0
brenthutch

GM to halt production of the VOLT

Recommended Posts

Yep. Meanwhile, the target average fuel economy standards were just announced to average fuel economy of 54.5 mpg by 2025 (up from 28.6 mpg last year). It was negotiated by the Gubment, the automakers and unions. (Yep - unions negotiate these things because average mpg are an important gauge of working conditions, wages and benefits).

Of course, they'll exempt pickups and SUVs. At least until 2020. So the target will be closer to 40 mpg.

Retooling the Volt plant on the heels of this agreement gives the definite impression that the new standards aren't what they say they are.


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

http://community.nasdaq.com/News/2012-08/gm-to-halt-making-chevy-volt-analyst-blog.aspx?storyid=168382

To retool to make their FULL SIZED sedan the Impala!

What ever happened to the "smart cars and plug-in hybrids that Americans want"?
RAOTFLMAO



HEY

You better think you want them

Thats what the government wants!!!
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

http://community.nasdaq.com/News/2012-08/gm-to-halt-making-chevy-volt-analyst-blog.aspx?storyid=168382

To retool to make their FULL SIZED sedan the Impala!

What ever happened to the "smart cars and plug-in hybrids that Americans want"?
RAOTFLMAO



www.freep.com/article/20120829/BUSINESS0101/120829079/Chevy-Volt-broke-monthly-sales-record-in-August?odyssey=nav%7Chead

"Chevy Volt broke monthly sales record in August as GM hails EV's momentum"
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Yep. Meanwhile, the target average fuel economy standards were just announced to average fuel economy of 54.5 mpg by 2025 (up from 28.6 mpg last year). It was negotiated by the Gubment, the automakers and unions. (Yep - unions negotiate these things because average mpg are an important gauge of working conditions, wages and benefits).

Of course, they'll exempt pickups and SUVs. At least until 2020. So the target will be closer to 40 mpg.



Can car drivers sue for equal protection? Although I like small cars by contemporary standards (think 1 series and A3 now that the 3 and A4 have grown to 5 and A6 dimensions) I still want SUV engine capacity and power (or more).

While I hope to have made enough millions by 2025 that I can buy cars made by up-market companies that don't care about such things I'm not counting on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

http://community.nasdaq.com/News/2012-08/gm-to-halt-making-chevy-volt-analyst-blog.aspx?storyid=168382

To retool to make their FULL SIZED sedan the Impala!

What ever happened to the "smart cars and plug-in hybrids that Americans want"?
RAOTFLMAO



www.freep.com/article/20120829/BUSINESS0101/120829079/Chevy-Volt-broke-monthly-sales-record-in-August?odyssey=nav%7Chead

"Chevy Volt broke monthly sales record in August as GM hails EV's momentum"



They sold 2 this month??? Wow
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


So how's GM doing these days since we own a portion of them????



Last I heard, taxpayers had lost about $28 billion on the deal.



And the non union employees that lost their retirment will go on welfare some day too adding to the cost

Of course, this was ONLY about the unions
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Yep. Meanwhile, the target average fuel economy standards were just announced
>to average fuel economy of 54.5 mpg by 2025 . . . .

Good. We have just started to become independent of foreign oil. The only way we will stay independent is to increase fuel efficiency.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>Can car drivers sue for equal protection?

Equal protection for what?



Equal protection under the law, as in an end to roadway racism, SUV supremacy, and oppression of a motor vehicle minority.

Quote

You'll still be able to get any size car you want.



But not with bigger thirstier engines the car companies will still be allowed to sell SUV drivers.

A world where some passenger vehicles are more equal than others because their makers have bribed legislators for favorable legal treatment is just wrong.

If 54.5 MPG is a good goal the standard should apply to _all_ passenger vehicles sold for personal use and not exempt a class of vehicles which has historically made up over half the market. If 40 MPG or whatever would otherwise result is good enough that should be the number for everyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Equal protection under the law, as in an end to roadway racism and SUV supremacy
>and oppression of a motor vehicle minority.

I like "roadway racism!" Forcing those minority vehicles to drive in the back of the lane.

>But not with bigger thirstier engines the car companies will still be allowed to sell SUV drivers.

Sure they will. We have CAFE requirements now, and still the Viper V10 has a 512 cubic inch engine. Do any SUV's have an engine that big?

The Tesla Roadster has one of the highest energy efficiencies on the road today. How many SUV's can beat its 0-60 time?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

http://community.nasdaq.com/News/2012-08/gm-to-halt-making-chevy-volt-analyst-blog.aspx?storyid=168382

To retool to make their FULL SIZED sedan the Impala!

What ever happened to the "smart cars and plug-in hybrids that Americans want"?
RAOTFLMAO



Go drill in Ogoni country. The natives will surely give your anti-renewable message a warm welcome.

Be humble, ask questions, listen, learn, follow the golden rule, talk when necessary, and know when to shut the fuck up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Yes. And the coal-powered power plants that power Electric Vehicles have a lot
>to do with it.

Interesting post:

1) Agreed, CO2 emissions do have a lot to do with arctic warming and resultant loss of ice.

2) In terms of overall CO2 emissions, the best you can do for transportation is solar to EV. There is CO2 involved in the production of the solar power system and car (as there is for any source of power or transportation) but once that is "paid" there is no further cost in carbon emissions.

3) Comparing an average small car (Honda Civic) to an average 100% grid charged EV*: 38% more CO2 from the gas powered car. Comparing an average small car to a 100% coal charged EV**: 10% more CO2 from the gas powered car.

So overall gas powered cars have more to do with it. As power sources get cleaner that will become more and more true.

(* - assuming standard US power mix)

(** - I don't know where you can find a utility that produces 100% of its power from coal, but presumably one exists somewhere.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You know I fall with Bill to a degree on this one. I really don't understand why we don't have a rolling goal for mileage. .05% to a 1% averaged. When we try to make these big jumps we get all sorts of push back from the car companies

Wonder what a VW beetle would be if we had improved at a 1% average......
Kevin Keenan is my hero, a double FUP, he does so much with so little

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Wonder what a VW beetle would be if we had improved at a 1% average......

Going from the 1967 model (29mpg) nowadays we'd have a Beetle that got 45mpg. Given that we have a few cars nowadays that can hit 45mpg, 1% a year probably isn't too unreasonable a goal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Or...business as usual with business...ignore the targets until the due date and then claim they are a financial hardship in order to delay them again.



Rather than MPG targets why not just start phasing out oil subsidies? :S
Stupidity if left untreated is self-correcting
If ya can't be good, look good, if that fails, make 'em laugh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Or...business as usual with business...ignore the targets until the due date and then claim they are a financial hardship in order to delay them again.



Rather than MPG targets why not just start phasing out oil subsidies? :S


Or we could follow Reagan and some other smart old-time Republicans and have a cap-and-trade on CO2 emissions.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>Wonder what a VW beetle would be if we had improved at a 1% average......

Going from the 1967 model (29mpg) nowadays we'd have a Beetle that got 45mpg. Given that we have a few cars nowadays that can hit 45mpg, 1% a year probably isn't too unreasonable a goal.



you can get incremental 1% improvements from steps like body lightening (substitute AL/CBF for Steel), but some of the steps are bigger jumps.

Legislatively you'd need to let them bank bigger years or run slight deficits in others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0