0
jclalor

Horses and Bayonets

Recommended Posts

Two weeks ago Romney says the President is wrong for setting an exit date for Afghanistan, tonight he says 2014 is when we should exit. Two months ago he claims that Russia is the greatest threat to the US, did he even mention Russia tonight?

On the other hand, Romney did agree with most of Obama's foreign policy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

When is 2014 a date? 10/10/14 is a date. He didn't want to put a precise date and tip our hand to the enemy, who is in the mts, or out of country waiting on us



Romney had previously said he would not give any date, He said he would leave it up to the military. Perhaps you mean he wouldn't provide a precise year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


But Romney won the "pants on fire" lie contest. He told two whoppers, to Obama's zero (Politifact.com)



Romneys also going to win the Presidential contest.

You and the other radical socialists going to be difficult to live with for a few weeks after the election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So, I read the Politifact page and I think this is a better evaluation of the statements made in the debate. It's worth noting, though, that the politifact pages aren't in response to tonight's debate, they just gathered up pages they had put together previously.

Quote

ROMNEY: "Mr. President, the reason I call it an apology tour is because you went to the Middle East and you flew to Egypt and to Saudi Arabia and to Turkey and Iraq. And by the way, you skipped Israel, our closest friend in the region, but you went to the other nations. And by the way, they noticed that you skipped Israel. And then in those nations, and on Arabic TV, you said that America had been dismissive and derisive. You said that on occasion America had dictated to other nations."

OBAMA: "Nothing Gov. Romney just said is true, starting with this notion of me apologizing. This has been probably the biggest whopper that's been told during the course of this campaign. And every fact checker and every reporter who's looked at it, governor, has said this is not true."

THE FACTS: Romney has indeed repeatedly and wrongly accused the president of traveling the world early in his presidency and apologizing for U.S. behavior. Obama didn't say "sorry" in those travels. But in this debate, Romney at last explained the context of his accusation: not that Obama apologized literally, but that he had been too deferential in his visits to Europe, Latin America and the Muslim world.

Obama said while abroad that the U.S. acted "contrary to our traditions and ideals" in its treatment of terrorist suspects, that "America has too often been selective in its promotion of democracy," that the U.S. "certainly shares blame" for international economic turmoil and has sometimes "shown arrogance and been dismissive, even divisive" toward Europe. Yet he also praised America and its ideals.



And in reading politifact's evaluation of the Navy and Air Force sizes, I guess I just can't agree with their rating system. Romney wasn't lying, he was just pointing out a trend that doesn't really mean anything. The president was right in rebutting with jokes that ship and aircraft counts aren't everything anymore, and he was also right in not saying Romney's statement was incorrect.

Also when they do things like this it doesn't help their argument...

Quote

We looked up the original data, and the Heritage report does reflect the trend line correctly (though Romney said 1917 rather than 1916, something we won’t quibble with). In 1916, the U.S. Navy had 245 active ships, a number that eventually peaked during World War II, then fell, then peaked again more modestly during the Korean War, followed by a slow, consistent decline over the next five decades.

In recent years, the number of active ships has fallen low enough to approach its 1916 level. In both 2009 (the most recent year of the Heritage report) and 2011, the number was 285.



Why are they clearly stating that Romney said 1917 but then chewing him out for being wrong as though he had said 1916, and then saying they'll let it slide because he pegs out the lie meter anyway on account of it not being a good measure in the first place?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I did not like the debate and dozed off from 2210-2220.

Romney appeared more presidential and diplomatic.

Bottom line BHO is a socialist and Romney is a capitalist. That is the issue to ponder.
Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed.
;)

Romney said what he said and it was kind of dumb. I'm not defending it in any way. Obama said what he said, came across as a dick and may be factually wrong. IMO anyway.

Just another inconsequential distraction over semantics.
I didn't see any gain for either side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I didn't see any gain for either side.

I don't know about any net gain either, given that all but about 6% have already decided who the are going to support.

What struck me was that once again the Romney that showed up was quite different from the belligerent saber rattling campaign trail Romney. I really don't know what the guy stands for, what he believes (or hopes for), or how he would behave in office. "Any way the wind blows doesn't really matter, to meeee.."(/Queen).

Don
_____________________________________
Tolerance is the cost we must pay for our adventure in liberty. (Dworkin, 1996)
“Education is not filling a bucket, but lighting a fire.” (Yeats)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

And you really have a clue what Obama stands by?

.



Yes, he wants YOU to pay more tax.

Romney, OTOH, just wants to take away your deductions, or not. He wants military interventions, but doesn't. He supports legislation to outlaw abortions, but doesn't. He says the president can create 12 million jobs but says the government can't create jobs. He is going to repeal the ACA because it's too expensive but keep all the popular parts (which happen to be expensive)

Whatever YOU want to hear, Romney is all for it.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0