RonD1120 62 #26 May 27, 2013 I did not see either one of you, referring to quade, mention HAARP. He does not accept weather control but, I think he is in the group that believes we can control the temperature of the whole planet.Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RonD1120 62 #27 May 27, 2013 Oh, BTW, Alex Jones is in the entertainment profession. The fact that you pay attention to him proves his success in his field. He is doing his job well.Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #28 May 27, 2013 RonD1120Oh, BTW, Alex Jones is in the entertainment profession. The fact that you pay attention to him proves his success in his field. He is doing his job well. Yep. Just like when, say, Ann Coulter says something outrageously shit-headed, then the next day it's what everyone's talking about. She and her accountant just smile. This is the element for whom there's no such thing as bad publicity. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,595 #29 May 27, 2013 QuoteAre you saying that weather weapons do not exist? Yes. They do not exist. QuoteThere are several patents on different forms of these A patent is not a judgement that something works. QuoteThey have also been banned by the Geneva convention for decades. No they haven't. And the claim suggests that you have no idea what the Geneva Conventions are or what they cover. QuoteWhat makes you say that technology that is decades old and on the record has not been advanced and being used in modern times. Because it's total bullshit.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,595 #30 May 27, 2013 QuoteEverything is possible as far as I am concerned, the onus is on you to explain why it is not. And that claim suggest you have no idea what's involved in the principle of burden of proof, evidence, physics, or reality in general. Maybe you should check out this Storm.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #31 May 27, 2013 Quote Jones implies that it is possible to cause an EF5 tornado to form with current technology. I call bullshit. Show us credible research that suggests that it can be done. DENIER!!! To deny that tornadoes are the result of anthropogenic causes is climate science contrarian denialism to the extreme. GO take your Exxon funded Heartland talking points propaganda elsewhere, you flat earther. Computer models show how it can be done. So knock off the Koch brothers stuff. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RonD1120 62 #32 May 27, 2013 Andy9o8 ***Oh, BTW, Alex Jones is in the entertainment profession. The fact that you pay attention to him proves his success in his field. He is doing his job well. Yep. Just like when, say, Ann Coulter says something outrageously shit-headed, then the next day it's what everyone's talking about. She and her accountant just smile. This is the element for whom there's no such thing as bad publicity. They only thing that bothers me is that I was not able to cash in on the phenomena. I did a Public Access TV show for 18 months in 1988-89 but was not able to use it as a spring board. Ah, so it goes.Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #33 May 27, 2013 ayevee8toryearEverything is possible as far as I am concerned, the onus is on you to explain why it is not. That's not the way it works. You claim it can be done with current technology. It is your responsibility to support such an extraordinary claim with evidence.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #34 May 27, 2013 ayevee8toryearQuoteThe onus is on you to back up the claim that it is possible to create an EF5 tornado at will. A YouTube video does not count as credible research. I do not claim it is definitely possible, I claim it is difficult to determine that it is impossible. The default position is that it cannot be done with current technology. To make a credible claim that it is possible requires supporting evidence. Jones is a tin-foil hatter because he makes such extraordinary claims without any supporting evidence. It's his normal method of operation. His site(s) allow him to cash in on the gullibility of conspiracy theorists.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ayevee8toryear 0 #35 May 27, 2013 QuoteNo they haven't. And the claim suggests that you have no idea what the Geneva Conventions are or what they cover. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_Modification_Convention Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ayevee8toryear 0 #36 May 27, 2013 Actually the default position is that it can be done, a quick Google search will establish that. Who you may palm off as nut jobs may be informed and concerned citizens. I am in the 'I am not so sure' category. Claiming it is impossible or moronic to believe weather modification is possible is the weakest and most pathetic conclusion... It is on the record. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #37 May 27, 2013 ayevee8toryear Actually the default position is that it can be done, a quick Google search will establish that. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bufTna0WArc Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ayevee8toryear 0 #38 May 27, 2013 The default position is the default position, right or wrong. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #39 May 27, 2013 ayevee8toryearActually the default position is that it can be done … No, it isn't. No amount of wishing on your part changes that fact. If it was, other, equally ridiculous ideas would also have to be accepted on faith, such as hitting a golf ball into the sunset from the deck of a yacht as a school of untrained dolphins swims by on the port side results in thunderstorms in Arkansas. Extending your logic, we should automatically believe that golf and dolphins are intrinsically related to Arkansas' precipitation.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ayevee8toryear 0 #40 May 27, 2013 QuoteThat's not the way it works. You claim it can be done with current technology. It is your responsibility to support such an extraordinary claim with evidence. There would not be convention opposed to the use of such technology if it did not exist, go back to your dreamland and conjure up some more rubbish. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ayevee8toryear 0 #41 May 27, 2013 https://www.google.com/search?q=wetaher+warfare&oq=wetaher+warfare&aqs=chrome.0.57j0l3.6117j0&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Can you speak English in common sense? If so, start doing so. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #42 May 27, 2013 ayevee8toryearThere would not be convention opposed to the use of such technology if it did not exist, go back to your dreamland and conjure up some more rubbish. You do realize that laws are often passed preemptively, right?Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,595 #43 May 27, 2013 ayevee8toryearQuoteNo they haven't. And the claim suggests that you have no idea what the Geneva Conventions are or what they cover. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_Modification_Convention It's a convention from Geneva, it's not the Geneva Convention, and it does not demonstrate that Weather warfare was possible in 1977 or today.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ayevee8toryear 0 #44 May 27, 2013 Your knuckles are going white with that bunch of straw you got there. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,595 #45 May 27, 2013 QuoteActually the default position is that it can be done, No it isn't. Quotea quick Google search will establish that. Will establish that people say it can be done but do not present objective evidence. QuoteIt is on the record. No it isn't.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #46 May 27, 2013 ayevee8toryearhttps://www.google.com/search?q=wetaher+warfare&oq=wetaher+warfare&aqs=chrome.0.57j0l3.6117j0&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Can you speak English in common sense? If so, start doing so. Speak English in common sense? Um, what? Did you notice how your linked search doesn't return any credible sources?Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ayevee8toryear 0 #47 May 27, 2013 (how did my reply end up above your post?) My Bad, I guess these people just make up tin foil had Ideas and conjure up such limitations just in case it does happens one day. How stupid and paranoid can people be. LOL Do you suggest the mission in Vietnam was a hoax? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,595 #48 May 27, 2013 ayevee8toryearThe default position is the default position, right or wrong. And you're wrong about what the default position is. QuoteThere would not be convention opposed to the use of such technology if it did not exist Yes, there would.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #49 May 27, 2013 ayevee8toryearYour knuckles are going white with that bunch of straw you got there. I guess we can add straw man fallacy to the list of things you don't understand.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ayevee8toryear 0 #50 May 27, 2013 Grasping at straws is what I was referring to. I thought you might have picked that up, white knuckles and all. What a sad bunch in here. All talk no substance. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
