0
Andy9o8

YET ANOTHER Republican clueless about rape

Recommended Posts

Quote

Or maybe your (unfounded) claim is false.



Maybe
But looking at it suggests differently
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rushmc


Quote

Or maybe your (unfounded) claim is false.



Maybe
But looking at it suggests differently



but are we looking at it with even a smidgeon of science, or is Sarah doing the thinking here?

Surely you have a citation by now, being over 4 years later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So basically the thread isn't about Rape and what can be done to help women get the help they need or find ways to try and lessen or stop this disgusting act. It's just another thread for one party to throw mud at the other party and thats what we focus on. I say this I am a Republican but I would be willing to work with anyone in order for this issue to get the attention it needs and to move forward. I don't give a crap if they're a Democrat or a member of the Purple Peacock party. Its not about a certain Political Party! Go back and look at each comment and see if its just a lets trash each other and each others political party or if its a discussion about what can be done. Come on we're better then this!!!
OK I'll step of my high horse now.
No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible.
Believe me I tried.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>I say this I am a Republican but I would be willing to work with anyone in order for this
>issue to get the attention it needs and to move forward.

Cool; with more people taking an attitude like that we'd see a significant improvement in the level of discussion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kelpdiver

***

Quote

Or maybe your (unfounded) claim is false.



Maybe
But looking at it suggests differently



but are we looking at it with even a smidgeon of science, or is Sarah doing the thinking here?

Surely you have a citation by now, being over 4 years later.

I am not going back to find what you might be looking for as they were provided years ago
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rushmc

******

Quote

Or maybe your (unfounded) claim is false.



Maybe
But looking at it suggests differently



but are we looking at it with even a smidgeon of science, or is Sarah doing the thinking here?

Surely you have a citation by now, being over 4 years later.

I am not going back to find what you might be looking for as they were provided years ago

Translation - you have nothing.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

*********

Quote

Or maybe your (unfounded) claim is false.



Maybe
But looking at it suggests differently



but are we looking at it with even a smidgeon of science, or is Sarah doing the thinking here?

Surely you have a citation by now, being over 4 years later.

I am not going back to find what you might be looking for as they were provided years ago

Translation - you have nothing.

Good thing you dont rely on translating to make a living
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rushmc

************

Quote

Or maybe your (unfounded) claim is false.



Maybe
But looking at it suggests differently


but are we looking at it with even a smidgeon of science, or is Sarah doing the thinking here?

Surely you have a citation by now, being over 4 years later.

I am not going back to find what you might be looking for as they were provided years ago

Translation - you have nothing.

Good thing you dont rely on translating to make a living

Oh, but I do. And I win awards for it too.:P

If you had something you'd post it. You have nothing.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend


If you had something you'd post it. You have nothing.



It defies any sort of reason. We saw the polling before the VP selection, and the polling and results after.

It was covered pretty well in the HBO documentary - McCain's camp knew they were losing and could either just lose, or take a gamble. She was the gamble. She worked great for the voter base that would never vote for Obama...she may have kept some of them from staying home on election day. But the hope that she would appeal to the moderate undecideds or women fell apart when it was clear how unqualified she was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kelpdiver

But the hope that she would appeal to the moderate undecideds or women fell apart when it was clear how unqualified she was.



You do have to acknowledge that the dems will turn up the media and smearing machinery to full if the reps step off of the dems image of who 'properly' is 'owned' by them. Had the reps put up a very extremely suitable candidate, female or minority, it wouldn't have mattered. You know that too.

It's personal destruction nowadays to even verbalize a desire to run for high office in either party. You have to be a fool to do it - the proof is out there with at least 4 still living that succeeded and dozens of others that got names on ballots .....


'We' (the public) all want good candidates to pick from. But the parties absolutely don't want the other guys to put them up and they'll do anything they can to keep the public from having 2 good choices. Therefore, we don't get 1 good choice either. Default is 0 good choices.

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rehmwa

***But the hope that she would appeal to the moderate undecideds or women fell apart when it was clear how unqualified she was.



You do have to acknowledge that the dems will turn up the media and smearing machinery to full if the reps step off of the dems image of who 'properly' is 'owned' by them. Had the reps put up a very extremely suitable candidate, female or minority, it wouldn't have mattered. You know that too.


Sorry, not buying it. The first coverage I saw of Palin was Tina Fey mocking the Couric interview. I presumed they were having fun at her expense. But when I saw the actual interview, it was clear that Fey wasn't mocking, she was reenacting.

Quote


It's personal destruction nowadays to even verbalize a desire to run for high office in either party. You have to be a fool to do it - the proof is out there with at least 4 still living that succeeded and dozens of others that got names on ballots .....



Huh? Chris Christie hasn't been destroyed. A few fat jokes, but hardly different than the ones he makes himself. It may just be a New York (area) thing, but still looks like a lot of people would like to see him run.

Marco Rubio has been pretty clear in his intent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kelpdiver



A devout Catholic may believe it immoral to have the abortion but eventually come to realization that she would hate this baby. This might take longer than 48 hours or even 48 days.



That is one reason for adoption, isn't it? Isn't there a shortage of babies available for adoption in the US? Or do these women just want to kill the innocent baby to get back at their rapist?

Jan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Huh? Chris Christie hasn't been destroyed. A few fat jokes, but hardly different than the ones he makes himself. It may just be a New York (area) thing, but still looks like a lot of people would like to see him run.



The question is whether Christie can win the nomination in an environment where tea party proponents abhor anything remotely resembling moderation. If the Republicans nominate him, he'll have a damn good chance against any Democrat, and will probably win unless the Dem's follow suit and nominate someone moderate themselves. The extreme polarization of American politics is nearing the end of its useful life. Barring a significant third party candidate, I suspect the winner of the next Presidential election will be the more moderate of the two "real" candidates.

Blues,
Dave
"I AM A PROFESSIONAL EXTREME ATHLETE!"
(drink Mountain Dew)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Society hasn't come far enough to deal with babies that were conceived as a result of a rape. Crud, it hasn't come far enough not to use the topic of rape as a platform to trash a certain political party. It's sad really. We still judge women that conceive and carry outside of wedlock then add to that if the baby was conceived as a result of rape? How dare she consider carrying that baby to term or heaven forbid how dare she be able to separate the baby from the disgusting act and actually care and bond with it. How many people even those close to the woman would not be able to accept that baby. How many partners couldn't handle it themselves. I've seen some supposedly very intelligent people that were unable to separate an innocent baby from a disgusting act. Yeah, we have LONG ways to go.
No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible.
Believe me I tried.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
livendive

Quote


Huh? Chris Christie hasn't been destroyed. A few fat jokes, but hardly different than the ones he makes himself. It may just be a New York (area) thing, but still looks like a lot of people would like to see him run.



The question is whether Christie can win the nomination in an environment where tea party proponents abhor anything remotely resembling moderation. If the Republicans nominate him, he'll have a damn good chance against any Democrat, and will probably win unless the Dem's follow suit and nominate someone moderate themselves. The extreme polarization of American politics is nearing the end of its useful life. Barring a significant third party candidate, I suspect the winner of the next Presidential election will be the more moderate of the two "real" candidates.



Losing is a pretty good motivator to knock that shit off. The GOP was looking for a winner in 2000 (they kicked McCain pretty hard for screwing with a legacy Bush) and I think that will be true in 2016 as well. (unfortunately for Jeb, the Bush name now isn't what it used to be)

The Tea Party was pretty much dead by the aftermath of the 2010 election. Romney already did his big shift to the right, but it can be argued that was as much to fight his Massachusetts history as anything else. The midterm election will be another indication of the TP's remaining influence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
promise5

Crud, it hasn't come far enough not to use the topic of rape as a platform to trash a certain political party. It's sad really.



If senior members of that one party didn't keep putting their collective feet in their mouths on that topic, maybe, just maybe, they wouldn't be getting trashed.

Politicians, especially those of that one party, need to keep their noses out of women's reproductive organs.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry, but like I said earlier it isn't about a political party,its just one more clueless person period!!! Why not focus on the topic of RAPE and how to get these women help instead of the politics. But, then people would have to really care, and when it comes down to it people would rather trash talk politics then find solutions. My point has been proven over and over again in this thread.
No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible.
Believe me I tried.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
promise5

Sorry, but like I said earlier it isn't about a political party,its just one more clueless person period!!! Why not focus on the topic of RAPE and how to get these women help instead of the politics. But, then people would have to really care, and when it comes down to it people would rather trash talk politics then find solutions. My point has been proven over and over again in this thread.



"Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times, it's enemy action.", Auric Goldfinger, in "Goldfinger"

Since we're now up to 5 (or is it 6) ignorant, clueless Republicans in the past year, it would seem to be enemy action in the War against Women.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wow! that's alot out of a political party of how many????
But, again lets not talk about the seriousness of rape and what to do. Instead lets keep talking trash. Yup, that's gonna help!!!!
No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible.
Believe me I tried.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
promise5

Wow! that's alot out of a political party of how many????
!



Remember these were all SENIOR party members - candidates for public office. Rather a large percentage when you think about it that way.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And your focus is on what? A certain political party. How about people giving that same attention to the subject and what can be done. But, then that wouldn't be as interesting. Like I've said I don't care if you're a member of the purple peacock party I'll work with you to get something done!!!!
No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible.
Believe me I tried.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
promise5

Wow! that's alot out of a political party of how many????



that party that has a pro life, anti abortion right plank on its party platform for a few decades now. Hell, Romney had to flop on the issue to become acceptable to them in 2012.

Let's not kid ourselves and say this is a non partisan topic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, I am pro-life. But, since when does rape become about a certain political party? My goodness, again its about the politics instead of about what can be done to help and support women and not only them but their partners.
While, everyone is focused on the politics and trash talk and furthering their own parties, women are going without support and help. Dang,we're talking about real people here!!
Are there people out there that need a better understanding of this issue YES! But, how about helping them with that instead of trash talking and politics.
No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible.
Believe me I tried.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
promise5

And your focus is on what? A certain political party. How about people giving that same attention to the subject and what can be done. But, then that wouldn't be as interesting. Like I've said I don't care if you're a member of the purple peacock party I'll work with you to get something done!!!!



How many senior Democrats or Libertarians have made stupid and ignorant comments about rape? Does the Dem or Libertarian platform contain anti-women language?

THAT is why it's a partisan issue. The Republicans have CHOSEN to make it one.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0