kelpdiver 2 #26 August 17, 2012 Quote Why? All he wants to do is turn this into a Palin bashing thread to distract from the topic. My thread, you want to bash Palin, go start one about her and bash away. it's virtually impossible to have a discussion of whether or not Biden is qualified to be VP (as obvious a question as the composition of water) without considering the giant lipstick wearing elephant in the room. This would be hard even without Rush insisting in the other thread, against all rational thinking, that she was substantially more qualified than he. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #27 August 18, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote About the same as the odds of Romney dropping Ryan due to his record of flip-flopping on stimulus, earmarks etc. You really can't help yourself, can you?Do you think Biden is capable of assuming the role of President if something were to happen to Obama? Did you think Palin was capable of assuming the role of President if something were to have happened to McCain? Is this thread about Palin? Have the stones to answer the question. Why? All he wants to do is turn this into a Palin bashing thread to distract from the topic. My thread, you want to bash Palin, go start one about her and bash away. Your unwillingness to answer says a lot about what you really believe about Palin but never had the stones to say.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #28 August 18, 2012 You must be hearing voices. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #29 August 18, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote About the same as the odds of Romney dropping Ryan due to his record of flip-flopping on stimulus, earmarks etc. You really can't help yourself, can you?Do you think Biden is capable of assuming the role of President if something were to happen to Obama? Did you think Palin was capable of assuming the role of President if something were to have happened to McCain? Is this thread about Palin? Have the stones to answer the question. Why? All he wants to do is turn this into a Palin bashing thread to distract from the topic. My thread, you want to bash Palin, go start one about her and bash away. Your unwillingness to answer says a lot about what you really believe about Palin but never had the stones to say. I will answer, Pailin, Christine O'Donnell, and Sharron Angel, were and are unmitigated morons, brainless bimbos that do as much to advance the cause of small government as Joe Biden does to advance the cause of big government. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
