0
promise5

Opinions on the Jodi Arias trial? Jury questions

Recommended Posts

I've seen interviews on and off on this case. Wondering what others thought are. I found that the jury being able to ask questions very interesting. I believe only 3 states allow this. What do the lawyers on here think of this? Have you ever dealt with it?
No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible.
Believe me I tried.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I tried a case a couple of months ago where the jurors asked two questions. I like the practice. The jury is confused and they can have something answered. They can give some feedback to what they are thinking about. And frankly, as attorneys we often lose sight of those people.

Note - those questions may be objectionable. But I have never seen a juror question that I didn't think was helpful.


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I tried a case a couple of months ago where the jurors asked two questions. I like the practice. The jury is confused and they can have something answered. They can give some feedback to what they are thinking about. And frankly, as attorneys we often lose sight of those people.



Are these questions done verbally, or passed by index card and then opposing counsels and the judge can discuss separately?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I tried a case a couple of months ago where the jurors asked two questions. I like the practice. The jury is confused and they can have something answered. They can give some feedback to what they are thinking about. And frankly, as attorneys we often lose sight of those people.

Note - those questions may be objectionable. But I have never seen a juror question that I didn't think was helpful.



My concern is that the jury/juror might indeed ask a question that is objectionable - lack of relevance, whatever. That being said (and I don't know how it's done in CA), I suppose if the juror submitted the question in writing, and the judge & counsel first privately conferred about whether to answer the question, and if so, how... I suppose that might meet my concerns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
normiss

I'm somewhat surprised they didn't come back with a verdict in 10 minutes or under.



Same here. She's got to be guilty. All the signs are there. :S
"Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[Reply]Are these questions done verbally, or passed by index card and then opposing counsels and the judge can discuss separately?



The the juror passes a question in writing to the bailiff in the jury room. The bailiff gives the question to the judge. The judge tells the attorneys that the jurors have a question and tell us the question. If we find it objectionable we argue it there. If not, then it's up to one of us to either ask it or flesh out the issue. I was still doing the examination, so I asked it.

We never know which juror asked it.


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Andy9o8

******I'm somewhat surprised they didn't come back with a verdict in 10 minutes or under.



Same here. She's got to be guilty. All the signs are there. :S

I think you forgot The Most Important Sign.

:D touche` The media can play a huge part in the public's perception. That's most likely responsible for my view of her.
"Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lawrocket

[Reply]Are these questions done verbally, or passed by index card and then opposing counsels and the judge can discuss separately?



The the juror passes a question in writing to the bailiff in the jury room. The bailiff gives the question to the judge. The judge tells the attorneys that the jurors have a question and tell us the question. If we find it objectionable we argue it there. If not, then it's up to one of us to either ask it or flesh out the issue. I was still doing the examination, so I asked it.

We never know which juror asked it.



Seems reasonable. Yeah, I think I'd be ok w/that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
normiss

Now given the conviction, is the jury allowed questions during penalty phase?
While I don't personally support the DP, I somewhat expect her to receive it.
If it's deserved in any case, this is one of those.



I'm inclined to agree. What she did was premeditated and depraved.

ETA - HOWEVER.... She was said to have preferred to die than serve life in prison. If that's true, then throw her sorry ass in prison for the rest of her life.
"Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here's your two choices guys:

find a crazy, but super hot woman, that'll do anything for you. But watch your back once you break up because she'll stab you if you don't.

or
find a crazy woman. But watch your back once you break up because she'll stab you if you don't.

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Aside from the fact that she says she did it, I suppose it's possible, but I don't know how deep the stab wounds to tr back were. It is physiologically possible to stab yourself on the back, or wedge a knife in place and back into it. It is possible to slit your own throat and shoot yourself in the head before you die. While those actions are theoretically possible, not so much in this case.
witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you fucking kidding me?????

After months of trial the judge lets the jury get away with THAT after a whole HALF DAY of deliberating????

What a slap in the coin purse to Mr. Alexander's family.

Somebody on that jury is a liar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0