rushmc 23 #1351 March 3, 2015 SkyDekker Quote How about all of these people feeding lies to the people. It is like you repeating what you read on newsmax or fox because you honestly believe they couldn't be wrong. BOOOOOM Did I find any of this on newsmax or fox? You just got shit whipped and this is what you come back with???? Priceless"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #1352 March 3, 2015 rushmcHow about this one BTW most of these sites are not easy to find on Google If you are looking for stuff like this find other search engines as google can no longer be trusted IMO http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/arnold-ahlert/saddams-wmds-the-lefts-iraq-lies-exposed/ Google can't be trusted, we should turn to beacons of knowledge like frontpagemag.com. Thank you for ending any option of a normal debate early! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #1353 March 3, 2015 SkyDekker***How about this one BTW most of these sites are not easy to find on Google If you are looking for stuff like this find other search engines as google can no longer be trusted IMO http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/arnold-ahlert/saddams-wmds-the-lefts-iraq-lies-exposed/ Google can't be trusted, we should turn to beacons of knowledge like frontpagemag.com. Thank you for ending any option of a normal debate early! You did that as soon as you said Bush lied Please, continued being used It is entertaining"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #1354 March 3, 2015 Then I guess you believe that your intelligence agency were completely incompetenent. Or, you believe that google is compromised, and that frontpagemag.com has it all right. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #1355 March 3, 2015 SkyDekker Then I guess you believe that your intelligence agency were completely incompetenent. Or, you believe that google is compromised, and that frontpagemag.com has it all right. Funny you pick just one Again Dont hurt yourselfAnd do a search using the exact same querry on two different search engines See the differences for yourself BTW Who lied to all those Democrates regarding WMD BEFORE Bush was running and while Clinton was President? Please, enlighten us all"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #1356 March 3, 2015 QuoteBTW Who lied to all those Democrates regarding WMD BEFORE Bush was running and while Clinton was President? Lol Your question nicely points out how you are just following what some blog is feeding you. You may want to figure out what happened in all those years in Iraq. But then, you can't google it, cause they cant be trusted. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #1357 March 3, 2015 SkyDekkerQuoteBTW Who lied to all those Democrates regarding WMD BEFORE Bush was running and while Clinton was President? Lol Your question nicely points out how you are just following what some blog is feeding you. You may want to figure out what happened in all those years in Iraq. But then, you can't google it, cause they cant be trusted. Answer the question Who was feeding the lies to all those Dems BEFORE Bush was even running for the President? What about the law President Clinton signed? Or was he conspiring behind the seens to set this war up before he was even running????? I guess the only one running now is you Dont get too tired"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #1358 March 3, 2015 rushmc***QuoteBTW Who lied to all those Democrates regarding WMD BEFORE Bush was running and while Clinton was President? Lol Your question nicely points out how you are just following what some blog is feeding you. You may want to figure out what happened in all those years in Iraq. But then, you can't google it, cause they cant be trusted. Answer the question Who was feeding the lies to all those Dems BEFORE Bush was even running for the President? What about the law President Clinton signed? Or was he conspiring behind the seens to set this war up before he was even running????? I guess the only one running now is you Dont get too tired Irrelevant. Clinton didn't go to war to overthrow Saddam. Bush did. Democrats mostly supported Bush actions and were hawkish in their statements. But bringing Clinton in is like asking why Reagan followed Carter's policies of containment of the USSR My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #1359 March 3, 2015 lawrocket******QuoteBTW Who lied to all those Democrates regarding WMD BEFORE Bush was running and while Clinton was President? Lol Your question nicely points out how you are just following what some blog is feeding you. You may want to figure out what happened in all those years in Iraq. But then, you can't google it, cause they cant be trusted. Answer the question Who was feeding the lies to all those Dems BEFORE Bush was even running for the President? What about the law President Clinton signed? Or was he conspiring behind the seens to set this war up before he was even running????? I guess the only one running now is you Dont get too tired Irrelevant. Clinton didn't go to war to overthrow Saddam. Bush did. Democrats mostly supported Bush actions and were hawkish in their statements. But bringing Clinton in is like asking why Reagan followed Carter's policies of containment of the USSR Not irrelevant The same narrative was being pushed for years It was an imbedded belief that Washington had The vote to go to war had very few against it It shows the mindset and the belief about what SH was and what he had for weapons Add this the fact that he was known to have used WMDs against his own people No, not irrelevant"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #1360 March 3, 2015 rushmc*********QuoteBTW Who lied to all those Democrates regarding WMD BEFORE Bush was running and while Clinton was President? Lol Your question nicely points out how you are just following what some blog is feeding you. You may want to figure out what happened in all those years in Iraq. But then, you can't google it, cause they cant be trusted. Answer the question Who was feeding the lies to all those Dems BEFORE Bush was even running for the President? What about the law President Clinton signed? Or was he conspiring behind the seens to set this war up before he was even running????? I guess the only one running now is you Dont get too tired Irrelevant. Clinton didn't go to war to overthrow Saddam. Bush did. Democrats mostly supported Bush actions and were hawkish in their statements. But bringing Clinton in is like asking why Reagan followed Carter's policies of containment of the USSR Not irrelevant The same narrative was being pushed for years It was an imbedded belief that Washington had The vote to go to war had very few against it It shows the mindset and the belief about what SH was and what he had for weapons Add this the fact that he was known to have used WMDs against his own people No, not irrelevant Correct. But Clinton didn't commit troops to war. Period. Bush is the one who made the move and used shoddy Intel and a terrorist theme to get popular support. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,588 #1361 March 3, 2015 By the time we went to war with Iraq, there was more information as well. The UN inspectors had been there for awhile, and were coming to the conclusion that the possible WMDs were an illusion and an exaggeration. People should actually review additional information as it comes in, not only if it agrees with the narrative. Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cvfd1399 0 #1362 March 3, 2015 QuotePeople should actually review additional information as it comes in, not only if it agrees with the narrative. Was this before or after congress approved the resolution? And if after was there nothing they could to do reverse it? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airdvr 210 #1363 March 3, 2015 Keep flogging that dead horse. We all have our ideas and none of it can be proven. Now...what idiots wouldn't consider an attack on an embassy on September 11th of ANY year to not be at least a possible terror attack. You want us to believe that HillBarryRice missed that? Maybe. 2 months before a Presidential election? A little less maybe. Combined with a doctored unemployment report. A lot less maybe. The people of the United States were played like a piano just like we've been played many other times. Again...there is no definitive proof.Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #1364 March 3, 2015 Of course. There are many reasons why I didn't support the war. This is one of them My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RonD1120 62 #1365 March 15, 2015 If nothing else it makes the weasel squirm. In the Clinton world of politics this subversive behavior is business as usual. I just hope and pray that the American voter has become aware enough to remove her from politics forever. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/mar/14/clinton-email-benghazi-gop-lawmakerLook for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RonD1120 62 #1366 May 12, 2015 Former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell poses some interesting questions. http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/05/the-real-benghazi-cia-insiders-account-117828.html#.VVIpAPlVikoLook for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #1367 May 12, 2015 RonD1120 Former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell poses some interesting questions. http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/05/the-real-benghazi-cia-insiders-account-117828.html#.VVIpAPlViko Let us know when they come up with some interesting answers.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RonD1120 62 #1368 May 13, 2015 Morell stated on the news tonight that Petraeus and the CIA knew by the morning of 13 Sep 2012 that the video had no direct involvement. Yet Susan Rice, Hillary Clinton and BHO were still holding to the cover story then and many days afterward. He said he will testify for Trey Gowdy's investigative committee.Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #1369 May 13, 2015 RonD1120Morell stated on the news tonight that Petraeus and the CIA knew by the morning of 13 Sep 2012 that the video had no direct involvement. Yet Susan Rice, Hillary Clinton and BHO were still holding to the cover story then and many days afterward. He said he will testify for Trey Gowdy's investigative committee. Petraeus - plea bargained his way out of a felony conviction. Not an ideal source, I'd say.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RonD1120 62 #1370 May 13, 2015 You are comparing apples to oranges.Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #1371 May 13, 2015 RonD1120 You are comparing apples to oranges. What difference, at this point, does it really make anyway!!!??I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #1372 May 13, 2015 RonD1120You are comparing apples to oranges. More like Apples to Androids. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #1373 May 18, 2015 Oh well At this point, what does it matter?Oh, I guess this has been said already..... Quote Judicial Watch has obtained previously classified documents from the U.S. Department of Defense and the Department of State revealing that DOD almost immediately reported that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, was planned and carried out by al-Qaida and Muslim Brotherhood-linked terrorists. A federal court ordered the government hand over more than 100 pages of previously secret documents that showed then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other senior Obama officials were given reports within hours of the Sept. 11, 2012, attack. In those memos, the DOD described details of a plan 10 days in advance “to kill as many Americans as possible.” "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,116 #1374 May 18, 2015 >In those memos, the DOD described details of a plan 10 days in advance “to kill as >many Americans as possible.” Unfortunate that the memo wasn't titled "Bin Laden Determined To Strike In US." Because if it was, it would be A-OK to ignore completely. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #1375 May 18, 2015 billvon>In those memos, the DOD described details of a plan 10 days in advance “to kill as >many Americans as possible.” Unfortunate that the memo wasn't titled "Bin Laden Determined To Strike In US." Because if it was, it would be A-OK to ignore completely.Really?? You got it all figured out. Good for you"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites