Recommended Posts
mnealtx 0
Quote
QuoteSame old Dem tactics. It gets the newsies talking about the SS investigating Nugent instead of underage Colombi***an prostitutes, so it's another PR 'win' for the Obama side.
The SS has always been known to be bi-partisian, this fact has never been in dispute. The right however realizes that the least educated among us will, if prompted, think there is a connection to Obama.
Guess that explains why you connected Obama to it in the first place.
QuoteMitt has blown this one one by keeping silent about Nugent, no need to pander any more to the nutty right for the nomination.
Let us know when Obama and Carney figure out which Hilary Rosen made those 30+ visits to the White House, ok?
QuoteHe needs to appeal to the very "middle of the road" independants, if he has any chance to win.
From the poster who stated that LaRouche was the only chance the country has left.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
SkyDekker 1,465
QuoteSo, just WHERE did I say the SS was trying to cover anything up?
Nice tap dance buddy.

Quote*Again* with the 'mercenary' bullshit? Didn't you embarrass yourself enough the *last* time you tried that?
Right, contractor. Nice little word game you like to play. Like enemy combatant. Funny how you like to be PC when it suits you

mnealtx 0
QuoteQuoteSo, just WHERE did I say the SS was trying to cover anything up?
Nice tap dance buddy.![]()
"It gets the newsies talking about..."
Reading evidently isn't as fundamental as it used to be.
QuoteQuote*Again* with the 'mercenary' bullshit? Didn't you embarrass yourself enough the *last* time you tried that?
Right, contractor. Nice little word game you like to play. Like enemy combatant. Funny how you like to be PC when it suits you![]()
Well, by all means provide your proof, then. You could start by showing me under arms and carrying out a military mission...you know, mercenary-style stuff.
Prove your cite.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
SkyDekker 1,465
Quote"It gets the newsies talking about..."
Right, the liberal media is going to help the SS.
Logical thinking is obviously not a strong suit.
QuoteWell, by all means provide your proof, then.
You have provided your own proof often enough. No need for me to dig it up. Time to get all Politically Correct when it suits you.
(I think this is the longest you have actually tried to stay on topic, I guess that is a little bit of progress for you. Golf Clap)
mnealtx 0
QuoteQuote"It gets the newsies talking about..."
Right, the liberal media is going to help the SS.
Logical thinking is obviously not a strong suit.
You've proven that several times, yes.
QuoteQuoteWell, by all means provide your proof, then.
You have provided your own proof often enough. No need for me to dig it up.
Really? I've posted about being under arms and carrying out a military mission? Sorry, going to have to provide the proof of that - or admit the lie, one or the other.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
SkyDekker 1,465
QuoteYou've proven that several times, yes.
I know what I am, but what are you? Really, that's the best you got?
Quotealligator mouths and hummingbird asses
Oh a little underhanded threat of physical violence. How becoming of a mercenary. Like I said, you have provided your own proof often enough. Not a surprise you continue to do so

QuoteYeah, let's investigate Nugent and completely ignore the New Black Panther Party for putting out $10,000 bounties on American citizens. Gotta have priorities.
The Secret Service doesn't have that within their charter. But when someone says Obama is a coyote that needs to be shot...of course they're going to pay a visit.
The FBI would be the appropriate people to be talking with the NBP.
mnealtx 0
QuoteQuoteYou've proven that several times, yes.
I know what I am, but what are you? Really, that's the best you got?
I know...I over-delivered. The statement wasn't even worth *that* much.
QuoteQuotealligator mouths and hummingbird asses
Oh a little underhanded threat of physical violence.
??? A reference to making statements that you can't back up is an 'underhanded threat of physical violence'? Guess it's unsurprising, seeing as how you've continually (and deliberately) misunderstood or mis-stated so many *other* things in the thread.
QuoteHow becoming of a mercenary. Like I said, you have provided your own proof often enough. Not a surprise you continue to do so
That would be all the proof that you CAN'T provide references to, yes? I mean, if I've done it *SO* many times, it would be quite easy for you to provide a post or two and completely destroy my argument, right?
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
mnealtx 0
QuoteBut when someone says Obama is a coyote that needs to be shot...of course they're going to pay a visit.
Hadn't seen mention of that in the couple clips I've seen on AFN or read about - did he specifically say that Obama was a coyote that needs to be shot, or did he make an analogy?
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
QuoteQuoteBut when someone says Obama is a coyote that needs to be shot...of course they're going to pay a visit.
Hadn't seen mention of that in the couple clips I've seen on AFN or read about - did he specifically say that Obama was a coyote that needs to be shot, or did he make an analogy?
"But Nugent, speaking to the National Rifle Association in St. Louis last week, compared Obama and his team to “coyotes” that need to be shot and urged gun lovers to “chop (Democrats’) heads off” come fall. "
The SS is not knowing for being strictly literal. Any reference to the President and "shot" or "chop heads off" in the same ballpark is going to get a strident response, esp right after they got embarrassed by a demonstration of poor work ethic in Columbia.
mnealtx 0
QuoteQuoteQuoteBut when someone says Obama is a coyote that needs to be shot...of course they're going to pay a visit.
Hadn't seen mention of that in the couple clips I've seen on AFN or read about - did he specifically say that Obama was a coyote that needs to be shot, or did he make an analogy?
"But Nugent, speaking to the National Rifle Association in St. Louis last week, compared Obama and his team to “coyotes” that need to be shot and urged gun lovers to “chop (Democrats’) heads off” come fall. "
The SS is not knowing for being strictly literal. Any reference to the President and "shot" or "chop heads off" in the same ballpark is going to get a strident response, esp right after they got embarrassed by a demonstration of poor work ethic in Columbia.
Ok, so it was an analogy. Thanks for clearing that up.
But regarding response to purported threats, I wonder how many of these folks got investigated and why it wasn't all over the news?
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
Quote
But regarding response to purported threats, I wonder how many of these folks got investigated and why it wasn't all over the news?
Beats me? Some of them?
But if you're trying to convince yourself that the SS takes threats, real or idle, to Republican Presidents less seriously than they do against those to Democrats, guess again.
mnealtx 0
QuoteQuote
But regarding response to purported threats, I wonder how many of these folks got investigated and why it wasn't all over the news?
Beats me? Some of them?
But if you're trying to convince yourself that the SS takes threats, real or idle, to Republican Presidents less seriously than they do against those to Democrats, guess again.
I was speaking to the media coverage rather than the investigations themselves.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
QuoteTed, Ted, Ted, Ted....
You have now become the equal of the likes of Bahhhbra Streisand, Alec Baldwin, Eddie Vedder, Robert Altman, Cher and Pierre Salinger, all of whom claimed they would move from the US if Dubya won. Only Salinger actually followed through
Johnny Depp too.
Matt
So, start being safe, first!!!
Quote
I was speaking to the media coverage rather than the investigations themselves.
Ok - so did Bono ever threaten President Bush? Any other left leaning rockstar?
mnealtx 0
QuoteQuote
I was speaking to the media coverage rather than the investigations themselves.
Ok - so did Bono ever threaten President Bush? Any other left leaning rockstar?
Don't recall mention of it in the news - sorta like the signs never got mentioned, come to think of it.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
QuoteQuoteQuote
I was speaking to the media coverage rather than the investigations themselves.
Ok - so did Bono ever threaten President Bush? Any other left leaning rockstar?
Don't recall mention of it in the news - sorta like the signs never got mentioned, come to think of it.
or they didn't happen. People have signs advocating bad things happening to Obama all the time too, but I haven't heard about the SS going after them either.
Absence of evidence does not lead to a conclusion.
mnealtx 0
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote
I was speaking to the media coverage rather than the investigations themselves.
Ok - so did Bono ever threaten President Bush? Any other left leaning rockstar?
Don't recall mention of it in the news - sorta like the signs never got mentioned, come to think of it.
or they didn't happen.
So the signs and floats and stuff on the page I linked are all photoshopped? Is that the claim? Or are you agreeing with me that the media somehow managed to overlook them?
QuotePeople have signs advocating bad things happening to Obama all the time too, but I haven't heard about the SS going after them either.
Like people with Obama=Hitler LaRouche signs that got mentioned as Tea Party members in the reporting? Or the 'white guys with guns at townhall meetings' that turned out to be a black man?
QuoteAbsence of evidence does not lead to a conclusion.
Denial of evidence certainly doesn't, either.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
We got one slightly (to greatly) nuts rocker mouthing off about the current President who received SS attention for it.
We have no record of a celebrity doing the same for Bush, so we can't conclude that the SS or the media play favorites.
You posted pics of protesters during the Bush reign that showed similarly hostile posters that either did not get SS attention, or it just wasn't reported by the media.
And we have plenty of the same going on now that also have not garnered much attention by either.
You're trying to suggest that Nugnent got biased treatment by both, but you haven't laid down a foundation for the argument.
So, just WHERE did I say the SS was trying to cover anything up?
*Again* with the 'mercenary' bullshit? Didn't you embarrass yourself enough the *last* time you tried that?
You and jclalor have a lock on that already.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites