popsjumper 2 #26 June 18, 2013 billvon>You tied all your fiction to my one word, "lazy". Me: "The voters who don't have easy proof of citizenship. Native Americans, say. (Which is why the Intertribal Council was the one filing suit.)" You: "Key word "easy". They misspelled 'lazy'." Let's see you weasel out of this one . . . . No weaseling required. Your subsequent comments were still fiction. Now since you brought it back up, you noted the Intertribal council filing suit. Did you note the many different documents acceptable for voter ID in Arizona? Did you note the several that were specific to Native Americans on tribal lands? It's not at all about hard for them. How much easier an it get?My reality and yours are quite different. I think we're all Bozos on this bus. Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
popsjumper 2 #27 June 18, 2013 billvon>Where do you get that? Your own post, when you called the people unable to get voter ID "lazy." Wrong. More fiction. There are no posts from anyone saying Arizona Native Americans are unable to get voter ID. Not even the Inter-tribal council is saying that.My reality and yours are quite different. I think we're all Bozos on this bus. Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Southern_Man 0 #28 June 18, 2013 popsjumper****** What documentation do you think is reasonable to get one more identification paper. If you don't have ANY, then it is hard to get any. Some come here illegally with no U.S.-valid ID and manage to get driver's license and more...apparently fairly easily. Pretty easy to get a birth certificate...no ID needed...just information. From there it's almost a straight shot. Different states are different but in my state you need an ID to get a birth certificate. You need a birth certificate to get an ID. I have no idea about folks who come here illegally, I am simply talking about people who were born and raised here."What if there were no hypothetical questions?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
popsjumper 2 #29 June 18, 2013 *** Point taken, yes. Arizona, apparently not.My reality and yours are quite different. I think we're all Bozos on this bus. Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #30 June 18, 2013 popsjumper***>You tied all your fiction to my one word, "lazy". Me: "The voters who don't have easy proof of citizenship. Native Americans, say. (Which is why the Intertribal Council was the one filing suit.)" You: "Key word "easy". They misspelled 'lazy'." Let's see you weasel out of this one . . . . No weaseling required. Your subsequent comments were still fiction. Now since you brought it back up, you noted the Intertribal council filing suit. Did you note the many different documents acceptable for voter ID in Arizona? Did you note the several that were specific to Native Americans on tribal lands? It's not at all about hard for them. How much easier an it get? In the end, the AZ law was only overturned because of an existing federal law The House is moving to correct this Doubt it will even make it to the Senate"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 906 #31 June 18, 2013 I heard a piece on the radio this morning that some legal geniuses consider this decision entirely based on the use of the federal voter registration forms. They think they have a chance to circumvent this decision by using a state registration form. Something tells me this battle isn't over. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #32 June 18, 2013 normissI heard a piece on the radio this morning that some legal geniuses consider this decision entirely based on the use of the federal voter registration forms. They think they have a chance to circumvent this decision by using a state registration form. Something tells me this battle isn't over. It'll pass, you just need to word it in such a way that the Democrats can continue to disenfranchise citizens indirectly, and soldiers directly. Like Rubio's immigration bill that says you can stay, but you have to have a job (or even if you don't - see the text of the bill for exceptions. At least the list of exceptions is thorough). ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites