CameraNewbie 0 #1 March 20, 2012 Click here to read the article What do protesters want? Dead cops! When do they want it? Every 2 weeks! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #2 March 20, 2012 The story you linked is about the fact that original reports have been removed. I'll reserve my opinion until actual facts come out. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #3 March 20, 2012 QuoteI'll reserve my opinion until actual facts come out Malia went to Mexico. The media reported it. The White House requested the reports be scrubbed for the children's safety. The media scrubbed the reports. God caused an earthquake in order to expose this devious coverup. The white House admitted to the coverup and reported that Malia is A-OK.Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #4 March 20, 2012 is the objection that there are SS involved? The First Family does get to take vacations and we certainly wouldn't want the kid grabbed by our enemies. Or that this story might be suppressed news? Could be something to this. Or that this money was spent in a foreign country rather than on American soil? Something here, though I think most of the expense is travel and personnel, which stay in America. Probably shouldn't be so insular anyway in travel. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #5 March 20, 2012 why not The Obama admin is improper use of taxpayer funds"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 334 #6 March 20, 2012 Pelosi "needing" a jet that get to/fr CA faster bothers me. This doesn't. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BIGUN 1,488 #7 March 20, 2012 <---------- Yawns.Nobody has time to listen; because they're desperately chasing the need of being heard. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,589 #8 March 20, 2012 I don't remember this kind of outrage over Bush daughter vacations. Where should I go to find what you wrote about those? Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,150 #9 March 20, 2012 I bet a bunch of teenagers really wanted 25 Secret Service agents accompanying them on Spring Break. Sure.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #10 March 21, 2012 Quote I bet a bunch of teenagers really wanted 25 Secret Service agents accompanying them on Spring Break. Sure. at 13, they might not care so much. But fast forward a few years when they want to score some booze and boys, like the Bush daughters, and it's a pain...unless the SS will buy for them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #11 March 21, 2012 QuotePelosi "needing" a jet that get to/fr CA faster bothers me. This doesn't. I found I'm happier when I let nothing bother me...especially politicians. Honestly, I don't know wtf you people are bitching about anymore. Stop relying on the government and take responsibility for yourselves...ride free.Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #12 March 21, 2012 Quote Quote Pelosi "needing" a jet that get to/fr CA faster bothers me. This doesn't. I found I'm happier when I let nothing bother me...especially politicians. Honestly, I don't know wtf you people are bitching about anymore. Stop relying on the government and take responsibility for yourselves...ride free. There ya' go! Too many people bitchin' about too much government involvement in their lives yet, they want the government to take care of them. Where's that good ol' American 'self-sufficient' attitude we used to have? Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #13 March 21, 2012 13 year olds don't decide the level of secret service protection protection needed, the secret service does . If a 13 year old girl wants to be like a typical 13 year old WTF Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #14 March 21, 2012 QuoteQuotewhy not The Obama admin is improper use of taxpayer funds There's an intelligent and well thought out response. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #15 March 21, 2012 I'm old enough to remember that neither Julie Nixon Eisenhower (Pres. Nixon's older daughter) nor her husband David Eisenhower (Ike's grandson) could attend their own college graduations due to security concerns. People need to leave Presidents' families the fuck alone when they're doing their best to live their lives. Here's why the agents are necessary: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00dt8NAWJmQ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airdvr 210 #16 March 21, 2012 I don't know any 13 yo going to Mexico on spring break.Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #17 March 21, 2012 QuoteI don't know any 13 yo going to Mexico on spring break. Many, many 13 year-olds, especially if their family has some money, travel some distance to nice places during their spring breaks. But they usually travel with their families. And they usually don't get their families' ability to fund those trips publicly stuck up their asses. Malia's situation is rather unique, though, given that her father is the sitting president. What kind of vacation could that group of kids possibly have with the President and/or First Lady tagging along? Give the kid a break. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shropshire 0 #18 March 21, 2012 QuoteI don't know any 13 yo going to Mexico on spring break. Hey meester... you wanna by a leetle gurl? (.)Y(.) Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #19 March 21, 2012 QuoteQuotewhy not The Obama admin is improper use of taxpayer funds But when the Bush Girls go to Argintina, No problemo. Have you ever thought that announcing the number of agents in her security detail is compromising a 13 year old's safety? http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=2672576 I never heard you bring up the fact that the Bush girls had (and may still have) extended SS protection from an executive order from Bush. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-4904706-503544.html Save your time on Bv's test, your a 6 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #20 March 21, 2012 QuoteSave your time on Bv's test, your a 6 Save your time on LR's test, you're an 8.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
funjumper101 15 #21 March 22, 2012 QuotePelosi "needing" a jet that get to/fr CA faster bothers me. This doesn't. Repeating lies does not make them true. Gingrich, Hastert, Pelosi and Boner, as speakers of the house, were/are third in line for POTUS, should the P and VP die. The House Seargent at arms makes the call as to what transportation is provided to the SOTH. The SOTH has no choice in the matter. The actual FACTS are available on many sites. Snopes has a good explanation at http://www.snopes.com/politics/pelosi/jet.asp Why do RWCs have such profound respect for honesty and truthfulness? (NOT!!!!) Maybe it is because they won't let trivial details like documented facts get in the way of LIES that support their twisted versions of reality. Or maybe they are just plain venal and stupid. That brings up a very worthwhile quote from Robert Hanlon - "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #22 March 22, 2012 QuoteWhy do RWCs have such profound respect for honesty and truthfulness? (NOT!!!!) Perhaps your indignation has something to do with your inability to comprehend? From the Snopes article you posted, Pelosi herself says she wants a plane that can travell to California without having to stop for re-fueling. While the main reason was for security, you cannot deny that the plane would get her there more quickly if it didn't have to stop. That's all the OP said, you made the rest up in your own head. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
funjumper101 15 #23 March 22, 2012 QuoteQuoteWhy do RWCs have such profound respect for honesty and truthfulness? (NOT!!!!) Perhaps your indignation has something to do with your inability to comprehend? From the Snopes article you posted, Pelosi herself says she wants a plane that can travell to California without having to stop for re-fueling. While the main reason was for security, you cannot deny that the plane would get her there more quickly if it didn't have to stop. That's all the OP said, you made the rest up in your own head. Grasping at straws does not constitute a factual rebuttal. The security concerns raised by Ms Pelosi are quite legit, in spite of what Faux Spews, et al, had to say on the matter. Inquiries are not orders, in spite of what was spread through the bullshit info sources RWCs rely upon. The SOH has to be able to take over the government in a timely manner, in the event of the P and VP dying. The most risky part of any flight are in the vicinity of airports. Avoiding intermediate stops is good for both safety and security. Intelligent, well informed people know these facts. Dumbfuck RWCs, not so much. RWCs are perfectly happy to stay ignorant, and keep repeating things thjat are demonstrably FALSE!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #24 March 22, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteWhy do RWCs have such profound respect for honesty and truthfulness? (NOT!!!!) Perhaps your indignation has something to do with your inability to comprehend? From the Snopes article you posted, Pelosi herself says she wants a plane that can travell to California without having to stop for re-fueling. While the main reason was for security, you cannot deny that the plane would get her there more quickly if it didn't have to stop. That's all the OP said, you made the rest up in your own head. Grasping at straws does not constitute a factual rebuttal. The security concerns raised by Ms Pelosi are quite legit, in spite of what Faux Spews, et al, had to say on the matter. Inquiries are not orders, in spite of what was spread through the bullshit info sources RWCs rely upon. The SOH has to be able to take over the government in a timely manner, in the event of the P and VP dying. The most risky part of any flight are in the vicinity of airports. Avoiding intermediate stops is good for both safety and security. Intelligent, well informed people know these facts. Dumbfuck RWCs, not so much. RWCs are perfectly happy to stay ignorant, and keep repeating things thjat are demonstrably FALSE!! So in other words, you agree that she needed a plane that could get her from California to DC as quickly as possible. Got it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #25 March 22, 2012 Quote So in other words, you agree that she needed a plane that could get her from California to DC as quickly as possible. Got it. shouldn't the Speaker of the House spend more time doing work, less time flying? She's not the VP for christ's sake. There is work to be done. Otherwise we can expect more bills that no one gets to read first. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites