0
rushmc

Wall Street or the Government Caused the Housing Colapse?

Recommended Posts

Quote



why do you keep bringing race into things? who cares what color the people are? The bottom line is the lending qualifications were lowered for all and many people and banks took out loans they should not have qualified for to the detrement of the country.



Oh I don't know... perhaps its OMFG... the numerous blithering idiots of the conservative movement who blither on and on and on daily about the MINORITY LOANS that caused all of the housing issues we see today:S:S:S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


the error in your argument is cra caused ALL loan qualifications to be reduced so as to not discriminate. Time to start looking at the cause and effect of the lefts feel good policies.



My current mortgage is with a credit union that wouldn't talk to me unless I was making a 20% down payment with an 80% LTV.

They also required employment verification on company letter head for the preceding two years, two years of W2 and 1040 forms, a letter from our landlord confirming what our rent was and that we'd paid it on time for the last year, and my most recent pay stub before closing.

Doesn't seem reduced to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Did the government FORCE Countrywide to make you an offer like that?



How the eff would I know that? I do know it was MY CHOICE to borrow what I felt was an amount I could handle.

I am sure a lot of people were misled. Still others were encouraged to gamble on increasing real estate prices. Buyer Beware.

jon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


My current mortgage is with a credit union that wouldn't talk to me unless I was making a 20% down payment with an 80% LTV.



In 1980 I was sold a graduated payment/adjustable rate mortgage. For the first five years I was to pay a little more each year until the fifth year when the payments would stabilize for the remainder of the mortgage.

What I just couldn't get my brain around, being 24 yrs old, was "I'm gonna borrow X amount and pay for five years. After those payments I'm gonna owe more than I borrowed??"

The kicker was I had to put down 20% to get their "best rate" of 11.75%!!!!!

I took the gamble with some reservations. (It worked out fine for me thankfully.)

jon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>Is there a third option that reads "I don't give a fuck, as long as you get your fucking
>hands out of my wallet and let me earn a living"?

Sure there is. That option is called "Kuwait."



No Bill.. tht sounds far more like Somalia... Kuwait has that whole pesky royalty and pesky Sharia law stuff goin on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Is there a third option that reads "I don't give a fuck, as long as you get your fucking hands out of my wallet and let me earn a living"?



+1
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Is there a third option that reads "I don't give a fuck, as long as you get your fucking hands out of my wallet and let me earn a living"?



Those who don't give a fuck about the past are doomed to repeat it.

Or something like that.

- Dan G

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


Did the government FORCE Countrywide to make you an offer like that?



How the eff would I know that? I do know it was MY CHOICE to borrow what I felt was an amount I could handle.

I am sure a lot of people were misled. Still others were encouraged to gamble on increasing real estate prices. Buyer Beware.

jon



Indeed, but trying to blame govt. mandates for things the mortgage industry did to itself (and by extension, to all of us), aided and abetted by Wall St., is disingenuous. And that is exactly what rushmc and marks are trying to do.

Nothing the govt. did forced AIG execs to make the decisions leading to the biggest corporate loss in history, yet these same execs then wanted $multi million bonuses AFTER the taxpayers bailed them out.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote


Did the government FORCE Countrywide to make you an offer like that?



How the eff would I know that? I do know it was MY CHOICE to borrow what I felt was an amount I could handle.

I am sure a lot of people were misled. Still others were encouraged to gamble on increasing real estate prices. Buyer Beware.

jon



Indeed, but trying to blame govt. mandates for things the mortgage industry did to itself (and by extension, to all of us), aided and abetted by Wall St., is disingenuous. And that is exactly what rushmc and marks are trying to do.



Trying to claim that they 'did it all themselves' when the lowered underwriting standards forced by CRA set the stage is even MORE disingenuous.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Trying to claim that they 'did it themselves' when CRA forced lowered
>underwriting standards is even MORE disingenuous.

Exactly. That's like claiming that criminals are to blame for crime, when we all know it's the government's lax gun control laws that force such behavior.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>Trying to claim that they 'did it themselves' when CRA forced lowered
>underwriting standards is even MORE disingenuous.

Exactly. That's like claiming that criminals are to blame for crime, when we all know it's the government's lax gun control laws that force such behavior.



That would be the gist of his OTHER pet argument, yes.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote


Did the government FORCE Countrywide to make you an offer like that?



How the eff would I know that? I do know it was MY CHOICE to borrow what I felt was an amount I could handle.

I am sure a lot of people were misled. Still others were encouraged to gamble on increasing real estate prices. Buyer Beware.

jon



Indeed, but trying to blame govt. mandates for things the mortgage industry did to itself (and by extension, to all of us), aided and abetted by Wall St., is disingenuous. And that is exactly what rushmc and marks are trying to do.



Trying to claim that they 'did it all themselves' when the lowered underwriting standards forced by CRA set the stage is even MORE disingenuous.



The overwhelming majority of defaults were NOT subject to CRA rules.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote


Did the government FORCE Countrywide to make you an offer like that?



How the eff would I know that? I do know it was MY CHOICE to borrow what I felt was an amount I could handle.

I am sure a lot of people were misled. Still others were encouraged to gamble on increasing real estate prices. Buyer Beware.

jon



Indeed, but trying to blame govt. mandates for things the mortgage industry did to itself (and by extension, to all of us), aided and abetted by Wall St., is disingenuous. And that is exactly what rushmc and marks are trying to do.



Trying to claim that they 'did it all themselves' when the lowered underwriting standards forced by CRA set the stage is even MORE disingenuous.



The overwhelming majority of defaults were NOT subject to CRA rules.



That must be why Fannie Mae had a 26% deliquency rate for subprime mortgages vs 5% for the overall book for Q3 2009....thank goodness YOU know better!
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote


Did the government FORCE Countrywide to make you an offer like that?



How the eff would I know that? I do know it was MY CHOICE to borrow what I felt was an amount I could handle.

I am sure a lot of people were misled. Still others were encouraged to gamble on increasing real estate prices. Buyer Beware.

jon



Indeed, but trying to blame govt. mandates for things the mortgage industry did to itself (and by extension, to all of us), aided and abetted by Wall St., is disingenuous. And that is exactly what rushmc and marks are trying to do.



Trying to claim that they 'did it all themselves' when the lowered underwriting standards forced by CRA set the stage is even MORE disingenuous.



The overwhelming majority of defaults were NOT subject to CRA rules.



That must be why Fannie Mae had a 26% deliquency rate for subprime mortgages vs 5% for the overall book for Q3 2009....thank goodness YOU know better!



Avoiding the point again. Subprime != CRA

What % of CRA loans defaulted? LaSt time I asked YOU, you didn't answer.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Avoiding the point again. Subprime != CRA



Attempting to deflect, AGAIN? The GSE Act and CRA set the conditions for the subprime market to exist in the first place.

Quote

What % of CRA loans defaulted?



What % of NON CRA loans defaulted?
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Avoiding the point again. Subprime != CRA



Attempting to deflect, AGAIN? The GSE Act and CRA set the conditions for the subprime market to exist in the first place.

Quote

What % of CRA loans defaulted?



What % of NON CRA loans defaulted?



More than CRA loans, which have a lower default rate than subprimes.

You claim the govt. is responsible.
Which Act forced banks to invent subprime mortgages?
Which Act forced the financial industry to invent credit default swaps?
Which Act forced Moodys, S&P and Fitch's to issue AAA ratings to crap in exchange for big commissions?
Which act forced AIG to bet the house on the crap?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Avoiding the point again. Subprime != CRA



Attempting to deflect, AGAIN? The GSE Act and CRA set the conditions for the subprime market to exist in the first place.

Quote

What % of CRA loans defaulted?



What % of NON CRA loans defaulted?



More than CRA loans, which have a lower default rate than subprimes.

You claim the govt. is responsible.
Which Act forced banks to invent subprime mortgages?
Which Act forced the financial industry to invent credit default swaps?
Which Act forced Moodys, S&P and Fitch's to issue AAA ratings to crap in exchange for big commissions?
Which act forced AIG to bet the house on the crap?



The GSE Act and CRA set the conditions for the subprime market to exist in the first place.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Avoiding the point again. Subprime != CRA



Attempting to deflect, AGAIN? The GSE Act and CRA set the conditions for the subprime market to exist in the first place.

Quote

What % of CRA loans defaulted?



What % of NON CRA loans defaulted?



More than CRA loans, which have a lower default rate than subprimes.

You claim the govt. is responsible.
Which Act forced banks to invent subprime mortgages?
Which Act forced the financial industry to invent credit default swaps?
Which Act forced Moodys, S&P and Fitch's to issue AAA ratings to crap in exchange for big commissions?
Which act forced AIG to bet the house on the crap?



The GSE Act and CRA set the conditions for the subprime market to exist in the first place.



And your masters of TRICKLE down were off and running

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No answer, just your usual diversionary tactic and weaseling garbage.

NO act of the government forced any of the items I listed. DEREGULATION allowed greed to run riot.

Which act forced banks into leveraging their loans at over 30:1?

Which act forced AIG to issue billions in CDSs without setting aside anything to cover the risk?

The CEO of Lehman Bros walked off with nearly $1/2 BILLION while screwing his business and taxpayers.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0