Obamacare Opt Out WARNING!

[kallend 2,147]

DaVinci

***
Pointing out that you engage in selective editing to change the context of another person's post is NOT a personal attack. It just describes what you did.

Yawn.... The fact is you lack facts and the best you can do is debate semantics.

Changing the context of someone else's post by selective editing is not semantics, it's intellectual dishonesty.

This applies across the board, not ONLY to you.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[DaVinci 0]

kallend

******
Pointing out that you engage in selective editing to change the context of another person's post is NOT a personal attack. It just describes what you did.

Yawn.... The fact is you lack facts and the best you can do is debate semantics.

Changing the context of someone else's post by selective editing is not semantics, it's intellectual dishonesty.

This applies across the board, not ONLY to you.

Debating semantics is intellectual dishonesty. This also applies to others, not only YOU.

[JohnnyMarko 1]

DaVinci

*********
Pointing out that you engage in selective editing to change the context of another person's post is NOT a personal attack. It just describes what you did.

Yawn.... The fact is you lack facts and the best you can do is debate semantics.

Changing the context of someone else's post by selective editing is not semantics, it's intellectual dishonesty.

This applies across the board, not ONLY to you.

Debating semantics is intellectual. This applies to only YOU.

I disagree

[kallend 2,147]

DaVinci

*********
Pointing out that you engage in selective editing to change the context of another person's post is NOT a personal attack. It just describes what you did.

Yawn.... The fact is you lack facts and the best you can do is debate semantics.

Changing the context of someone else's post by selective editing is not semantics, it's intellectual dishonesty.

This applies across the board, not ONLY to you.

Debating semantics is intellectual dishonesty. This also applies to others, not only YOU.

Keep digging, you'll soon strike oil.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[DaVinci 0]

kallend

************
Pointing out that you engage in selective editing to change the context of another person's post is NOT a personal attack. It just describes what you did.

Yawn.... The fact is you lack facts and the best you can do is debate semantics.

Changing the context of someone else's post by selective editing is not semantics, it's intellectual dishonesty.

This applies across the board, not ONLY to you.

Debating semantics is intellectual dishonesty. This also applies to others, not only YOU.

Keep digging, you'll soon strike oil.

Keep going after the poster and ignoring the topic.... One day we might actually thing you made a point.

It might happen.... If we are drunk and sleep deprived one day.

[kallend 2,147]

DaVinci

***************
Pointing out that you engage in selective editing to change the context of another person's post is NOT a personal attack. It just describes what you did.

Yawn.... The fact is you lack facts and the best you can do is debate semantics.

Changing the context of someone else's post by selective editing is not semantics, it's intellectual dishonesty.

This applies across the board, not ONLY to you.

Debating semantics is intellectual dishonesty. This also applies to others, not only YOU.

Keep digging, you'll soon strike oil.

Keep going after the poster and ignoring the topic.... One day we might actually thing you made a point.

It might happen.... If we are drunk and sleep deprived one day.

Changing the context of someone else's post by selective editing is intellectual dishonesty. Wriggle and weasel all you want, that IS what it is.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[billvon 3,111]

Both of you - enough.