rushmc 23
QuoteQuoteJust to show how easily people will believe crap if they WANT to believe it.
!
Is this now a pro-AGW thread?
Wow
it sure changed fast
Are you trying to exemplify post #13?
I would have to work very hard to get to that point as easily as the the one that posted it does
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
jgoose71 0
Quote
It's bogus but still spreading virally over the right wing blogosphere.
What a bunch of MORONS.
So for the record, are you now changing your stance on laws saying that if we take away guns from the good guys, gun crime will go down?
Life, the Universe, and Everything
kallend 2,148
QuoteQuote
It's bogus but still spreading virally over the right wing blogosphere.
What a bunch of MORONS.
So for the record, are you now changing your stance on laws saying that if we take away guns from the good guys, gun crime will go down?
Link please?
My stance is that people who post crap without first checking to see if it is crap are stupid.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
davjohns 1
QuoteI would have to work very hard to get to that point as easily as the the one that posted it does
I disagree with the Senator's socio-political views. I do not suppose she is completely stupid. So, I was not surprised to find that she did not go that extreme in public. I am not surprised that people with a legitimate fear for their rights were pushed by an untrue article to share their fears.
Kallend declares anyone who disagrees with him a 'moron'. I do not.
But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
rushmc 23
I would change that to "extreme liberals" declare anyone who disagrees with them a moron
kallend is just among them
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
davjohns 1
I would suggest, however, that 'extremes' in any direction commend themselves to reduced logic and more emotion.
But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
Stumpy 284
QuoteI find that flaw of logic quite prolific. I can not attribute it to one end of the spectrum more than the other.
I would suggest, however, that 'extremes' in any direction commend themselves to reduced logic and more emotion.
Bingo
rushmc 23
QuoteI find that flaw of logic quite prolific. I can not attribute it to one end of the spectrum more than the other.
I would suggest, however, that 'extremes' in any direction commend themselves to reduced logic and more emotion.
I guess I see it more as a matter of emotion
I also see one side using emotion more than thinking or logic
I dont see you calling others names or using under the table insults
I have, but usually in responce to one (example of kallends PA)
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
davjohns 1
I see plenty of conservatives (with whom I often sympathize) who will declare their opponents bereft of intellect. They are equally wrong for doing so.
But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
rushmc 23
Agreed
I just see one side doing it more than the other
(by a large margin)
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
Is this now a pro-AGW thread?
Wow
it sure changed fast
Are you trying to exemplify post #13?
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.