Coreece 190
Recommended Posts
Quote
Exactly. In any confrontation the only two options are to open fire into a crowd or sit down and wait to be shot.
precisely describing the stance of several posters, Bill.
Skyrad 0
I actually wonder if this loon was trying out a temporal illusion experiment to see if he could change the past. I know that sounds nuts but hey we're talking about a guy who dyed his barnet red and shot up a cinema.
When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Skyrad 0
Interestingly you are the first person either in SC or on media outlets who have called this man what he is a 'domestic terrorist'.
When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Lucius Annaeus Seneca
QuoteInterestingly you are the first person either in SC or on media outlets who have called this man what he is a 'domestic terrorist'.
Call 'em like I see 'em.
The media wouldn't even call the Ft. Hood shooter a terrorist, so I'm not going to hold my breath on this one.
Being someone who enjoys reading conspiracy theories (even though I think 99% of them have stepped off in the deep end), there are some being floated around now about the shooting. There are some variations, but mainly the prescribe to the shooter having been trained like a Manchurian Candidate. That he was acting with out choice or thought due to deep psychological conditioning. Also that his gear was funded by the same and that it is all part of the New World Order's push to disarm US citizens so there will be less chance of resistance when the revolution starts.
I'm sure that the entire psychological condition was completed in the base under Denver International using technology provided by the Greys under orders by the reptile shape shifters who control the world.
For me though, the guy is a domestic terrorist and should be tried as such.
--"When I die, may I be surrounded by scattered chrome and burning gasoline."
Skyrad 0
Quote
I'm sure that the entire psychological condition was completed in the base under Denver International using technology provided by the Greys under orders by the reptile shape shifters who control the world.
Truly some people are nuttier than squirrel shit.When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Lucius Annaeus Seneca
QuoteQuoteYup. No sweat.
And if after the first individual opens fire another individual begins to open fire behind you will you be able to decide whether that person is with the first person?
Don't be silly! Just wait until the third person starts shooting and then you'll see what direction the second and third are shooting and you'll know for sure what direction you should start shooting.
QuoteWhy is it so difficult for people to admit that a gun or few in the audience just wouldn't have likely made a difference? The shooter was well prepared and successfully implemented a surprise, incapacitate, and overwhelm strategy. It's unlikely that a theater crowded with panicking people would have provided many opportunities clear shots, and the tear gas made it unlikely any such opportunity could be successfully utilized.
You just don't get it, do ya? The people in the audience who are carrying concealed weaponry are all sane, responsible, well-trained, and courageous like wolves. They won't be affected by the panicking common sheep-dog people in the crowd. They are there to help!
QuoteQuoteQuoteYup. No sweat.
And if after the first individual opens fire another individual begins to open fire behind you will you be able to decide whether that person is with the first person?
Is this second shooter also wearing a gas mask, tactical helmet, and body armor while carrying an AR-15, a pump action shotty, and two pistols?
That's entirely possible in this hypothetical scenario.
QuoteInterestingly you are the first person either in SC or on media outlets who have called this man what he is a 'domestic terrorist'.
The Department of Defense Dictionary of Military Terms defines terrorism as:
The calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.
I wouldn't consider this guy a terrorist just yet. It could just turn out that he is simply a highly deranged gun-nut.
QuoteQuoteInterestingly you are the first person either in SC or on media outlets who have called this man what he is a 'domestic terrorist'.
Call 'em like I see 'em.
The media wouldn't even call the Ft. Hood shooter a terrorist, so I'm not going to hold my breath on this one.
Being someone who enjoys reading conspiracy theories (even though I think 99% of them have stepped off in the deep end), there are some being floated around now about the shooting. There are some variations, but mainly the prescribe to the shooter having been trained like a Manchurian Candidate. That he was acting with out choice or thought due to deep psychological conditioning. Also that his gear was funded by the same and that it is all part of the New World Order's push to disarm US citizens so there will be less chance of resistance when the revolution starts.
I'm sure that the entire psychological condition was completed in the base under Denver International using technology provided by the Greys under orders by the reptile shape shifters who control the world.
For me though, the guy is a domestic terrorist and should be tried as such.
I'm going to forward your theory to Darrell Issa. I think it's something he can work with.
Butters 0
Skyrad 0
QuoteQuoteInterestingly you are the first person either in SC or on media outlets who have called this man what he is a 'domestic terrorist'.
The Department of Defense Dictionary of Military Terms defines terrorism as:
The calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.
I wouldn't consider this guy a terrorist just yet. It could just turn out that he is simply a highly deranged gun-nut.
I don't need the DoD of a foreign government with a dodgy history of bending definitions on combatants, non combatant and terrorist to its own internationally illegal political goals to explain to me what a terrorist is... But point taken.
When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Skyrad 0
QuoteWatch this situation to understand that conceal and carry can work but isn't likely to work in the previous situation.
I wonder what they put their colour up on the headlines for, would they have done that if they'd both been white?
When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Quote
I sometimes wonder if, for a certain sub-set of humanity, every decision actually is binary. Maybe this is the same sub-set who don't recognize irony or sub-text.
There are 10 type of people in the world...
"What if there were no hypothetical questions?"
QuoteQuote
I sometimes wonder if, for a certain sub-set of humanity, every decision actually is binary. Maybe this is the same sub-set who don't recognize irony or sub-text.
There are 10 type of people in the world...
0001
0010
0011
0100
0101
0110
0111
1000
1001
1010
Your answer...
Why is it so difficult for people to admit that laws against guns wouldn't have likely made a difference?
That's what all this is about...isn't is obvious?
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites