The ACLU should absolutely sue the people that mocked the President!

[jakee 1,596]

Quote

The thread title says the ACLU "SHOULD" sue.

Does that count as mentioning the ACLU? If your answer is no, please explain your working.

Quote

Not that they are.

Where did I say he said they are?

If you hadn't made it so clear you're anti-cannabis I'd ask for some of what you're smoking.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[Gravitymaster 0]

Well, you better stub that joint out because obviously you cannot remember what you said.

Quote

Oh ok. So can you point me to the story which connects the ACLU to the clown?

He never connected the ACLU to the clown. He was expressing a sarcastic OPINION.

Now go ahead and try and weasel out of it as usual.

[jakee 1,596]

Quote

He never connected the ACLU to the clown. He was expressing a sarcastic OPINION.

About the ACLU and the clown. (Damn, that's complicated - I'm not surprised you got confused)

And the statement, like I said, does the ACLU a disservice since that course of action would be the exact opposite of what they exist to do.


(And have you figured out yet if starting a thread title with "The ACLU" counts as mentioning the ACLU? If so, you should go and help Turtlespeed with his memory.)

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[Gravitymaster 0]

jakee

Quote

He never connected the ACLU to the clown. He was expressing a sarcastic OPINION.

About the ACLU and the clown. (Damn, that's complicated - I'm not surprised you got confused)

And the statement, like I said, does the ACLU a disservice since that course of action would be the exact opposite of what they exist to do.


(And have you figured out yet if starting a thread title with "The ACLU" counts as mentioning the ACLU? If so, you should go and help Turtlespeed with his memory.)

Weasel..weasel..weasel.......

[jakee 1,596]

You do what you want dude, I'd have prefered a real conversation.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[rushmc 23]

jakee

You do what you want dude, I'd have prefered a real conversation.

Then YOU should have had one

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[Gravitymaster 0]

rushmc

***You do what you want dude, I'd have prefered a real conversation.

Then YOU should have had one

He will as soon as he figures out how to get his Foot out of his mouth.

[jakee 1,596]

rushmc

***You do what you want dude, I'd have prefered a real conversation.

Then YOU should have had one

When someone won't admit to writing the title of their own thread it does start to get difficult, y'dig?

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[rushmc 23]

jakee

******You do what you want dude, I'd have prefered a real conversation.

Then YOU should have had one

When someone won't admit to writing the title of their own thread it does start to get difficult, y'dig?

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[jakee 1,596]

Quote

walks away

Good move.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[Gravitymaster 0]

rushmc

*********You do what you want dude, I'd have prefered a real conversation.

Then YOU should have had one

When someone won't admit to writing the title of their own thread it does start to get difficult, y'dig?



Pretty funny isn't he?

[kallend 2,150]

Gravitymaster

************I thought he was pretty clear. I am actually surprised there are some who didn't have a clue about what he was referring to.

Oh ok. So can you point me to the story which connects the ACLU to the clown?

Are you that hapless?

So you can't. Easier to just say that, I'd have thought.

Sigh....please show where is said the ACLU was going to sue.

Let me help you out here. He didn't say that, He simply expressed a sarcastic opinion.

Understand now?

The question was "And where's the story about the ACLU?". Nothing about where did he say ACLU was going to sue.

Your response is as stupid as the OP.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[masterrig 1]

kallend

***************I thought he was pretty clear. I am actually surprised there are some who didn't have a clue about what he was referring to.

Oh ok. So can you point me to the story which connects the ACLU to the clown?

Are you that hapless?

So you can't. Easier to just say that, I'd have thought.

Sigh....please show where is said the ACLU was going to sue.

Let me help you out here. He didn't say that, He simply expressed a sarcastic opinion.

Understand now?

The question was "And where's the story about the ACLU?". Nothing about where did he say ACLU was going to sue.

Your response is as stupid as the OP.

This is all just too funny.


Chuck

[Gravitymaster 0]

kallend

***************I thought he was pretty clear. I am actually surprised there are some who didn't have a clue about what he was referring to.

Oh ok. So can you point me to the story which connects the ACLU to the clown?

Are you that hapless?

So you can't. Easier to just say that, I'd have thought.

Sigh....please show where is said the ACLU was going to sue.

Let me help you out here. He didn't say that, He simply expressed a sarcastic opinion.

Understand now?

The question was "And where's the story about the ACLU?". Nothing about where did he say ACLU was going to sue.

Your response is as stupid as the OP.

We'll just put you down as another one who doesn't understand what was said. Either they or its willful ignorance.

[turtlespeed 226]

Gravitymaster

***""? "Seriously?"? "Never mentioned the ACLU . . ."?

Try reading the title of your thread, and see if you're man enough to apologise. Fucking hilarious!

Quote

It appears that even though this is a case of civil liberty abuse and possible denial

Is it?

You are the one that's absolutely hilarious.

The thread title says the ACLU "SHOULD" sue.

Not that they are.

(Bolding because we are cutting you slack because you are a furiner)

I'll apologize.

I'm sorry you are having trouble understanding.

There is no story regarding the ACLU. That in its self is the story.

Perhaps an ESL course?

Now can we stop the bickering and discuss why the ACLU is silent when the clown gets his constitutional rights trampled on?

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[DaVinci 0]

Clearly showing the double standard....

Make fun of Bush = No issue
Make fun of Obama using the same basic tactics = All hell to pay.

Just like:
Use a legally owned gun to defend yourself = You are a racist
Three black kids jump and beat a white kid on a bus = Nothing to see here, move along.

[jakee 1,596]

Quote

Perhaps an ESL course?

No, you need something more fundamental than that. Claiming poor english skills doesn't excuse you for claiming that you
never mentioned the ACLU in a thread that you titled "The ACLU..."

It's a level of stubborness and sheer determined denial of reality that I don't think I've ever seen here before, and that's saying something.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[turtlespeed 226]

jakee

Quote

Perhaps an ESL course?

No, you need something more fundamental than that. Claiming poor english skills doesn't excuse you for claiming that you
never mentioned the ACLU in a thread that you titled "The ACLU..."

It's a level of stubborness and sheer determined denial of reality that I don't think I've ever seen here before, and that's saying something.

1. The title of the thread has ACLU in it.
2. The body does not.
3. The reason the body doesn't have reference is be cause there is hypocricy in the way the ACLU does business.
4. You don't seem to be able to argue anything but a perceived discrepancy
5. This thread has nothing to do with what you want to argue about.

Anymore questions?

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[Gravitymaster 0]

jakee

Quote

Perhaps an ESL course?

No, you need something more fundamental than that. Claiming poor english skills doesn't excuse you for claiming that you
never mentioned the ACLU in a thread that you titled "The ACLU..."

It's a level of stubborness and sheer determined denial of reality that I don't think I've ever seen here before, and that's saying something.

That's because you apparently lack the capability to understand what he said. It seemed pretty obvious to me. I suspect you would be less frustrated if you would open you mind a little and stop reading things in to what you think he was referring to. Not that I think you will.

[jakee 1,596]

Quote

Anymore questions?

Yes. When you said "I never mentioned the ACLU" were you right or were you wrong?

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[turtlespeed 226]

jakee

Quote

Anymore questions?

Yes. When you said "I never mentioned the ACLU" were you right or were you wrong?

I was wrong in that it was in the subject.

Do you have anything to add or are you so singleminded that you keep debating nothing g to do with the original post?

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[Gravitymaster 0]

Some people have a hard time admitting they are wrong. Some people need to pick fights because it gives them the self-validation that their ego craves.

[Kennedy 0]

What is your opinion of the rodeo clowns mocking the president?
What is your opinion of the outrage and response from NAACP and left leaning orgs?

witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

[turtlespeed 226]

Kennedy

What is your opinion of the rodeo clowns mocking the president?
What is your opinion of the outrage and response from NAACP and left leaning orgs?

To: Jakee

You are cordially invited to answer any, or all of the following questions.

1) Why do you think that the Clown is being banned?
2) Why didn't the same treatment exist when Bush and Reagan were mocked?
3) What does this response to the Clown suggest about Missouri's idea of the First Amendment?
4) Do you think it is hypocritical for one president to be defended like this while another was not?
5) Why is there such a lack of response or comment from the ACLU?

The above questions have been listed numerically for your convenience.
We understand that it may be difficult for you to ferret out the underlying, pertinent questions, while you are so engrossed in anxiety about how the ACLU was mentioned in the thread title, and not in the body of the post, so we did the work for you.

Please let us know how else we need to coddle you.

Turtle.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[Gravitymaster 0]