kallend 2,182 #26 December 28, 2012 Quoteperhaps instead of playing ring around the rosie you could answer his question in the matter that he asked you...without subterfuge. Invalid question.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #27 December 28, 2012 QuoteQuoteperhaps instead of playing ring around the rosie you could answer his question in the matter that he asked you...without subterfuge. Invalid question. I'll bet y'all didn't know that John could sing did ya?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #28 December 28, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteperhaps instead of playing ring around the rosie you could answer his question in the matter that he asked you...without subterfuge. Invalid question. I'll bet y'all didn't know that John could sing did ya? If you frame the question in an intelligent manner, perhaps it could be answered. As it stands, it's a nonsense question.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #29 December 28, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteperhaps instead of playing ring around the rosie you could answer his question in the matter that he asked you...without subterfuge. Invalid question. I'll bet y'all didn't know that John could sing did ya? If you frame the question in an intelligent manner, perhaps it could be answered. As it stands, it's a nonsense question. Why is it that you seem to be the only one that doesn't understand the question?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #30 December 28, 2012 Quote ...A gun in the home is more likely to be used to kill a family member or friend, or be stolen and get into criminal hands, than to be used to stop an intruder... You've made this claim several times in recent days. Professor. Can you back it up? I know of the "43 time more likely to kill a friend or family member than to kill an intruder." That is an old claim first put out by the "Brady Bunch" that is flawed because: A - It includes anyone aquainted with anyone (including gang memebers) as "friends" and includes estranged spouses as "family." B - Intruders are killed in a very small percentage of defensive gun uses. Less than one percent of confrontations end with the intruder dead. So where does your claim come from?"There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #31 December 29, 2012 QuoteQuote ...A gun in the home is more likely to be used to kill a family member or friend, or be stolen and get into criminal hands, than to be used to stop an intruder... You've made this claim several times in recent days. Professor. Can you back it up? I know of the "43 time more likely to kill a friend or family member than to kill an intruder." That is an old claim first put out by the "Brady Bunch" that is flawed because: A - It includes anyone aquainted with anyone (including gang memebers) as "friends" and includes estranged spouses as "family." B - Intruders are killed in a very small percentage of defensive gun uses. Less than one percent of confrontations end with the intruder dead. So where does your claim come from? Department of Justice.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #32 December 29, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote perhaps instead of playing ring around the rosie you could answer his question in the matter that he asked you...without subterfuge. Invalid question. I'll bet y'all didn't know that John could sing did ya? If you frame the question in an intelligent manner, perhaps it could be answered. As it stands, it's a nonsense question. Why is it that you seem to be the only one that doesn't understand the question? Dunning Kruger effect maybe. Those who *think* they understand it are just unaware of their lack of basic skills.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #33 December 29, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuote ...A gun in the home is more likely to be used to kill a family member or friend, or be stolen and get into criminal hands, than to be used to stop an intruder... You've made this claim several times in recent days. Professor. Can you back it up? I know of the "43 time more likely to kill a friend or family member than to kill an intruder." That is an old claim first put out by the "Brady Bunch" that is flawed because: A - It includes anyone aquainted with anyone (including gang memebers) as "friends" and includes estranged spouses as "family." B - Intruders are killed in a very small percentage of defensive gun uses. Less than one percent of confrontations end with the intruder dead. So where does your claim come from? Department of Justice. I want a link for that one pal"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
regulator 0 #34 December 29, 2012 plan on waiting a while. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgoose71 0 #35 December 29, 2012 Silly, the difference between a valid and invalid question is the ability to throw a liberal talking point at it..... Direct questions to real world scenarios are invalid.... "There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." Life, the Universe, and Everything Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #36 December 29, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote ...A gun in the home is more likely to be used to kill a family member or friend, or be stolen and get into criminal hands, than to be used to stop an intruder... You've made this claim several times in recent days. Professor. Can you back it up? I know of the "43 time more likely to kill a friend or family member than to kill an intruder." That is an old claim first put out by the "Brady Bunch" that is flawed because: A - It includes anyone aquainted with anyone (including gang memebers) as "friends" and includes estranged spouses as "family." B - Intruders are killed in a very small percentage of defensive gun uses. Less than one percent of confrontations end with the intruder dead. So where does your claim come from? Department of Justice. I want a link for that one pal Been given multiple times before.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
