0
swisschris62

Dr. Ben Carson, thoughts?......

Recommended Posts

Quote

Ed McMahon was dragging him down.



I think you are confused on which Carson. That was his brother, Kit.
I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet..

But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The man makes a lot of sense. Interested in learning more and seeing more of him.



He is intelligent, articulate, compassionate and demonstrates common sense

And he was right on the money when it came to the toxin that is the ACH
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The man makes a lot of sense. Interested in learning more and seeing more of him.



His work ethic and skill set are impressive. The Seventh Day Adventist part of the picture, however, is disturbing.

Apart from the specific tenets to which they adhere, religious organizations vary greatly in their power structure, and the more recently founded organizations are all the more transparent. The Eastern Orthodox Church, for example, defies simple analysis because it defines "Byzantine," and the Roman version is no better. OTOH, Scientology and LDS are very easily scrutinized, and their analyses are identical - like an onion, when you get done peeling back the layers of nonsense, there is nothing left.

The Seventh Day Adventist Church is similar in that its founding followed the demonstration that its fundamental claims were baseless. Like the world coming to an end last year (thank goodness it restarted instantly...), the reappearance of the Messiah on a particular date at a given location did not work out as planned, and the Church consists of those who were unfazed by the big "nevermind."

I am much more comfortable with the viewpoint of a skeptic than that of an adherent of any particular ism, and this includes scientific orthodoxy. When someone comes up with evidence that dispels the Phlogiston or Caloric Theories, I'm with those whose response is "fascinating!," rather than those that respond by chasing their tails, frothing at the mouth and screaming "No! This cannot be!" when their cherished belief system is revealed to be terminally flawed.

I do not "believe in" Evolution. It is an effective model that stands up to scrutiny and is thus a useful analytic tool with well known predictive limitations. I hold suspect people such as Dr. Carson who "disbelieve in" evolution; that is an intellectual line that will serve to divide us.

Would I have Dr. Carson operate on my kid if his talents were needed and available? Sure.

Do I blindly accept Dr. Carson's take on "E) All the above?" Not hardly.

Then again, I do not take the work of our Patron Saint of Genius, Albert Einstein, as sacrosanct (nor did he), and am thus not hobbled by the Orthodoxy of Relativity. Albert was not being artificially humble when he rated James Clerk Maxwell as the paradigm of brilliance.

In any event, I find Dr. Carson's comments at the National Prayer Breakfast refreshing. I think he addressed symptoms, rather than the underlying syndrome, but it's a start.


BSBD,

Winsor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In any event, I find Dr. Carson's comments at the National Prayer Breakfast refreshing. I think he addressed symptoms, rather than the underlying syndrome, but it's a start.


BSBD,

Winsor



I find this interesting


Can you expand?
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


In any event, I find Dr. Carson's comments at the National Prayer Breakfast refreshing. I think he addressed symptoms, rather than the underlying syndrome, but it's a start.


BSBD,

Winsor



I find this interesting

Can you expand?



Sure, but it is difficult to do so in the short form of this forum.

One example is his treatment of health care costs, where he focuses on the mechanism whereby people pay their medical bills. He entirely overlooks the problem of WHY the medical bills are so high.

Over 90% of medical costs are overhead. Presented with a bill that includes $10,000 a day for a hospital bed, the key issue is not how to come up with that kind of money but, rather, how it is possible to reduce the overhead to the extent that the costs are only 10x as high as a four-star hotel, not 100x; 1,000 a day for a room alone is still obscenely expensive.

The last two go-arounds of "Health Care Reform," one of which saw changes ramrodded into place, were the result of lawyers trying to fix the medical system. Lawyers trying to fix the problem of Doctors charging too much money? What is wrong with this picture?

To the question of whether the problem is the medical system, the political system or the recipients of medical care, the answer is an unequivocal "YES."

It is hard to say whether our political system, legal system or health care system is the more badly broken. They are all in particularly bad shape.

Why is this? Because of us. As Jello Biafra said, "give me convenience or give me death!"

We want an affordable health care system where we can get the latest and greatest treatments at our convenience. Any errors made by medical practitioners are unacceptable; since M.D. stands for "Minor Deity," human error is out of the question. Even if we are in the process of dying (aren't we all?) when we show up, we have the absolute right to compensation if we are not satisfied with the outcome.

I can, and tend to, go on, but I am suspicious of simplistic treatments from anyone with a vested interest in an issue. This is not necessarily due to conflict of interest, but also comes from being too close to see the big picture. Can't see the forest for the trees and all that.


BSBD,

Winsor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


In any event, I find Dr. Carson's comments at the National Prayer Breakfast refreshing. I think he addressed symptoms, rather than the underlying syndrome, but it's a start.


BSBD,

Winsor



I find this interesting

Can you expand?



Sure, but it is difficult to do so in the short form of this forum.

One example is his treatment of health care costs, where he focuses on the mechanism whereby people pay their medical bills. He entirely overlooks the problem of WHY the medical bills are so high.

Over 90% of medical costs are overhead. Presented with a bill that includes $10,000 a day for a hospital bed, the key issue is not how to come up with that kind of money but, rather, how it is possible to reduce the overhead to the extent that the costs are only 10x as high as a four-star hotel, not 100x; 1,000 a day for a room alone is still obscenely expensive.

The last two go-arounds of "Health Care Reform," one of which saw changes ramrodded into place, were the result of lawyers trying to fix the medical system. Lawyers trying to fix the problem of Doctors charging too much money? What is wrong with this picture?

To the question of whether the problem is the medical system, the political system or the recipients of medical care, the answer is an unequivocal "YES."

It is hard to say whether our political system, legal system or health care system is the more badly broken. They are all in particularly bad shape.

Why is this? Because of us. As Jello Biafra said, "give me convenience or give me death!"

We want an affordable health care system where we can get the latest and greatest treatments at our convenience. Any errors made by medical practitioners are unacceptable; since M.D. stands for "Minor Deity," human error is out of the question. Even if we are in the process of dying (aren't we all?) when we show up, we have the absolute right to compensation if we are not satisfied with the outcome.

I can, and tend to, go on, but I am suspicious of simplistic treatments from anyone with a vested interest in an issue. This is not necessarily due to conflict of interest, but also comes from being too close to see the big picture. Can't see the forest for the trees and all that.


BSBD,

Winsor



Thanks for taking the time


Good post
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


In any event, I find Dr. Carson's comments at the National Prayer Breakfast refreshing. I think he addressed symptoms, rather than the underlying syndrome, but it's a start.


BSBD,

Winsor



I find this interesting


Can you expand?



I stumbled across this. It does a pretty good job of explaining why the issue is no so much working out how the bills are paid as it is why the bills are so insanely high in the first place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0