0
rushmc

Who’s In Favor of Amending The 2nd Amendment?

Recommended Posts

Quote

I have to agree with the Lefties (sort of). I think it is time we amend the 2nd Amendment. For over 230 years the 2nd Amendment has been in effect protecting its citizens from the hands of those who would seek to deprive us of the Liberty so valiantly obtained. The words within the 2nd Amendment have been strongly debated in recent years. We need to change this aging document to reflect the realities of the 21st century. In the past 4 years our government has engaged in activities to corner the ammunition market with tactics similar to what the Hunt brothers did to silver in the late 1970s, except no one will fine the US government $10,000,000 for their hoarding actions.

The 2nd amendment needs to be amended to include wording to the effect that the United States government cannot corner the ammunition market and artificially inflate the prices on citizens of the United States. No, let’s amp it up and go one step further by including in the 2nd Amendment that the plethora of governmental agencies that have been buying up ammunition like a drunk in a liquor store who just robbed a bank must liquidate all excess ammunition hoards at the end of each fiscal year to the citizens at the price the government paid for it.

Really, what does the Social Security Administration need with 174,000 rounds of 357 Sig, the US Forestry with 300,000+ rounds, the FBI with 100,000,000 rounds, and the Department of Homeland Security with 1,600,000,000 rounds (yes, billion) of ammunition??? Much of these purchase requests include Hollow Point bullets, outlawed by NATO for use in modern warfare, but they can be used within our borders. I’m not willing to jump onto the conspiracy bandwagon, but come on, the US military only burns through about 70,000,000 rounds of ammo a year during a time of war. Since the left is so keen on one’s sanity being grounds for gun ownership, should we really trust guns in the hands of a government who would spend $1,500,000 to study why ¾ of lesbians are fat in the US?




http://minutemennews.com/2013/03/whos-in-favor-of-amending-the-2nd-amendment/
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

:| So your thread is about obesity in lesbians?



Why, does that turn you on?
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I read the article and given that it did not site the source of the fat lesbian statistic, I question the rest of the facts presented.

I mean, really, who brings up lesbian statistics without citing the source? I tried googling 'fat lesbians', but the firewall at work didn't like it.
For the same reason I jump off a perfectly good diving board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
> I tried googling 'fat lesbians', but the firewall at work didn't like it.

I can't imagine what sort of inappropriate material they're trying to block. I mean, why are they trying to block stuff about the second amendment? Must be a bunch of liberals in IT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Quote

I have to agree with the Lefties (sort of). I think it is time we amend the 2nd Amendment. For over 230 years the 2nd Amendment has been in effect protecting its citizens from the hands of those who would seek to deprive us of the Liberty so valiantly obtained. The words within the 2nd Amendment have been strongly debated in recent years. We need to change this aging document to reflect the realities of the 21st century. In the past 4 years our government has engaged in activities to corner the ammunition market with tactics similar to what the Hunt brothers did to silver in the late 1970s, except no one will fine the US government $10,000,000 for their hoarding actions.

The 2nd amendment needs to be amended to include wording to the effect that the United States government cannot corner the ammunition market and artificially inflate the prices on citizens of the United States. No, let’s amp it up and go one step further by including in the 2nd Amendment that the plethora of governmental agencies that have been buying up ammunition like a drunk in a liquor store who just robbed a bank must liquidate all excess ammunition hoards at the end of each fiscal year to the citizens at the price the government paid for it.

Really, what does the Social Security Administration need with 174,000 rounds of 357 Sig, the US Forestry with 300,000+ rounds, the FBI with 100,000,000 rounds, and the Department of Homeland Security with 1,600,000,000 rounds (yes, billion) of ammunition??? Much of these purchase requests include Hollow Point bullets, outlawed by NATO for use in modern warfare, but they can be used within our borders. I’m not willing to jump onto the conspiracy bandwagon, but come on, the US military only burns through about 70,000,000 rounds of ammo a year during a time of war. Since the left is so keen on one’s sanity being grounds for gun ownership, should we really trust guns in the hands of a government who would spend $1,500,000 to study why ¾ of lesbians are fat in the US?




http://minutemennews.com/2013/03/whos-in-favor-of-amending-the-2nd-amendment/



There is something fishy with what is going on with the ammo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


There is something fishy with what is going on with the ammo.



I'm not a tinfoil type either, but it stinks. 1.6 billion rounds? enough for 5 shots into each person in the country. Unless DHS is planning to take over Canada and Mexico, with ammo to spare for Europe...
In every man's life he will be allotted one good woman and one good dog. That's all you get, so appreciate them while the time you have with them lasts.

- RiggerLee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Unless DHS is planning to take over Canada and Mexico, with ammo to spare for Europe...



Not necessary. Just have them all play each other in baseball. Once the earth is thus scorched, we can just move on in.


Didya see the one Canuck who jerseyed the Mexican ballplayer, ala hockey-style? You can take the boy outa Canada, but you can't take Canuckia outa the kid! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Unless DHS is planning to take over Canada and Mexico, with ammo to spare for Europe...



Not necessary. Just have them all play each other in baseball. Once the earth is thus scorched, we can just move on in.


Didya see the one Canuck who jerseyed the Mexican ballplayer, ala hockey-style? You can take the boy outa Canada, but you can't take Canuckia outa the kid! :)


"So youse don't have no teeth, eh? Well, neizer do we, and zis is why!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes

More than the military would need for 10 years at the heighth of the Iraq war and with military illegal ammo to boot
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I read the article and given that it did not site the source of the fat lesbian statistic, I question the rest of the facts presented.

I mean, really, who brings up lesbian statistics without citing the source? I tried googling 'fat lesbians', but the firewall at work didn't like it.



http://cnsnews.com/news/article/feds-spend-15-million-study-why-lesbians-are-fat

Quote


Feds Spend $1.5 Million to Study Why Lesbians Are Fat


"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0