Newt: The million dollar "History Consultant"

[jclalor 12]

And he looked like he was coming up in the polls. This is why the vast majority of Americans hate Washington. Newt making almost $2,000,000 to be a "history" consultant.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gI5uxryHXGwRwnii7H0yQJCe3hcA?docId=b1fb32e70a144fd999eeb66df9b12e8e

At the same time he is making hundreds of thousands from Fanny and Freddie, he says this:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALVZ4c6Lz48

[lawrocket 3]

Yep. did you see the bonuses paid out by Fannie and Freddie? Under government control they are.

And people will, once again, blame the recipients of the bonuses instead of the government and its loose pockets.

My wife is hotter than your wife.

[rushmc 23]

Quote

And he looked like he was coming up in the polls. This is why the vast majority of Americans hate Washington. Newt making almost $2,000,000 to be a "history" consultant.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gI5uxryHXGwRwnii7H0yQJCe3hcA?docId=b1fb32e70a144fd999eeb66df9b12e8e

At the same time he is making hundreds of thousands from Fanny and Freddie, he says this:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALVZ4c6Lz48

yawn

Old news

Next

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[Gravitymaster 0]

Kravitz and Yost are nothing but hacks for the Democrats. Funny how they accuse gingrich of doing exactly what they are paid to do.

http://newsbusters.org/category/people/derek-kravitz

[Gravitymaster 0]

BTW your Youtube video was a speech Gingrich gave in 2010. He stopped working for Freddie Mac in 2008.

[jclalor 12]

Quote

Quote

BTW your Youtube video was a speech Gingrich gave in 2010. He stopped working for Freddie Mac in 2008.

Well that must be a coincidence that he bad mouths them once he's off their payroll.

[Gravitymaster 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

BTW your Youtube video was a speech Gingrich gave in 2010. He stopped working for Freddie Mac in 2008.

Well that must be a coincidence that he bad mouths them once he's off their payroll.

You don't know what advice he gave them while on their payroll. You also don't know what changes may have occured between 2008 and 2010. You are just buying in to the latest left-wing propoganda to attack whichever Republican is surging in the polls.

[jclalor 12]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

BTW your Youtube video was a speech Gingrich gave in 2010. He stopped working for Freddie Mac in 2008.

Well that must be a coincidence that he bad mouths them once he's off their payroll.

You don't know what advice he gave them while on their payroll. You also don't know what changes may have occured between 2008 and 2010. You are just buying in to the latest left-wing propoganda to attack whichever Republican is surging in the polls.

But they make it so easy. In reality the left does not want to attack them all, just the ones that stand the best chance of beating Obama.

I like Bachmann, she's wonderful, I hope she gets the nomination.

[Gravitymaster 0]

Still sniffing that Hopium. eh?

[billvon 3,132]

>You don't know what advice he gave them while on their payroll.

No, but the people he worked with did.

"Those familiar with Gingrich’s work don’t recall any warnings about the company’s business model—and that instead, his job was to rally support for Freddie Mac among Republicans in Washington."

But no problem; he was just for them before he was against them.

[hwt 0]

Newt predicted the housing crisis after it was too late.
http://ronpaulflix.com/2011/09/ron-pauls-1988-prophetic-warning-of-the-banking-crisis-and-the-american-power-structure/

check out this 1988 clip.
here is true genius.

[jclalor 12]

Quote

Quote

Still sniffing that Hopium. eh?

If the right was running McCain against Obama right now, Obama would be history. But the GOP reminds me of the circus, when the little car pulls up and more and more clowns keep getting out. That's the GOP right now. Bachmann then Paul and then Perry and Cain, and now Gingrich, it's a circus. The only one that knows his ass from a hole in the ground is Hutsmen and he's hovering in the low single digits, not to mention he still has the Mormon thing going on like Romney.

[winsor 236]

The only reason Newt is doing so well is that Spiro Agnew is unavailable.

[billvon 3,132]

>That's the GOP right now. Bachmann then Paul and then Perry and
>Cain, and now Gingrich, it's a circus.

Yep. RushMC recently quipped that Elmer Fudd could beat Obama at this point. But the GOP can't even find someone that qualified.

[rushmc 23]

Quote

>That's the GOP right now. Bachmann then Paul and then Perry and
>Cain, and now Gingrich, it's a circus.

Yep. RushMC recently quipped that Elmer Fudd could beat Obama at this point. But the GOP can't even find someone that qualified.

Hmm

So you are saying someone LESS qualified than Elmer can beat Obama right now.


You are starting to get it my friend.

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[Gravitymaster 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Still sniffing that Hopium. eh?

If the right was running McCain against Obama right now, Obama would be history. But the GOP reminds me of the circus, when the little car pulls up and more and more clowns keep getting out. That's the GOP right now. Bachmann then Paul and then Perry and Cain, and now Gingrich, it's a circus. The only one that knows his ass from a hole in the ground is Hutsmen and he's hovering in the low single digits, not to mention he still has the Mormon thing going on like Romney.

You mean like in 2004 when the Dems put up clowns like Howard Dean (the screamer), John Edwards(the adulterer), Westley Clark(the Golden Boy), Al Sharpton(the racist), Carol Mosely Brown(against welfare reform), John Kerry(did you know he was in Vietnam?), Bob Graham, Richard Gephardt, Dennis Kucinich(the Space Alien), Ralph Nader(the Socialist) and Joe Lieberman(who left the Dem party?

Pretty much describes a normal vetting process when the party out of power is challenging the one in power.

[billvon 3,132]

>So you are saying someone LESS qualified than Elmer can beat Obama
>right now.

Nope. I'm saying the GOP doesn't even have an Elmer Fudd they can field.

[rushmc 23]

Quote

>So you are saying someone LESS qualified than Elmer can beat Obama
>right now.

Nope. I'm saying the GOP doesn't even have an Elmer Fudd they can field.

And what makes your point here so fun is that the left has thought this about most R canidates (except McCain who is not a republican anywy) since I can remember

Dont agree with the left? You are labled stupid and dangerous

I guess we will see what happnes next Nov

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[billvon 3,132]

>And what makes your point here so fun is that the left has thought this
>about most R canidates (except McCain who is not a republican anywy)
>since I can remember . . .

Probably true. What seems unique this time is that even the right is going after them for their incompetence.

[rushmc 23]

What seems unique this time is that even the right is going after them for their incompetence.

[kallend 2,183]

Quote

Quote

>That's the GOP right now. Bachmann then Paul and then Perry and
>Cain, and now Gingrich, it's a circus.

Yep. RushMC recently quipped that Elmer Fudd could beat Obama at this point. But the GOP can't even find someone that qualified.

Hmm

So you are saying someone LESS qualified than Elmer can beat Obama right now.

I think it suggests that your reading comprehension is right up there with your grammar and spelling.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[rushmc 23]

Quote

Quote

Quote

>That's the GOP right now. Bachmann then Paul and then Perry and
>Cain, and now Gingrich, it's a circus.

Yep. RushMC recently quipped that Elmer Fudd could beat Obama at this point. But the GOP can't even find someone that qualified.

Hmm

So you are saying someone LESS qualified than Elmer can beat Obama right now.

I think it suggests that your reading comprehension is right up there with your grammar and spelling.

Hey

It is straight out of the billvon Twister 101 course

I am not a graduated but I have studied

Ill bet you are a graduate of that class, at least on paper

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[kallend 2,183]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

>That's the GOP right now. Bachmann then Paul and then Perry and
>Cain, and now Gingrich, it's a circus.

Yep. RushMC recently quipped that Elmer Fudd could beat Obama at this point. But the GOP can't even find someone that qualified.

Hmm

So you are saying someone LESS qualified than Elmer can beat Obama right now.

I think it suggests that your reading comprehension is right up there with your grammar and spelling.

Hey

It is straight out of the billvon Twister 101 course

I am not a graduated but I have studied

Ill bet you are a graduate of that class, at least on paper

Quod erat demonstrandum.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[rushmc 23]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

>That's the GOP right now. Bachmann then Paul and then Perry and
>Cain, and now Gingrich, it's a circus.

Yep. RushMC recently quipped that Elmer Fudd could beat Obama at this point. But the GOP can't even find someone that qualified.

Hmm

So you are saying someone LESS qualified than Elmer can beat Obama right now.

I think it suggests that your reading comprehension is right up there with your grammar and spelling.

Hey

It is straight out of the billvon Twister 101 course

I am not a graduated but I have studied

Ill bet you are a graduate of that class, at least on paper

Quod erat demonstrandum.

Why yes

You did

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[wmw999 2,602]

Rush, if the Republicans were to field a candidate who was not "picked by the elite" (whoever they are in the Republican party -- and were they the ones who picked Sarah Palin?), do you think he or she could be elected by the entire voting population? (i.e. independents, liberals, conservatives, Democrats, Republicans, socialists, fascists -- you get the picture).

Wendy P.

There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)