0
quade

"Gingrich: Campaign worker's signature fraud cost slot on Virginia ballot" -- CNN

Recommended Posts

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/12/28/gingrich-campaign-workers-signature-fraud-cost-slot-on-virginia-ballot/
Like I said, happens to everyone.

I had predicted this outcome the second I saw his campaign offering up a bounty for gathering signatures.

Not for Newt's sake, but there needs to be a better way of just getting on the ballot that doesn't incentivize the worst in people.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NBC said, in a paraphrase of their interview with him, it was a staff "clerical error". Strange how they each see this differently.

Funny, to me, that the campaign then calls the system flawed, cause they got caught but the other two front runners made it on.

Matt
An Instructors first concern is student safety.
So, start being safe, first!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Happens to every one of the national candidates if you look deep enough.

The key is getting so many signatures the fraudulent ones don't matter.



Exactly. I've handled a number of election law cases over the years, enough to be quite familiar with the process. Practically every hotly-contested election, at every level (right down to dog-catcher), involves candidates' challenging the signatures on each other's nominating petitions. The key is to get about double the minimum number of sigs you need, so that when some inevitably get stricken on challenge (and some always do), you're still left with enough valid ones to stay on the ballot. Plus, there are a number of other administrative "I's" to dot and "T's" to cross - it's all there in black & white; you just have to be diligent - and they have to be done right; you can't screw it up, and election courts rarely give you a pass if you do. Really, it's just like any other kind of due diligence. If your organization's not up to that task, well... that's on you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

NBC said, in a paraphrase of their interview with him, it was a staff "clerical error". Strange how they each see this differently.

Funny, to me, that the campaign then calls the system flawed, cause they got caught but the other two front runners made it on.

Matt


Yup, blame the staff first, then the system. Leadership you can count on. Didn't most of his key staff quit a little while back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

NBC said, in a paraphrase of their interview with him, it was a staff "clerical error". Strange how they each see this differently.

Funny, to me, that the campaign then calls the system flawed, cause they got caught but the other two front runners made it on.

Matt


Yup, blame the staff first, then the system. Leadership you can count on. Didn't most of his key staff quit a little while back.



Could be, I dunno, I am not a Newt fan, didn't like him as the Speaker and not now as a Citizen, or Lobbiest.

Matt
An Instructors first concern is student safety.
So, start being safe, first!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>Wrong. XDIF only applies if you are comparing one President to another. Former
>Speaker of the House doesn't count.

Ah, I was unaware of the subtleties of the XDIF. And to think so many people here were doing it wrong . . .



Well, that's what I'm here for. Let me know if you need more help with these kinds of issues. :ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

The first ODIF on SC! Congratulations; I think you owe beer.


Wrong. XDIF only applies if you are comparing one President to another. Former Speaker of the House doesn't count.


so is this a prediction that Newt will not in fact be winning next year?



Bwahahah. The ONLY way Gingrich gets to run at all is on the Americas Elect ticket and there is not 1 chance in hell whoever ends up on that is wining against Obama. At best it's a spoiler for the Republicans.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

The first ODIF on SC! Congratulations; I think you owe beer.



Wrong. XDIF only applies if you are comparing one President to another. Former Speaker of the House doesn't count.



so is this a prediction that Newt will not in fact be winning next year?



This question should be for Billvon since he is the one who made the comparison.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

The first ODIF on SC! Congratulations; I think you owe beer.



Wrong. XDIF only applies if you are comparing one President to another. Former Speaker of the House doesn't count.



so is this a prediction that Newt will not in fact be winning next year?



This question should be for Billvon since he is the one who made the comparison.



sorry, no, it was you that declared him a former Speaker of the House, not a Presidential candidate who will go on to the White House like Obama. If we accepted your arbitrary restrictions on when XDIF can be used, then it's Bill who presupposed a victory, and you who guaranteed a loss.

My ruling on this matter is final.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>This question should be for Billvon since he is the one who made the comparison.

OK. Then my ruling is - yes, Gravitymaster did indeed predict that Newt has no chance to become President.



OK, be a radical. As long as you are willing to accept the long term consequences of going against tradition. You know you are really putting yourself out there on this one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

>This question should be for Billvon since he is the one who made the comparison.

OK. Then my ruling is - yes, Gravitymaster did indeed predict that Newt has no chance to become President.



OK, be a radical. As long as you are willing to accept the long term consequences of going against tradition. You know you are really putting yourself out there on this one.



What are you talking about?
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

>This question should be for Billvon since he is the one who made the comparison.

OK. Then my ruling is - yes, Gravitymaster did indeed predict that Newt has no chance to become President.



OK, be a radical. As long as you are willing to accept the long term consequences of going against tradition. You know you are really putting yourself out there on this one.



What are you talking about?



I'm sure you wouldn't understand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0