kelpdiver 2 #51 July 17, 2012 Quote You're not going to find any pictures if that's what you're looking for, but there's always going to be speculation about anyone who is in their mid-50s, never been married or had children. Not that any of those are definitive items, but in combination they do lead some people to question and speculation on Rice goes back to at least her time in the 43rd. or she's a career woman. Not being married is still a sin, but hardly the same one suggested here. But really, what women or minorities are going to vote for her? Her actions during the war branded her as Auntie Tom. And the Hoover Institute isn't exactly an outreach organization to the moderate or the left. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
loumeinhart 0 #52 July 17, 2012 Quotewhat women or minorities are going to vote for her? She would get some votes, but I think would have been a better fit for someone like Santorum. Not Romney. Biden should know by Friday who he gets to debate Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rstanley0312 1 #53 July 17, 2012 QuoteQuotewhat women or minorities are going to vote for her? She would get some votes, but I think would have been a better fit for someone like Santorum. Not Romney. Biden should know by Friday who he gets to debate I hope you are wrong! It would be STUPID to announce the veep pick prior to the convention!Life is all about ass....either you're kicking it, kissing it, working it off, or trying to get a piece of it. Muff Brother #4382 Dudeist Skydiver #000 www.fundraiseadventure.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #54 July 17, 2012 QuoteShe also does not currently follow the Republican party line on abortion. This is the final nail. that's not so goofy as it seem - although the country is pretty much 50/50, and choosing a VP like Condi would, in reality do a LOT of good in the election, we still see that time and time again, that candidate selection by either party continues to be defined by their far off 5% splinter I am continually amazed how BOTH parties will sometimes find a mediocre Presidential candidate, but still one with a pretty good chance, then they assign a nutbag for VP and completely ruin their chances. I suspect the Pres candidate has to be a bit centrist to even get in, then they pick a winger for VP to placate the party leadership (normally run by nutbags themselves). They really need to pick a VP that would appeal 'beyond' the centrists just a bit to scavenge votes from those leaning slightly to the other team. I mean, seriously, Biden is an idiot, Palin was a crappy strategic move. The wingers are so fanatic, they vote against the other party. they'd vote for a dirty old shoe as long the R or D is next to their name. there is no need to pander to them in any way, especially when you get more bang for the buck with a centrist VP partner. I'm convinced that Romney will pick someone like a Santorum (religious nut) instead of someone like Rubio or Rice (that would help him win) or someone fairly neutral like Pawlenty (that would at least not hurt him). Thus turning the election into a battle between two really crappy choices.....again ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #55 July 17, 2012 Quote>Well I think the lesson to be learned was that the wolf eventually came, didn't he? Given that we've had steadily increasing levels of wealth, quality of life, personal rights and lifespan, if a wolf has come - he's a pretty nice one. That is what one would call a wolf in sheep's clothing. Rome was pretty good for the wealthy and priviledged before it burned. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
loumeinhart 0 #56 July 17, 2012 QuoteI hope you are wrong! You're right. I mistook 'decision' for 'announcement' Any thoughts on the speculation that President Obama will pick a new running mate? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #57 July 17, 2012 QuoteQuoteI hope you are wrong! You're right. I mistook 'decision' for 'announcement' Any thoughts on the speculation that President Obama will pick a new running mate? He would be well advised to do that. I suspect if Romney chooses someone like Rubio, Biden would suddenly become a liability if they debate. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,116 #58 July 17, 2012 >She also does not currently follow the Republican party line on abortion. Well, not even Romney follows that. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #59 July 17, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteI hope you are wrong! You're right. I mistook 'decision' for 'announcement' Any thoughts on the speculation that President Obama will pick a new running mate? He would be well advised to do that. I suspect if Romney chooses someone like Rubio, Biden would suddenly become a liability if they debate. Not a rat's chance in hell Biden isn't the Democrat VP candidate. Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #60 July 17, 2012 QuoteYou may be miserable, but by any standards we're doing better than ever. I may be going through a personal family funk right now but I've certainly seen worse days...this too shall pass, but I'm not so optimistic about the rest of the world as a whole...A world on which we have become desperately dependent. This last economic escapade should've never happened....and I find miserable human behavior to be the root cause of it. Quotehe vast majority of people out there just want to live their lives and raise their families in peace, and this is a pretty good time to do that. I hope you're right...these are exciting times for you. QuoteAnd keep in mind there are still some people alive who lived through World War II; more still who lived through the Korean War and Vietnam. ...and I think one of the main reasons we were able to survive times like those was because we were primarily self sufficient and didn't have to depend on other countries who despise us.Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #61 July 17, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI hope you are wrong! You're right. I mistook 'decision' for 'announcement' Any thoughts on the speculation that President Obama will pick a new running mate? He would be well advised to do that. I suspect if Romney chooses someone like Rubio, Biden would suddenly become a liability if they debate. Not a rat's chance in hell Biden isn't the Democrat VP candidate. Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional. No doubt he will be. The question is will he be an asset or a liability? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shotgun 1 #62 July 17, 2012 Quote The question is will he be an asset or a liability? Well, after all these years, I still have a crush on Joe, so I say asset. But that's just me . . . (Hey, don't judge! ) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,116 #63 July 17, 2012 >This last economic escapade should've never happened.... Agreed there. But they do keep happening; we often seem to have an aversion to learning from the past. >and I find miserable human behavior to be the root cause of it. Well, the same greed that caused most of the problems also makes capitalism work, so I'd hesitate to say it's all bad. >and I think one of the main reasons we were able to survive times like those was >because we were primarily self sufficient and didn't have to depend on other countries >who despise us. And most countries didn't despise us. We're still largely self sufficient; getting back to 100% self sufficiency would mean returning to a pre-1940's standard of living but it is certainly doable. We do still grow more food than we need. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 30 #64 July 17, 2012 Quote Quote The question is will he be an asset or a liability? Well, after all these years, I still have a crush on Joe, so I say asset. But that's just me . . . (Hey, don't judge! ) YKINMKBYKIOKRemster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #66 July 17, 2012 QuoteYKINMKBYKIOK I think it's neat that all these abbreviations are used enough that I can now look them up. It was pretty rough the first few years for someone a UN-web savvy as me. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #67 July 17, 2012 Quote I hope you are wrong! It would be STUPID to announce the veep pick prior to the convention! Why? If the decision gets made this week, why keep it a secret for 5 weeks merely for dramatic effect, when instead that's 5 weeks where you have the second half of the ticket campaigning for victory. That sounds stupid to me. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #68 July 18, 2012 QuoteQuote I hope you are wrong! It would be STUPID to announce the veep pick prior to the convention! Because the announcement of the VP always results in a bump in the polls. Timing is important. Plus, at this point Romney is the presumed nominee. Why? If the decision gets made this week, why keep it a secret for 5 weeks merely for dramatic effect, when instead that's 5 weeks where you have the second half of the ticket campaigning for victory. That sounds stupid to me. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #69 July 18, 2012 QuoteDecision is supposed to be this week. I think he should tap Oprah Winfrey. He might not win, but it would not be boring. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #70 July 18, 2012 No-one will be Romney's VP, because Romney won't be elected. Did you mean VP candidate?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #71 July 18, 2012 Quote No-one will be Romney's VP, because Romney won't be elected. Did you mean VP candidate? Anyone who thinks they can predict the results of an election this far in advance is either an idiot or a fool. Or both. Wouldn't you agree? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #72 July 18, 2012 Quote Quote No-one will be Romney's VP, because Romney won't be elected. Did you mean VP candidate? Anyone who thinks they can predict the results of an election this far in advance is either an idiot or a fool. Or both. Wouldn't you agree? I don't think the American people will elect a liar/felon even though some people "don't care" about that.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #73 July 18, 2012 Quote Quote Quote No-one will be Romney's VP, because Romney won't be elected. Did you mean VP candidate? Anyone who thinks they can predict the results of an election this far in advance is either an idiot or a fool. Or both. Wouldn't you agree? I don't think the American people will elect a liar/felon even though some people "don't care" about that. They elected Clinton didn't they? BTW, let me know when Romney is arrested for being a felon. Just in case I missed it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #74 July 18, 2012 Quote Quote No-one will be Romney's VP, because Romney won't be elected. Did you mean VP candidate? Anyone who thinks they can predict the results of an election this far in advance is either an idiot or a fool. Or both. Wouldn't you agree? You could address that question to the individual who originated the thread.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #75 July 18, 2012 Quote Quote Quote No-one will be Romney's VP, because Romney won't be elected. Did you mean VP candidate? Anyone who thinks they can predict the results of an election this far in advance is either an idiot or a fool. Or both. Wouldn't you agree? You could address that question to the individual who originated the thread. Any clear-headed person understood the question. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
