jclalor 12 #26 May 30, 2012 You can still get a weapon at a gun show with no background check in Arizona. (So much for GCA 68) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #27 May 30, 2012 QuoteYou can still get a weapon at a gun show with no background check in Arizona. (So much for GCA 68) It is still illegal to buy or sell to a person with a mental illness.... (So much for your claim) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #28 May 30, 2012 QuoteIt is still illegal to buy or sell to a person with a mental illness.... (So much for your claim) The mentally ill are not always so candid. QuoteHer comments come on the heels of New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg releasing videos Monday taken by undercover agents at a Phoenix gun show just 15 days after the Tucson shootings. There, Arizona private investigators hired by New York City were able to purchase weapons not only without a background check but, at least twice, after admitting to sellers they probably would not pass. http://azdailysun.com/news/local/article_f2cf1b2c-2d82-11e0-9fe7-001cc4c03286.html So theoretically, The mentaly ill could never be convicted for claiming to be sane while purchasing a weapon. They could just plead insanity. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #29 May 30, 2012 QuoteThe mentally ill are not always so candid. Still illegal per the CGA of 1968. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #30 May 31, 2012 QuoteYou can still get a weapon at a gun show with no background check in Arizona. Only from a private seller. Quote (So much for GCA 68) So much for your UNDERSTANDING of GCA 68.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
popsjumper 2 #31 May 31, 2012 "Congress should......not force states to recognize the permits issued to individuals by other states."" I agree with this even though it sucks to have the goobermint incessantly snipping away at our constitutional rights at every turn. (Yes, yes, I omitted the part about law enforcement's views.) We as a country are dead set on reducing ourselves to the lowest common denominator.My reality and yours are quite different. I think we're all Bozos on this bus. Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #32 May 31, 2012 Quote"Congress should......not force states to recognize the permits issued to individuals by other states..." I agree with this... Would you also apply that to driver's licenses, marriage licenses and other state legal permits? If I wanted to drive cross-country, you would require me to get a dozen or more state driver's licenses to do that legally? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #33 May 31, 2012 Quote"Congress should......not force states to recognize the permits issued to individuals by other states."" I agree with this even though it sucks to have the goobermint incessantly snipping away at our constitutional rights at every turn. (Yes, yes, I omitted the part about law enforcement's views.) We as a country are dead set on reducing ourselves to the lowest common denominator. Disagree: Article IV, Section 1: "Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. And the Congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof."Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Southern_Man 0 #34 May 31, 2012 QuoteQuote"Congress should......not force states to recognize the permits issued to individuals by other states..." I agree with this... marriage licenses Currently this is exactly the situation with regards to same sex marriage licenses."What if there were no hypothetical questions?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
