kallend 2,129 #51 August 4, 2012 QuoteThe combined global land and ocean average surface temperature for January–June 2012 was the 11th warmest on record And how is that remotely relevant to a TREND? Attached.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #52 August 4, 2012 Quote QuoteThe combined global land and ocean average surface temperature for January–June 2012 was the 11th warmest on record And how is that remotely relevant to a TREND? Attached. The chart you attached was the "adjusted trend” The raw data indicates no increase. that is why the trend has to be "adjusted" I have far too much respect for your intellect to suggest that for one second that you believe anything that you have just posted. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,129 #53 August 4, 2012 QuoteQuote QuoteThe combined global land and ocean average surface temperature for January–June 2012 was the 11th warmest on record And how is that remotely relevant to a TREND? Attached. The chart you attached was the "adjusted trend” The raw data indicates no increase. that is why the trend has to be "adjusted" I have far too much respect for your intellect to suggest that for one second that you believe anything that you have just posted. It's adjusted to account for KNOWN effects such as the southern oscillation, volcanoes, and measured aerosol albedo variations, which account for fluctuations superimposed on the warming trend.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #54 August 4, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Quote The combined global land and ocean average surface temperature for January–June 2012 was the 11th warmest on record And how is that remotely relevant to a TREND? Attached. The chart you attached was the "adjusted trend” The raw data indicates no increase. that is why the trend has to be "adjusted" I have far too much respect for your intellect to suggest that for one second that you believe anything that you have just posted. It's adjusted to account for KNOWN effects such as the southern oscillation, volcanoes, and measured aerosol albedo variations, which account for fluctuations superimposed on the warming trend. It's probably a lost cause trying to explain to some people the basic concepts of multiple regression analysis. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 444 #55 August 5, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote The combined global land and ocean average surface temperature for January–June 2012 was the 11th warmest on record And how is that remotely relevant to a TREND? Attached. The chart you attached was the "adjusted trend” The raw data indicates no increase. that is why the trend has to be "adjusted" I have far too much respect for your intellect to suggest that for one second that you believe anything that you have just posted. It's adjusted to account for KNOWN effects such as the southern oscillation, volcanoes, and measured aerosol albedo variations, which account for fluctuations superimposed on the warming trend. It's probably a lost cause trying to explain to some people the basic concepts of multiple regression analysis. Yep especially when one of the variables is a political agenda! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,092 #56 August 5, 2012 >Yep especially when one of the variables is a political agenda! Agreed. Denialism (and alarmism) can get in the way of understanding the science. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
.thumb.jpg.4bb795e2eaf21b8b300039a5e1ec7f92.jpg)