jakee 1,611 #26 March 12, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI think what was the reason for the post was to point out that voter fraud did happen and that fraud helped the dem's. No, it was to point out that some felons voted and to assume that helped the dems. Franken won by 312 votes. Use your toes if necessary. Ok. First, though, you'll need to tell me how many felons voted democrat. I'll wait. Try reading the article again. It says felons "likely" gave Franken the victory. So, what exactly did you want me to count, then? sounds awfully like you're agreeing with me that they're not pointing out that voter fraud helped the dems, but they're assuming it did.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #27 March 12, 2012 QuoteI have no issue with any and all Citizens being able to vote, even convicted felons on death row. That's a fine policy argument. But let's look at the rules in place. Operate by the rules in place and if they suck then change them for the next election. But saying that felons should have been allowed to vote is a different thing altogether. QuoteLook at all the trouble it would rid the process of.... Of course. Let voting be a free for all. The comment has a nice tie-in to your comments on the voter ID card issue. If the issue was "should felons be allowed to vote" then your position would be relevant. They don't. That being the case, what should be done to enforce these rules? My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #28 March 12, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI think what was the reason for the post was to point out that voter fraud did happen and that fraud helped the dem's. No, it was to point out that some felons voted and to assume that helped the dems. Franken won by 312 votes. Use your toes if necessary. Ok. First, though, you'll need to tell me how many felons voted democrat. I'll wait. Try reading the article again. It says felons "likely" gave Franken the victory. So, what exactly did you want me to count, then? sounds awfully like you're agreeing with me that they're not pointing out that voter fraud helped the dems, but they're assuming it did. Try re-reading the entire article. I'm agreeing that it's likely felons gave Franken the win. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #29 March 12, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI think what was the reason for the post was to point out that voter fraud did happen and that fraud helped the dem's. No, it was to point out that some felons voted and to assume that helped the dems. Franken won by 312 votes. Use your toes if necessary. Ok. First, though, you'll need to tell me how many felons voted democrat. I'll wait. Try reading the article again. It says felons "likely" gave Franken the victory. So, what exactly did you want me to count, then? sounds awfully like you're agreeing with me that they're not pointing out that voter fraud helped the dems, but they're assuming it did. Try re-reading the entire article. I'm agreeing that it's likely felons gave Franken the win. Ha! Dope dealers are small businessmen and we know which way they vote.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #30 March 12, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI think what was the reason for the post was to point out that voter fraud did happen and that fraud helped the dem's. No, it was to point out that some felons voted and to assume that helped the dems. Franken won by 312 votes. Use your toes if necessary. Ok. First, though, you'll need to tell me how many felons voted democrat. I'll wait. Try reading the article again. It says felons "likely" gave Franken the victory. So, what exactly did you want me to count, then? sounds awfully like you're agreeing with me that they're not pointing out that voter fraud helped the dems, but they're assuming it did. Try re-reading the entire article. I'm agreeing that it's likely felons gave Franken the win. Ha! Dope dealers are small businessmen and we know which way they vote. OK, I'll play...do you have something that indicates the % of convicted felons that voted who were drug dealers? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,611 #31 March 12, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI think what was the reason for the post was to point out that voter fraud did happen and that fraud helped the dem's. No, it was to point out that some felons voted and to assume that helped the dems. Franken won by 312 votes. Use your toes if necessary. Ok. First, though, you'll need to tell me how many felons voted democrat. I'll wait. Try reading the article again. It says felons "likely" gave Franken the victory. So, what exactly did you want me to count, then? sounds awfully like you're agreeing with me that they're not pointing out that voter fraud helped the dems, but they're assuming it did. Try re-reading the entire article. I'm agreeing that it's likely felons gave Franken the win. So, what exactly did you want me to count, then?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 3 #32 March 12, 2012 QuoteIt's funny to note the liberal responses to voter fraud by a Democrats here, and compare it to the other voter fraud case posted here recently (Republicans tough on voter fraud) in which voter fraud occured by a Republican. My oh my, what a difference a party affiliation makes. Just as I suspected. You're in full-on troll mode, there, John. Attaboy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
