Pro AGW propentents given their talking points

[rushmc 23]

Seems many here have them already

Quote

Dem Strategy: Climate Change Opponents Must Be 'Ridiculed'

Quote

Democrats have a new plan for pushing climate change legislation that would severely damage the US economy: ridiculing climate change opponents. “These people have to ridiculed,” explained Sen. Brian Schatz (D-HI) to Netroots Nation. “They have to be run out of town rhetorically.” Dave Weigel of Slate.com helpfully reports, “If denying climate change becomes as dangerous to talk about as abortion, voila, they can start tripping up the other side. They needed to try, because nothing else worked.”

Fuck em

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/06/23/Dems-climate-change-ridicule

Quote

Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) agreed with Schatz, stating, “When you make fun of people – here’s an example. In Indiana last year, a conservative candidate lost the Senate race because he said something stupid about rape.” Waxman added that Obama might take unilateral action on climate change. “He’s not running for re-election,” Waxman noted

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[skinnay 0]

Some things deserve to be ridiculed. Science has long been against your views, it's not gonna get any better so you should just deal with it

[rushmc 23]

skinnay

Some things deserve to be ridiculed. Science has long been against your views, it's not gonna get any better so you should just deal with it

You must be on Waxman's mailing list

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[skinnay 0]

Yeah, me and 97% of climate scientists but don't let us dumb libs get in the way of your awesome bible science

[rushmc 23]

skinnay

Yeah, me and 97% of climate scientists but don't let us dumb libs get in the way of your awesome bible science

Hmm

If this is such a slam dunk, why do need these talking points?

Maybe not so much of a slam dunk

Oh, and your 97% number has been cleanly debunked
But dont let that stop you

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[jakee 1,596]

Quote

If this is such a slam dunk, why do need these talking points?

It may surprise you to learn that the comments of a few local American politicians do not equal a PR plan for the global scientific community.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[rushmc 23]

jakee

Quote

If this is such a slam dunk, why do need these talking points?

It may surprise you to learn that the comments of a few local American politicians do not equal a PR plan for the global scientific community.

No surprise at all

But maybe it would surprise you to know that many here USE these talking points and tactics

Wait

It probably doesnt

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[jakee 1,596]

rushmc

But maybe it would surprise you to know that many here USE these talking points and tactics

Yeah, like this guy,

"For nearly ten years I have tried reason, fact, and logic to educate climate alarmists on the dangers of being stupid; after viewing this [[link]] I realize my efforts have been in vain. I will no longer try to change their minds, I will just make fun of them."

And this guy,

"It's good that you are learning not to take them seriously anymore. Eventually, you will learn to ignore their other stupid ideas on economics and social responsibility. "


You replied to that thread, and their "talking points and tactics" didn't seem to bother you. Funny that.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[rushmc 23]

jakee

***But maybe it would surprise you to know that many here USE these talking points and tactics

Yeah, like this guy.

"For nearly ten years I have tried reason, fact, and logic to educate climate alarmists on the dangers of being stupid; after viewing this

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3027058/posts

I realize my efforts have been in vain. I will no longer try to change their minds, I will just make fun of them."


You replied to that thread, and his "talking points and tactics" didn't seem to bother you. Funny that.

So you consider those points as an atemp to degrade someone?

Or it is just a comment based on frustration?

Have you seen him make fun of anyone?

If he does, I would put him in the same boat

But for a much much different reason

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[jakee 1,596]

Quote

So you consider those points as an atemp to degrade someone?

Only if you consider making fun of someone for supposedly being stupid degrading.

Quote

Or it is just a comment based on frustration?

No, it's his SOP.

Quote

Have you seen him make fun of anyone?

Yes. Constantly. And so have you.

Quote

If he does, I would put him in the same boat. But for a much much different reason

Yeah, because you're biased.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[Gravitymaster 0]

That's a pretty damn funny accusation coming from the likes of you. Oh, the hypocrisy.

[jakee 1,596]

Gravitymaster

That's a pretty damn funny accusation coming from the likes of you. Oh, the hypocrisy.

What accusation, bias? He is biased, and the statement becomes no less true if I am as well.

Rush started a thread bemoaning ridicule from one side, and not only has he ignored ridicule from his side in the past, he is making excuses for it right now. If it's hypocrisy you're interested in, have at it.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[lawrocket 3]

Quote

"skinnay"]Science has long been against your views, it's not gonna get any better so you should just deal with it

Note the need to ridicule the deniers. That's because the climate science community has shot itself in the foot. So when the President releases his new revenue enhancement program tomorrow, any opposition must be dealt with swiftly and harshly.

Opposition will not be tolerated. So there isn't a model that shows what is going on. According to the climate models we are in a period of time that violates the laws of physics. The contrarians have succeeded in pointing out failures. That's why the strategy must change from "scientists defending the robustness of their results" to "politicians ridiculing."

I've long said that climate science is an adjunct for politics. And vice versa. This is prima facie.

My wife is hotter than your wife.

[lawrocket 3]

jakee

***That's a pretty damn funny accusation coming from the likes of you. Oh, the hypocrisy.

What accusation, bias? He is biased, and the statement becomes no less true if I am as well.

Rush started a thread bemoaning ridicule from one side, and not only has he ignored ridicule from his side in the past, he is making excuses for it right now. If it's hypocrisy you're interested in, have at it.

On all sides. This isn't about science. It's about politics.

My wife is hotter than your wife.

[jakee 1,596]

Quote

Note the need to ridicule the deniers. That's because the climate science community has shot itself in the foot.

I've already demonstrated the need to ridicule the warmists. What's the reason for that?

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[rushmc 23]

jakee

***That's a pretty damn funny accusation coming from the likes of you. Oh, the hypocrisy.

What accusation, bias? He is biased, and the statement becomes no less true if I am as well.

Rush started a thread bemoaning ridicule from one side, and not only has he ignored ridicule from his side in the past, he is making excuses for it right now. If it's hypocrisy you're interested in, have at it.

Actually
I started a thread where a lawmaker stated this
Mr Waxman no less

Got any on the other side stating something like this?

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[jakee 1,596]

Quote

On all sides. This isn't about science. It's about politics.

The thread is about politics. The majority of the politics is about politics. The majority of the science is about science.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[jakee 1,596]

Quote

Actually
I started a thread where...

Actually, you started a thread linking his comments with comments here, and used a sad face to express dismay that some pro AGWers on these forums are being rude. Yet you've only made excuses for a declared strategy of mockery from forum users on your side.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[rushmc 23]

jakee

Quote

Actually
I started a thread where...

Actually, you started a thread linking his comments with comments here, and used a sad face to express dismay that some pro AGWers on these forums are being rude. Yet you've only made excuses for a declared strategy of mockery from forum users on your side.

And they link nicely now dont they

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[winsor 236]

jakee

Quote

On all sides. This isn't about science. It's about politics.

The thread is about politics. The majority of the politics is about politics. The majority of the science is about science.

Except when it's funded by politics.

[turtlespeed 226]

winsor

***

Quote

On all sides. This isn't about science. It's about politics.

The thread is about politics. The majority of the politics is about politics. The majority of the science is about science.

Except when it's funded by politics.

Or corporations the size of small countries. But that falls back as political s by default.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[jakee 1,596]

rushmc

***

Quote

Actually
I started a thread where...

Actually, you started a thread linking his comments with comments here, and used a sad face to express dismay that some pro AGWers on these forums are being rude. Yet you've only made excuses for a declared strategy of mockery from forum users on your side.

And they link nicely now dont they

Do they?

Do you want to have an ideagasm?