Should Eric Holder stay as Attorney General?

[CarpeDiem3 0]

"Holder noncommittal on staying as Obama's attorney general"

Quote: "Attorney General Eric Holder said on Thursday that he has yet to determine whether he will stay on as the chief U.S. law enforcement officer for President Barack Obama's second term..."

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/08/us-usa-campaign-holder-idUSBRE8A715H20121108

Should Holder STAY, or should he GO?

[kelpdiver 2]

the question should have been - should Holder be sent out the door?

[Southern_Man 0]

If he goes there will be trouble, if he stays it will be double.

"What if there were no hypothetical questions?"

[billvon 3,120]

This indecision is bugging me.

[CarpeDiem3 0]

Stunning poll results, in a forum where partisanship is usually somewhat evenly split. It would seem that even many of the democrats are tired of Holder's antics. It's refreshing to see that they don't just blindly support him because he's Broncobama's man, and that they'll actually want him out because of his scandals.

[Gravitymaster 0]

Quote

Stunning poll results, in a forum where partisanship is usually somewhat evenly split. It would seem that even many of the democrats are tired of Holder's antics. It's refreshing to see that they don't just blindly support him because he's Broncobama's man, and that they'll actually want him out because of his scandals.

Some really like being lied to. They think it's cool when the government lies to them.

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Quote

Some really like being lied to. They think it's cool when the government lies to them.

And some really like to believe whatever they are told, as long as it is their side of the aisle doing the talking.

[Gravitymaster 0]

Quote

Quote

Some really like being lied to. They think it's cool when the government lies to them.

And some really like to believe whatever they are told, as long as it is their side of the aisle doing the talking.

As evidenced by the number of people in this poll who believe Holder should stay.

[SkyDekker 1,465]

And some of the "facts" posted here by others leading up to the election.

[Gravitymaster 0]

Quote

And some of the "facts" posted here by others leading up to the election.

You mean like the bullshit such as the war on women? That Republicans hate blacks andd hispanics? How about that Republicans want to put blacks "back in chains"? You mean that kind of bullshit?

[billvon 3,120]

>As evidenced by the number of people in this poll who believe Holder should stay.

Coming from the party of "we'll re-skew the polls to give our guy the lead" that's pretty funny. When most republicans prefer FOX News over actual numbers, you know you're getting pretty far away from the reality-based community.

[billvon 3,120]

>You mean like the bullshit such as the war on women?

How'd that go for you in the last election?

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Quote

You mean like the bullshit such as the war on women?

The remarks made regarding women, rape and abortion probably did not help this stereo type.

Quote

That Republicans hate blacks andd hispanics?

Well, you keep telling them that they only vote for Obama cause he is black. Basically telling them they do not have the capacity to think beyond that.

War and hate are strong words and I generally don't garee on how they are used. However, it is pretty clear to me that the Republican party did very little in reaching out to women, blacks, or hispanics during this election.

It isa party which has historically relied on the old white boys to keep them in power. They are trying to change, but it is going to take quite some time, and some muzzles, before they can shake their "image".

[Gravitymaster 0]

Quote

>You mean like the bullshit such as the war on women?

How'd that go for you in the last election?

I hope you and Kallend realize how many people are laughing at your pathetic efforts to blame everything you disagree with Republicans on as a reason they lost the election. Seriously...

[Gravitymaster 0]

Quote

Quote

You mean like the bullshit such as the war on women?

The remarks made regarding women, rape and abortion probably did not help this stereo type.

Quote

That Republicans hate blacks andd hispanics?

Well, you keep telling them that they only vote for Obama cause he is black. Basically telling them they do not have the capacity to think beyond that.

War and hate are strong words and I generally don't garee on how they are used. However, it is pretty clear to me that the Republican party did very little in reaching out to women, blacks, or hispanics during this election.

It isa party which has historically relied on the old white boys to keep them in power. They are trying to change, but it is going to take quite some time, and some muzzles, before they can shake their "image".

Do you ever get dizzy from being spun so much?

[billvon 3,120]

>I hope you and Kallend realize how many people are laughing at your pathetic efforts >to blame everything you disagree with Republicans on as a reason they lost the
>election.

OK, it had nothing to do with it. So try it again during the next election. Maybe claim that rape doesn't exist, or that no abortions are ever done for health reasons. Let us know how it goes.

[Gravitymaster 0]

Quote

>I hope you and Kallend realize how many people are laughing at your pathetic efforts >to blame everything you disagree with Republicans on as a reason they lost the
>election.

OK, it had nothing to do with it. So try it again during the next election. Maybe claim that rape doesn't exist, or that no abortions are ever done for health reasons. Let us know how it goes.

Even you cannot believe that the press and the DNC didn't take the words of one politician and spin it into a mountain.

BTW, how's that Stock Market and the Unemployment rate going since your hero got elected? That's what people will ultimately care about.

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Quote

Do you ever get dizzy from being spun so much?

Very well thought out response. With such intellectual insight, the Republican Party should have no more problems with any future elections.

[billvon 3,120]

>Even you cannot believe that the press and the DNC didn't take the words of one
>politician and spin it into a mountain.

Like the man said, once is happenstance. twice is coincidence. three times is enemy action.

[kallend 2,151]

Quote

Quote

>You mean like the bullshit such as the war on women?

How'd that go for you in the last election?

I hope you and Kallend realize how many people are laughing at your pathetic efforts to blame everything you disagree with Republicans on as a reason they lost the election. Seriously...

And how did your beliefs work out for the GOP?

But keep it up. As long as you and your party remain in denial, you'll keep on losing. And losing. And losing.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[Gravitymaster 0]

Quote

Quote

Do you ever get dizzy from being spun so much?

Very well thought out response. With such intellectual insight, the Republican Party should have no more problems with any future elections.

I think the depth of the answer was commenserate with the post I was responding to.

[Gravitymaster 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

>You mean like the bullshit such as the war on women?

How'd that go for you in the last election?

I hope you and Kallend realize how many people are laughing at your pathetic efforts to blame everything you disagree with Republicans on as a reason they lost the election. Seriously...

And how did your beliefs work out for the GOP?

But keep it up. As long as you and your party remain in denial, you'll keep on losing. And losing. And losing.

Which beliefs would those be?

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Quote

I think

Based on your history of cutting and pasting emails to posts without any research or fact checking, we already know that thinking isn't one of you strong suits.

Hence, expecting a response with a modicum of though from you is a mistake I won't be making again.

[billvon 3,120]

Your one warning. No PA's.

[Gravitymaster 0]

Quote

Quote

I think

Based on your history of cutting and pasting emails to posts without any research or fact checking, we already know that thinking isn't one of you strong suits.

Hence, expecting a response with a modicum of though from you is a mistake I won't be making again.

Nice personal attack. If I had said what you just said, I would be banned for 2 weeks.

Please cite several examples in the 12 years I have been posting here where I have pasted an email with incorrect information?

Should be fairly simple if what you claim is true. But you won't because you have a history of making stupid statements and then are later shown to have foot in mouth disease.