Sure, lets add new laws we will not enforce either

[rushmc 23]

Quote

Chicago, Los Angeles, New York Prosecuted Fewest Federal Gun Crimes

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2013/03/28/chicago-los-angeles-new-york-prosecuted-fewest-federal-gun-crimes

Quote

The districts that contain Chicago, Los Angeles and New York City ranked last in terms of federal gun law enforcement in 2012, according to a new report from Syracuse University's Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, which tracks federal data.

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[toolbox 0]

The enemies of the 2nd amendment know they can't stop hard criminals from having guns,or using guns,especially in the big cities like LA or chicago.
They know that they can't stop acts of terror using guns,bombs,cars,ect, with more laws.
Even israel,with it's far stricter laws and more extensive security measures can't stop these acts of violence.
This is not the real reason for the more restrictive laws that they are pushing.
They want to use more restrictive legislation to control citizens from rural states and cities with lower population densities,or from states like texas where the patriotic attitudes and pride in being free are extreme.
I bet the number of violent crimes is far lower in the less populated states since there are less people,but I bet the percentage of gun ownership is higher in these states as well.
The violence is always greatest at the area with the most population density.
If they really want to end violent crime maybe they should outlaw areas with high population densities,and maybe legislate against over population.

[OHCHUTE 0]

Quote

The enemies of the 2nd amendment know they can't stop hard criminals from having guns,or using guns,especially in the big cities like LA or chicago.
They know that they can't stop acts of terror using guns,bombs,cars,ect, with more laws.
Even israel,with it's far stricter laws and more extensive security measures can't stop these acts of violence.
This is not the real reason for the more restrictive laws that they are pushing.
They want to use more restrictive legislation to control citizens from rural states and cities with lower population densities,or from states like texas where the patriotic attitudes and pride in being free are extreme.
I bet the number of violent crimes is far lower in the less populated states since there are less people,but I bet the percentage of gun ownership is higher in these states as well.
The violence is always greatest at the area with the most population density.
If they really want to end violent crime maybe they should outlaw areas with high population densities,and maybe legislate against over population.

So you are talking integration?

[Andy9o8 2]

Quote

So you are talking integration?

No, that category of issue is your obsession, not others'.

[toolbox 0]

>So you are talking integration?

I'm talking creating huge incentives to reduce the population growth if not reverse it instead of taking away individual rights, and encouraging the massive population that will most likely exist in the near future, to be hungry for rescources that have already been consumed.
As the population increases the rescources become less abundant and violence will increase, even between countrymen, as competition for rescources leads to war,and history has shown this scenario to play out over and over.

[Andy9o8 2]

Quote

maybe legislate against over population.

The Chinese have done that for a while now. As a social experiment, the longer-term results are still pending, and we Westerners may be culturally uncomfortable with the concept, but in at least one major country the official policy does exist.

[toolbox 0]

Do gooders have no problem trying to take guns from the hands of regular citizens here in the US,yet the number of people who die from thirst,starvation,disease,and conflict associated with over population dwarfs the deaths from gun violence, and over poulation is getting worse by the day.
So why target guns and ignore the real threat of over population?
Even here in the US we have poverty that is the result of to many humans.
Poverty breeds crime and violence.
So why not campaign for population control instead of rewarding things like teen pregnancy with free housing,medical care,food,daycare,and education,gloryfication by the media of multiple births and huge families ,and leave the law abiding citizens 2nd amendment rights alone?

[rehmwa 2]

Quote

So why not campaign for population control instead of rewarding things like teen pregnancy with free housing,medical care,food,daycare,and education,gloryfication by the media of multiple births and huge families ,and leave the law abiding citizens 2nd amendment rights alone?

because people recognize that population control infringes on everybody's rights

gun control does too, but half the people don't know it - it also allows politicians to create a scary boogieman out of normal citizens so the others can feel self righteous and attack them - this distracts the public so the politicians can go do fun stuff with companies like Solyndra and Monsanto.

mmmm- distractions.....

mmmmm- soylent

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

[toolbox 0]

It's people! Soylent green is people!
Call me what you will,but I liked Heston and his movies.
Heston was a true champion of our rights.
He marched with Martin Luther when it was controversal if not dangerous to do so.
He played a character who had a relationship with a black women in the Omega Man.
He was a good man.
I agree that politicians are the masters of distraction, and deceit.
As far as the over population issue,I'm not saying we should legislate against babies any more than we should legislate against gun ownership by law abiding citizens.
I'm saying that the government should be using all the tools of their propaganda machine to help educate and deter people from over populating.
Hey they could use the same tactics as the anti-gun liberals, except target over population instead.

[Andy9o8 2]

Quote

Heston... marched with Martin Luther ...

wow i knew he wuz old but jeez

[toolbox 0]

Not the father of the lutheran church.
I should have been more specific in who I meant.
Charlton Heston marched with Martin Luther King in support of civil rights for everyone.
Is that better?