mnealtx 0 #1 April 19, 2012 Link. Hardly a surprise from Senator "A gun for me but not for thee" Feinstein. Hopefully saner heads can get the votes out to get past the hold.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Southern_Man 0 #2 April 19, 2012 What is required to get past a hold? I thought a hold was one of those "senatorial privilidges" which couldn't be overriden?"What if there were no hypothetical questions?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #3 April 19, 2012 QuoteWhat is required to get past a hold? I thought a hold was one of those "senatorial privilidges" which couldn't be overriden? this isn't like that. She just refused to let them do it quickly. The article covers it in more detail. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davjohns 1 #4 April 20, 2012 That story is full of so much rubbish. She's a poltiician and one of the elite. Annoying how she's twisting things. Most states already recognize each others' permits. It only makes sense, really. Law enforcement would hardly be in greater danger from licensed owners. And her statement assumes out of state motorists pose a greater threat than domestic. Rubbish. The Trayvon Martin incident is standard politician flag waving with the hot issue of the day. Making policy decisions on things like that are called 'knee jerk reactions' in a disparaging manner for a reason. Then, there's the quotes at the end that speak for all legislators and their unified view toward the gun lobby. Anyone who pretends to speak for such a diverse group like that indicates to me that they are lying and hoping I'm stupid enough to believe them. I'm not saying I'm necessarily for the legislation. I'll think about it. I just hate attempts to obscure sound policy promulgation with emotion and lies.I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #5 April 20, 2012 I thought you guys were big on state's right's? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #6 April 20, 2012 QuoteI thought you guys were big on state's right's? Like a bill where states recognize each others' papers, you mean?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #7 April 20, 2012 QuoteThat story is full of so much rubbish. She's a poltiician and one of the elite. Annoying how she's twisting things. Most states already recognize each others' permits. It only makes sense, really. Law enforcement would hardly be in greater danger from licensed owners. And her statement assumes out of state motorists pose a greater threat than domestic. Rubbish. The Trayvon Martin incident is standard politician flag waving with the hot issue of the day. Making policy decisions on things like that are called 'knee jerk reactions' in a disparaging manner for a reason. Then, there's the quotes at the end that speak for all legislators and their unified view toward the gun lobby. Anyone who pretends to speak for such a diverse group like that indicates to me that they are lying and hoping I'm stupid enough to believe them. I'm not saying I'm necessarily for the legislation. I'll think about it. I just hate attempts to obscure sound policy promulgation with emotion and lies. No, most states dont Many recognize Utah's permits But Utah will not issue a permit to someone out of state until that person has a permit from the state they are in Example MN does not recognize IA's permits But is does Utah's AZ permits are recognized by KS and OK But KS and OK do not recognize Iowa's Its a mess"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #8 April 20, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteI thought you guys were big on state's right's? Like a bill where states recognize each others' papers, you mean? ? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #9 April 20, 2012 QuoteQuoteThat story is full of so much rubbish. She's a poltiician and one of the elite. Annoying how she's twisting things. Most states already recognize each others' permits. It only makes sense, really. Law enforcement would hardly be in greater danger from licensed owners. And her statement assumes out of state motorists pose a greater threat than domestic. Rubbish. The Trayvon Martin incident is standard politician flag waving with the hot issue of the day. Making policy decisions on things like that are called 'knee jerk reactions' in a disparaging manner for a reason. Then, there's the quotes at the end that speak for all legislators and their unified view toward the gun lobby. Anyone who pretends to speak for such a diverse group like that indicates to me that they are lying and hoping I'm stupid enough to believe them. I'm not saying I'm necessarily for the legislation. I'll think about it. I just hate attempts to obscure sound policy promulgation with emotion and lies. No, most states dont Many recognize Utah's permits But Utah will not issue a permit to someone out of state until that person has a permit from the state they are in Example MN does not recognize IA's permits But is does Utah's AZ permits are recognized by KS and OK But KS and OK do not recognize Iowa's Its a mess He's not claiming that most states recognize *every other* states' CHL, rush...just that reciprocity is there among many states, which is true. A fair number of states will return reciprocity to any state that recognizes their license.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #10 April 20, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteThat story is full of so much rubbish. She's a poltiician and one of the elite. Annoying how she's twisting things. Most states already recognize each others' permits. It only makes sense, really. Law enforcement would hardly be in greater danger from licensed owners. And her statement assumes out of state motorists pose a greater threat than domestic. Rubbish. The Trayvon Martin incident is standard politician flag waving with the hot issue of the day. Making policy decisions on things like that are called 'knee jerk reactions' in a disparaging manner for a reason. Then, there's the quotes at the end that speak for all legislators and their unified view toward the gun lobby. Anyone who pretends to speak for such a diverse group like that indicates to me that they are lying and hoping I'm stupid enough to believe them. I'm not saying I'm necessarily for the legislation. I'll think about it. I just hate attempts to obscure sound policy promulgation with emotion and lies. No, most states dont Many recognize Utah's permits But Utah will not issue a permit to someone out of state until that person has a permit from the state they are in Example MN does not recognize IA's permits But is does Utah's AZ permits are recognized by KS and OK But KS and OK do not recognize Iowa's Its a mess He's not claiming that most states recognize *every other* states' CHL, rush...just that reciprocity is there among many states, which is true. A fair number of states will return reciprocity to any state that recognizes their license. You are correct There is some But not as much as many think As my examples point out The only reason I got th Utah permit is because I live a mile from the MN border MN does not recognize Iowa's permit Very few do"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #11 April 20, 2012 Here is some good info on reciprocity http://www.usacarry.com/concealed_carry_permit_reciprocity_maps.html"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
matthewcline 0 #12 April 20, 2012 I am, right after Individual Rights. MattAn Instructors first concern is student safety. So, start being safe, first!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #13 April 20, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI thought you guys were big on state's right's? Like a bill where states recognize each others' papers, you mean? ? Your driver's license is valid in all states, both as a form of ID and as a license to drive. You are expected to know and obey the local state's variations on traffic law. They are suggesting the same should be done for CCW, in part because gun ownership (if not carry) is protected by 2nd, whereas driving is merely a priviledge. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #14 April 22, 2012 QuoteI thought you guys were big on state's right's? Yes, the 2nd should really be all we would ever need, but the left does not see it that way. And I am for States rights, are you? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #15 April 22, 2012 QuoteYour driver's license is valid in all states, both as a form of ID and as a license to drive. You are expected to know and obey the local state's variations on traffic law. Just not marriage licenses. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #16 April 22, 2012 QuoteQuote***I thought you guys were big on state's right's? Yes, the 2nd should really be all we would ever need, but the left does not see it that way. And I am for States rights, are you? I never said a state has a right to ban them. So if anyone can carry in Arizona, even with a major mental illness, they could carry anywhere they want? What about free speech? What is considered protected speech varies from state to state . I'm sure the good and godly people of Alabama don't want my California obscenity laws to be forced upon them. All you would-be Harry callahan's are just gonna have to chill. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #17 April 23, 2012 Quote QuoteYour driver's license is valid in all states, both as a form of ID and as a license to drive. You are expected to know and obey the local state's variations on traffic law. Just not marriage licenses. they were recognized across states until the politics around gay marriage popped up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GeorgiaDon 385 #18 April 24, 2012 QuoteQuote QuoteYour driver's license is valid in all states, both as a form of ID and as a license to drive. You are expected to know and obey the local state's variations on traffic law. Just not marriage licenses. they were recognized across states until the politics around gay marriage popped up.It wasn't all that long ago that interracial marriages weren't recognized across stat lines. Certainly, within living memory for lots of people. Don_____________________________________ Tolerance is the cost we must pay for our adventure in liberty. (Dworkin, 1996) “Education is not filling a bucket, but lighting a fire.” (Yeats) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #19 April 24, 2012 Quote***QuoteQuote ***Your driver's license is valid in all states, both as a form of ID and as a license to drive. You are expected to know and obey the local state's variations on traffic law. Just not marriage licenses. they were recognized across states until the politics around gay marriage popped up. That was my point. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
popsjumper 2 #20 April 24, 2012 First, yes, I am for State's Rights. Just like Matt, after individual rights. Yes, each state can make whatever laws they deem fit for their populace. Individual states can, and do, make laws that conflict with each other. Nothing new there. All is well and good. What is NOT good is when those laws conflict with our constitution which applies on the national level. Fortunately, we have recourse through the federal court system up to and including the Supreme Court which, allegedly, operates outside the realm of politics. Sadly, that not so much true anymore...if it ever was. So, what we are left with is yes, laws differ from state to state and there's really no requirement that one state recognize the laws of another state. While reciprocity is nice in that it eliminates a lot of confusion and that it protects visiting people from being jailed because of lack of knowledge, it's by no means required. When you travel from state to state you may be subjecting yourself to detainment even though you are legal in your home state. Feinstein and co. are promoting that endangerment at this time. Be careful. Such is life. Besides that, she's just a bozo anyway. My reality and yours are quite different. I think we're all Bozos on this bus. Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 3 #21 April 24, 2012 So you're motivated by a fear of clowns? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #22 April 24, 2012 Quote So you're motivated by a fear of clowns? Given the constant flow of posts like this it seems a bit off that you post to me about being dismisive and not being about you 10 for 10?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 3 #23 April 24, 2012 Another astute bullseye, Marc. Hey, thanks for keeping me honest. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #24 May 30, 2012 QuoteSo if anyone can carry in Arizona, even with a major mental illness, they could carry anywhere they want? Read the GCA 68. You are trying to use a false analogy to make an emotional argument. QuoteAll you would-be Harry callahan's are just gonna have to chill. Ah, the best you can do now is insults? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #25 May 30, 2012 Besides that, she's just a bozo anyway. Hey, that's a PA on Bozos! "My mother was a Bozoette in High School..." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites