0
jclalor

Tennessee Republican Primary Candidates Wage Anti-Islam Contest

Recommended Posts

It's funny how all the Tea Baggers, while wrapped in the constitution, get their panties all in a twist when it comes to gun control yet they have no problem blatantly denying others their rights.

Quote

"I will work to stop the Islamization of our society, and do everything possible to prevent Sharia law from circumventing our laws and our Constitution," Zelenik said.





http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/01/tennessee-republican-primary_n_1731206.html?utm_hp_ref=elections-2012

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>So you think it's OK to circumvent the Constitution with Sharia Law?

Nope, it's never OK. But you can agree to use Sharia rules in your business dealings - just like you can agree to use NFL rules when playing a football game or USPA rules when opening a DZ. None of those things "circumvent" the Constitution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>What's the problem again?

"I will work to stop extreme sports from damaging our society, and do everything possible to prevent USPA BSR's from circumventing our laws and our Constitution."

If he said that, I'd think that guy was sorta anti-USPA - and by extension anti-skydiver.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Quote

"I will work to stop the Islamization of our society, and do everything possible to prevent Sharia law from circumventing our laws and our Constitution," Zelenik said.




Translation: "I will whip up the constituency over non-existent threats to further my political ambitions."

The hysteria over Sharia law is ridiculous. Unless it is enacted by our legislators and put into US law, it has no effect on us.
"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It's funny how all the Tea Baggers, while wrapped in the constitution, get their panties all in a twist when it comes to gun control yet they have no problem blatantly denying others their rights.



And yet you would not get up in arms if someone had said:
"I will work to stop the Christianization of our society, and do everything possible to prevent Christian based law from circumventing our laws and our Constitution,"

I personally would not support sharia law, or any other religion based law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

It's funny how all the Tea Baggers, while wrapped in the constitution, get their panties all in a twist when it comes to gun control yet they have no problem blatantly denying others their rights.



And yet you would not get up in arms if someone had said:
"I will work to stop the Christianization of our society, and do everything possible to prevent Christian based law from circumventing our laws and our Constitution,"

I personally would not support sharia law, or any other religion based law.



The laws against gay marriage are an example of religion based laws.

I've yet to see Islamic religion interfere in American life....but the Christian churches are constantly at it, as well as in the school systems banning books like Huck Finn or Harry Potter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The laws against gay marriage are an example of religion based laws.



Show where I support them.

Quote

I've yet to see Islamic religion interfere in American life



9/11 ring a bell?

Quote

but the Christian churches are constantly at it, as well as in the school systems banning books like Huck Finn or Harry Potter.



Show where I support the Christin church, or book bans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

The laws against gay marriage are an example of religion based laws.



Show where I support them.



I make no such claim. I only address your assertion of hypocrisy in the previous post that people object more to Christianity than Islam, presumably out of some PC thing where Islam is cooler than Jesus.

No, it's because the Christians keep interfering in our lives. And if your counter to that is 9/11, a terrorist act, then I'll give you Oklahoma City in return.

Orthodox Muslims may decide to live their lives by Sharia law, and buy houses only in approved methods, but I haven't seen them propose laws insisting I do the same, or not eat pork.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I make no such claim. I only address your assertion of hypocrisy in the previous post that people object more to Christianity than Islam, presumably out of some PC thing where Islam is cooler than Jesus.



When did I say "the people"??? I said him. Are you speaking for him now?

Quote

No, it's because the Christians keep interfering in our lives. And if your counter to that is 9/11, a terrorist act, then I'll give you Oklahoma City in return.



Great, but your claim was, "I've yet to see Islamic religion interfere in American life"....And to that, I'd say 9/11 was interference. You will also note, but may not admit, that I never said Christianity does not interfere. So your OKC example is moot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>So you think it's OK to circumvent the Constitution with Sharia Law?

Nope, it's never OK. But you can agree to use Sharia rules in your business dealings - just like you can agree to use NFL rules when playing a football game or USPA rules when opening a DZ. None of those things "circumvent" the Constitution.



I think more appropriate examples would be "Is O.K. for one Muslim to cut off the hand of another Muslim if he got caught stealing from him?"

Or maybe in a pre-nuptual it states "If the wife is accused of adultery by two males of the husbands family, the husband gets to bury her up to her neck and throw stones at her head until she is dead," is that OK?

Both are common practices in sharia law.
"There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss."
Life, the Universe, and Everything

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>"Is O.K. for one Muslim to cut off the hand of another Muslim if he got caught stealing from him?"

Good example. No, it's not OK; that's a crime. (Just like it's not OK to kill homosexuals even if the Bible commands people to do that.)

>Or maybe in a pre-nuptual it states "If the wife is accused of adultery by two males of
>the husbands family, the husband gets to bury her up to her neck and throw stones at
>her head until she is dead," is that OK?

Nope, that's not OK either. That's murder.

Now let's use another example. Let's say that in your will, you want to leave a third of your estate to your best friend who supported and your family you throughout your life. (The concept of wasiyya, or bequests.) Should a US judge void that part of your will because it is part of Sharia law?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Now let's use another example. Let's say that in your will, you want to leave a third of your estate to your best friend who supported and your family you throughout your life. (The concept of wasiyya, or bequests.) Should a US judge void that part of your will because it is part of Sharia law?



No, the use of Sharia Law in those instances are acceptable.

So it seems we are in agreement. The use of Sharia Law is OK in civil matters amongst Muslims as long as it doesn't conflict with current U.S. laws, Values or the Constitution.

Was that difficult? :P
"There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss."
Life, the Universe, and Everything

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>I personally would not support sharia law, or any other religion based law.

Do you refuse to work at places that shut down on the Sabbath?



So many problems with your argument:

1. Which Sabbath? Shabbat? First-day Sabbath? Seventh-Day Sabbath?

2. A Company does not make law. It is a company practice.

3. Being non-religious, I do not participate in a sabbath... Although I do recognize YOUR right to recognize one or participate in one.... Same as I recognize Chick-Fil-A's right to close on Sunday.

But to answer your question..... I have worked most of my adult life at Companies that are open both Saturday and Sunday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>No, the use of Sharia Law in those instances are acceptable.

Cool, sounds like we agree.



Great, now if you would, please tell jcalor that I am not a hate filled bigot just because I associate with the tea party.
"There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss."
Life, the Universe, and Everything

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0