0
rushmc

What Does Obama and John Lott have in common?

Recommended Posts

A bit off topic:

"In a white paper dated January 4 and obtained by NRA-ILA, the deputy director of the National Institute for Justice--DOJ's research and evaluation agency--said that the proposals before Congress are unlikely to have an effect unless they are made even more draconian. For instance, the document makes clear that the effectiveness of "universal" background checks "depends on … requiring gun registration." On the topic of magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition, NIJ writes, "In order to have an impact, large capacity magazine regulation needs to sharply curtail availability to include restrictions on importation, manufacture, sale, and possession." As for popular semi-automatic firearms, the NIJ notes, "Since assault weapons are not a major contributor to U.S. gun homicide and the existing stock of guns is large, an assault weapons ban is unlikely to have an impact on gun violence. If coupled with a gun buyback and no exemptions then it could be effective.""

From: http://www.nraila.org/legislation/federal-legislation/2013/2/obama-justice-department-reveals-truth-about-state-of-the-union-claims.aspx

DOJ paper: http://www.nraila.org/media/10883516/nij-gun-policy-memo.pdf

"Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ."
-NickDG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, not off at all. But they are not wanting to take any guns. That is why they call it a"manditory" buy back
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

No, not off at all. But they are not wanting to take any guns. That is why they call it a"manditory" buy back



Slight thread deviation. I've read about so called "buy back" programs. From what I've read an AR is being bought back for a mere $250 (recent LA buy back). My cheapest AR was $600, after modding it breaks the $1000 range. Why on earth would anyone accept pennies on the dollar on such an item.

For the record, none of my guns have ever caused any violence. The AK's and Saiga's didn't even try to destroy the AR's.
Muff #5048

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

It would be a mandatory buy back



I fail to see the difference between that and confiscation.



Confiscation they just steal the gun.

Mandatory buy back, they tax you first to pay for the program, once they all take their cut, they then take your gun at a huge discount.

Mandatory is better, the government gets more money from you that way. I'm sure they'll then add a processing tax, and maybe a fine also after the fact.

I'm pretty sure on the way out of the confiscation camp, they make you lie naked on the mudd and let a vegetarian stand on your face too. It's good for votes.

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0