would We Want To” Help One Child With Cancer By Only Funding NIH? Video wasn't it Reid that said something, while he was pushing Obamacare, along the lines of "If we could save just one child with cancer, it would be worth it." hmmmmm And the question is from a CNN rep-- I thought they were the liberal, biased, so far left you can't go anymore left and have pioneered the way for the liberal slant in main steam media now adays? Figured they only lobbed softball questions to democrats! Back on topic-- I watched the exchange yesterday. Obviously I think what he was probably trying to say did not come out correctly. It sounds harsh, but when they start picking and choosing what to fund and not to fund, I get what he is trying to say. He funds NIH, and somebody else is going to turn around and say "but what about us? We're hanging out to dry."Apologies for the spelling (and grammar).... I got a B.S, not a B.A. :) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #6 October 3, 2013 LyraM45 And the question is from a CNN rep-- I thought they were the liberal, biased, so far left you can't go anymore left and have pioneered the way for the liberal slant in main steam media now adays? Figured they only lobbed softball questions to democrats! Back on topic-- I watched the exchange yesterday. Obviously I think what he was probably trying to say did not come out correctly. It sounds harsh, but when they start picking and choosing what to fund and not to fund, I get what he is trying to say. He funds NIH, and somebody else is going to turn around and say "but what about us? We're hanging out to dry." I believe you are talking about ABC, CBS, & ABC but mostly MSNBC. CNN is as close to central as the networks get, it just doesn't Kinda like this: Other Networks . . . . . .Cnn . . . . . . . . .. .Center . . . . . . . . .Fox NewsI'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
devildog 0 #7 October 4, 2013 turtlespeed *** And the question is from a CNN rep-- I thought they were the liberal, biased, so far left you can't go anymore left and have pioneered the way for the liberal slant in main steam media now adays? Figured they only lobbed softball questions to democrats! Back on topic-- I watched the exchange yesterday. Obviously I think what he was probably trying to say did not come out correctly. It sounds harsh, but when they start picking and choosing what to fund and not to fund, I get what he is trying to say. He funds NIH, and somebody else is going to turn around and say "but what about us? We're hanging out to dry." I believe you are talking about ABC, CBS, & ABC but mostly MSNBC. CNN is as close to central as the networks get, it just doesn't Kinda like this: Other Networks . . . . . .Cnn . . . . . . . . .. .Center . . . . . . . . .Fox News You're giving CNN way too much credit. They run with just as much crap as the others.You stop breathing for a few minutes and everyone jumps to conclusions. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
