kallend 2,180 #26 July 23, 2013 So your reading comprehension sucks. Explains a lot of your posts.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OHCHUTE 0 #27 July 23, 2013 kallend So your reading comprehension sucks. Explains a lot of your posts. Kallend, did you shoot the video? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,180 #28 July 23, 2013 OHCHUTE*** So your reading comprehension sucks. Explains a lot of your posts. Kallend, did you shoot the video? Read the thread.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #29 July 23, 2013 kallend ****** So your reading comprehension sucks. Explains a lot of your posts. Kallend, did you shoot the video? Read the thread. He shot the video before he didn't shoot the video.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #30 July 23, 2013 turtlespeed ********* So your reading comprehension sucks. Explains a lot of your posts. Kallend, did you shoot the video? Read the thread. He shot the video before he didn't shoot the video.Shot at a local snootyYacht Club, no doubt. I wonder if they allow brothers from the Southside in there? I guess that is the "Chicago" our perfesser knows. Figures. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OHCHUTE 0 #31 July 23, 2013 turtlespeed ********* So your reading comprehension sucks. Explains a lot of your posts. Kallend, did you shoot the video? Read the thread. He shot the video before he didn't shoot the video.Yes and after he shot the video he forgot he shot it, OR simply lied that he shot the video. In any event he's gone to a lot of trouble to hide the truth of the matter even when asked directly if he indeed shot the video. So if his intent was to be misunderstood just so that he could claim a bunch of crap about people not understanding him, he's succeeded. The question remains: who shoot the video? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,610 #32 July 23, 2013 A) Why do you care? B) He's only ever said he did shoot the video. C) You're hilarious Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
livendive 8 #33 July 23, 2013 He said he shot the video. He never said he didn't shoot the video. Why do you find this confusing? Blues, Dave"I AM A PROFESSIONAL EXTREME ATHLETE!" (drink Mountain Dew) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #34 July 23, 2013 http://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=c4-overview&list=UU4G3lPPWm6qtoWtRk4vyGwg&v=IIjKA6J2eFY&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DIIjKA6J2eFY%26feature%3Dc4-overview%26list%3DUU4G3lPPWm6qtoWtRk4vyGwg Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,180 #35 July 23, 2013 livendiveHe said he shot the video. He never said he didn't shoot the video. Why do you find this confusing? Blues, Dave I expect he finds it confusing for the same reason he starts stupid threads.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,180 #36 July 23, 2013 turtlespeed ********* So your reading comprehension sucks. Explains a lot of your posts. Kallend, did you shoot the video? Read the thread. He shot the video before he didn't shoot the video.That makes 2 of you who can't comprehend simple English. No wonder you are conservatives.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #37 July 23, 2013 kallend ************ So your reading comprehension sucks. Explains a lot of your posts. Kallend, did you shoot the video? Read the thread. He shot the video before he didn't shoot the video.That makes 2 of you who can't comprehend simple English. No wonder you are conservatives. And here I was going to give you a benefit of the doubt, but, AGAIN, your lack of skill at recognizing sarcasm and facetiousness knows no bounds. It must be a liberal thing.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OHCHUTE 0 #38 July 23, 2013 OHCHUTE: They let you fly a remote powered plane over streets and public buildings? Thought that was illegal. OH forgot: It's Chicago. KALLEND: If you go on Youtube you'll find video taken over every major city. You FAIL yet again. (I failed in what way? And what does videos on Youtube have anything to do with a video you posted on Vimeo?) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OHCHUTE 0 #39 July 23, 2013 And... OHCHUTE: You said you took the video. I don't look around Youtube for sky videos of cities. You need to be more clear when you post a video that the video was not shot by you. You fail for not communicating correctly. KALLEND: Well, you're still WRONG because it isn't illegal unless done for commercial purposes. So Kallend never addresses who shot the video, what I was speaking about and talks about legality of shooting a video, not the same subject. Then he goes on to trash my comprehension. It's pretty clear to me that Kallend was not following the conversation. Pretty typical of liberals to talk in circles. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #40 July 23, 2013 QuoteThat makes 2 of you who can't comprehend simple English. No wonder you are conservatives. I thought personal attacks were not allowed? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,180 #41 July 23, 2013 DaVinciQuoteThat makes 2 of you who can't comprehend simple English. No wonder you are conservatives. I thought personal attacks were not allowed? Are "conservatives" persons? Trolling and repetitive questioning aren't allowed.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #42 July 24, 2013 kallend***QuoteThat makes 2 of you who can't comprehend simple English. No wonder you are conservatives. I thought personal attacks were not allowed? Are "conservatives" persons? Trolling and repetitive questioning aren't allowed.Wrong, insulting posters, as you often do, is considered a Personal Attack. You just simply get a pass because of your political leanings. Everyone know that. Perhaps you have become so accustom to getting away with it, that you have forgotten it's against the forum rules? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,180 #43 July 24, 2013 Gravitymaster******QuoteThat makes 2 of you who can't comprehend simple English. No wonder you are conservatives. I thought personal attacks were not allowed? Are "conservatives" persons? Trolling and repetitive questioning aren't allowed.Wrong, insulting posters, as you often do, is considered a Personal Attack. You just simply get a pass because of your political leanings. Everyone know that. Perhaps you have become so accustom to getting away with it, that you have forgotten it's against the forum rules? When said correspondent has repeatedly failed to understand what was written, and several people have pointed it out, how would you describe it?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OHCHUTE 0 #44 July 24, 2013 kallend*********QuoteThat makes 2 of you who can't comprehend simple English. No wonder you are conservatives. I thought personal attacks were not allowed? Are "conservatives" persons? Trolling and repetitive questioning aren't allowed.Wrong, insulting posters, as you often do, is considered a Personal Attack. You just simply get a pass because of your political leanings. Everyone know that. Perhaps you have become so accustom to getting away with it, that you have forgotten it's against the forum rules? When said correspondent has repeatedly failed to understand what was written, and several people have pointed it out, how would you describe it? A bonfide attempt was made to understand what you did write, even cutting and pasting the dialogue for you to review. Instead of answering the question directly you resorted to name calling. So now that everyone knows you shot the video and you had a legal right to do so due to your work being "commercial" would you mind telling us why you're film good parts of Chicago, and not the bad parts of Chicago in making your point that Chicago is somehow Obama's city? Since you have difficulty answering questions yourself, here are some possible answers you might consider: 1. They'd steal my car if I was in that part of town. 2. I'd get beat up, shot or killed. 3. They'd steal my helicopter that has the video camera on it. 4. Obama told me to take video of only nice parts of the City of Chicago not the SE side riddled with bullet holes and crack houses, for Obama's featured film: OBAMA's City Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #45 July 24, 2013 QuoteAre "conservatives" persons? English 101 stuff: "No wonder you are conservatives." It shows you are talking about the PEOPLE, not a topic. And you are using conservative in a negative light. Very simply it is a personal attack, and I can't help but wonder why you seem to be allowed to use them over and over with nothing ever done? (I know the answer). Here is another example of you talking to another poster: "So your reading comprehension sucks" That is clearly a personal attack.... Yet you get away with it again. Since the mods do not jump on you, you are given free rein and use it anytime a person shows you where you are wrong. Again, the insults are basic english 101 stuff. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
