kallend 2,148
rushmc 23
QuoteQuote
Apparently you consider ALL gun owners to be mentally ill. That being so, I can see why you would believe what you do. I don't happen to believe that.
Great
Then I look forward to the solutions you offer that back up your statement and are not a default gun ban
I won't waste my time answering that again. Use the "Search" function.
Again?
we are all still waiting for the first time
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
DaVinci 0
And in a related note.... The majority of guns owners (99.999999%) didn't shoot anyone yesterday.
kallend 2,148
QuoteAnd in a related note.... The majority of guns owners (99.999999%) didn't shoot anyone yesterday.
Source?
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
JohnRich 4
QuoteQuoteAnd in a related note.... The majority of guns owners (99.999999%) didn't shoot anyone yesterday.
Source?
I won't waste my time answering that again. Use the "Search" function.
kallend 2,148
QuoteQuoteQuoteAnd in a related note.... The majority of guns owners (99.999999%) didn't shoot anyone yesterday.
Source?
I won't waste my time answering that again. Use the "Search" function.
It's not true anyway.
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
rushmc 23
QuoteQuoteQuoteAnd in a related note.... The majority of guns owners (99.999999%) didn't shoot anyone yesterday.
Source?
I won't waste my time answering that again. Use the "Search" function.
Dont lower yourself
![[:/]](/uploads/emoticons/dry.png "[:/]"){kind=small}
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
DaVinci 0
QuoteSource?
Sure, you cited one case of a nutter with a gun, yet 40% of Americans own guns (Joseph Carroll, Gallup Poll Assistant Editor)
And the U.S. has an estimated 283 million guns in civilian hands (Brady Center http://www.bradycampaign.org/facts/gunsinamerica)
So, I'll let you do the math if you like, but 283 Million guns/the one that this idiot used.
Or maybe try this math in 1994, 44 million Americans owned 192 million firearms.... Just totally ignoring the 4-5 million firearms sold each year on average and using this number
44,000,000 to 1.... Again, you can do the math if you really want.
Current numbers show between 77 million and 90 million gun owners in the United States.
But you will see that you are really crying wolf due to your fear of an object.
But please, use whatever valid numbers you want and show me what percentage of gun owners vs total gun owners are a problem
In 2010, a new high of 14.41 million NICS checks were carried out, and for the first five months of 2011, checks have been running at a rate about 10% higher than 2010, suggesting a total for 2011 in the order of nearly 16 million checks – nearly twice the rate of nine years earlier.
Go ahead.... Back up your claims for once.
And even if that number is as low as 99%.... You are still just crying wolf.
kallend 2,148
So being unable to back up your claim, you resort to trying to blind us with bullshit.
Your claim is provably false.
Your claim is provably false.
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
kallend 2,148
QuoteQuoteSource?
Sure, you cited one case of a nutter with a gun.
Wrong again.
Lots more than one.
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
mnealtx 0
QuoteQuoteQuoteSource?
Sure, you cited one case of a nutter with a gun.
Wrong again.
Lots more than one.
No evidence of psych eval consistent with GCA 68 barring, search not limited to yesterday ("99+% of gun owners didn't shoot anyone YESTERDAY) and no exclusion of multiple reports of the same incident in the search.
So, yes...you're wrong again.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
headoverheels 334
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteSource?
Sure, you cited one case of a nutter with a gun.
Wrong again.
Lots more than one.
No evidence of psych eval consistent with GCA 68 barring, search not limited to yesterday ("99+% of gun owners didn't shoot anyone YESTERDAY) and no exclusion of multiple reports of the same incident in the search.
So, yes...you're wrong again.
99+% yes, but he had a bit too many 9's in there, which would imply that less than two gun owners in the US shot someone yesterday. Pretty sure that is off by a factor of 150 or so.
Quote
99+% yes, but he had a bit too many 9's in there, which would imply that less than two gun owners in the US shot someone yesterday. Pretty sure that is off by a factor of 150 or so.
And I'm sure several of those are to be commended.
My reality and yours are quite different.
I think we're all Bozos on this bus.
Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239
I think we're all Bozos on this bus.
Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239
kallend 2,148
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteSource?
Sure, you cited one case of a nutter with a gun.
Wrong again.
Lots more than one.
No evidence of psych eval consistent with GCA 68 barring, search not limited to yesterday ("99+% of gun owners didn't shoot anyone YESTERDAY) and no exclusion of multiple reports of the same incident in the search.
So, yes...you're wrong again.
99+% yes, but he had a bit too many 9's in there, which would imply that less than two gun owners in the US shot someone yesterday. Pretty sure that is off by a factor of 150 or so.
Innumeracy is as dangerous for our society as illiteracy. The innumerate in this forum have declared themselves.
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
kallend 2,148
Looks like Ohio wins today's "nutter with gun" contest.
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
mnealtx 0
QuoteThe innumerate in this forum have declared themselves.
Like where you said a 1% fail rate was 'piss poor', you mean?
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
DaVinci 0
QuoteSo being unable to back up your claim, you resort to trying to blind us with bullshit.
Your claim is provably false.
Then prove it or admit you are wrong (like normal).
kallend 2,148
QuoteQuoteSo being unable to back up your claim, you resort to trying to blind us with bullshit.
Your claim is provably false.
Then prove it or admit you are wrong (like normal).
Headoverheels has already done it. Try reading instead of ranting.
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
DaVinci 0
QuoteInnumeracy is as dangerous for our society as illiteracy. The innumerate in this forum have declared themselves.
You have shown your inability to have a discussion once again..... You seem to think a failure rate of 1% is a big problem.
So, your fear of 1% shows your failure of innumeracy.
DaVinci 0
QuoteHeadoverheels has already done it. Try reading instead of ranting.
Got it, you are unable to back up your crap... Like normal
Great
Then I look forward to the solutions you offer that back up your statement and are not a default gun ban
I won't waste my time answering that again. Use the "Search" function.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.