rushmc 23 #26 April 10, 2012 QuoteQuote Lawyers disagree with you here Badge of Honor. Good I will remember that the next time you ask someone if they are a climate scientist"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #27 April 10, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuote Lawyers disagree with you here Badge of Honor. Good I will remember that the next time you ask someone if they are a climate scientist Climate scientists are lawyers?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #28 April 10, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Lawyers disagree with you here Badge of Honor. Good I will remember that the next time you ask someone if they are a climate scientist Climate scientists are lawyers? Having trouble keeping up again I see"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #29 April 10, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Lawyers disagree with you here Badge of Honor. Good I will remember that the next time you ask someone if they are a climate scientist Climate scientists are lawyers? Having trouble keeping up again I see You wish.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #30 April 10, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Lawyers disagree with you here Badge of Honor. Good I will remember that the next time you ask someone if they are a climate scientist Climate scientists are lawyers? Having trouble keeping up again I see You wish. I can employ the KISS method when posting to you if you wish"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Southern_Man 0 #31 April 10, 2012 Colonial Virginia required their farmers to plant a certain percentage of their land in marijuana. George Washington and Thomas Jefferson used slave labor to grow it on their plantations. Proof that the outlawing of marijuana is against the original intent."What if there were no hypothetical questions?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #32 April 10, 2012 QuoteQuote Lawyers disagree with you here Badge of Honor. Finally you agree with me. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #33 April 10, 2012 QuoteQuote Lawyers disagree with you here Badge of Honor. SC justices, by and large, are lawyers. And you've frequently stated that SC decisions are in fact the truth. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #34 April 10, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuote Lawyers disagree with you here Badge of Honor. SC justices, by and large, are lawyers. And you've frequently stated that SC decisions are in fact the truth. Bill Clinton's a lawyer too, and I agree with him. Rushmc's comment was simply "an appeal to authority". Well, 2 can play that game.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #35 April 11, 2012 Well, 2 can play that game. Which is what I did Now you are back tracking "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #36 April 11, 2012 Quote Well, 2 can play that game. Which is what I did Now you are back tracking Sometimes I wonder if English is your first language.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #37 April 11, 2012 Quote Quote Well, 2 can play that game. Which is what I did Now you are back tracking Sometimes I wonder if English is your first language. and I wonder if you have an honest bone in your body (intellectually speaking) But it is fun throwing your shit back at you"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #38 April 11, 2012 QuoteSo if it's OK for guns and ammo, why not for health insurance? 1. This is not a commerce clause issue. 2. Where is the penalty for not following? In the end, I'd bet you would fight tooth and nail against them actually mandating each person buy a gun. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #39 April 11, 2012 QuoteQuoteSo if it's OK for guns and ammo, why not for health insurance? 1. This is not a commerce clause issue. 2. Where is the penalty for not following? In the end, I'd bet you would fight tooth and nail against them actually mandating each person buy a gun. Irrelevant on both points.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #40 April 11, 2012 QuoteIrrelevant on both points No, in fact the SC seems to agree with me that if you are going to try and use the commerce clause in a new way that you have better have some good justification. And the lack of penalty is pretty important since you can just ignore it otherwise. But I don't expect you to engage in an honest debate anymore anyway. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #41 April 11, 2012 QuoteQuoteIrrelevant on both points No, in fact the SC seems to agree with me that if you are going to try and use the commerce clause in a new way that you have better have some good justification. . WRONG. We don't yet know what the SC will say. So far only 9 people know that, and even then, one or more may change their minds.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #42 April 11, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Lawyers disagree with you here Badge of Honor. Good I will remember that the next time you ask someone if they are a climate scientist Maybe I'll ask them if they are a "top astronaut" instead... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #43 April 11, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteIrrelevant on both points No, in fact the SC seems to agree with me that if you are going to try and use the commerce clause in a new way that you have better have some good justification. . WRONG. We don't yet know what the SC will say. So far only 9 people know that, and even then, one or more may change their minds. He didn't say that the *decision* would be in agreement with his view. In oral arguments, the Court *did* ask the government's attorney about justification, so it looks like he's correct in his statement.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #44 April 11, 2012 QuoteWRONG. We don't yet know what the SC will say. So far only 9 people know that, and even then, one or more may change their minds. I know what they said during oral arguments.... Go fishing for yet another strawman. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #45 April 11, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteIrrelevant on both points No, in fact the SC seems to agree with me that if you are going to try and use the commerce clause in a new way that you have better have some good justification. . WRONG. We don't yet know what the SC will say. So far only 9 people know that, and even then, one or more may change their minds. He didn't say that the *decision* would be in agreement with his view. In oral arguments, the Court *did* ask the government's attorney about justification, so it looks like he's correct in his statement. The justices *ask* lots of questions. Kennedy in particular has often ended up voting in a way opposite to the gist of the questions he asked.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
