nigel99 574 #1 October 28, 2011 I think the whole SC environment is getting a bit to centred on religion at the moment. The gun and politics threads have currently taken a back seat. So should politicians be allowed to own/carry fire-arms?Experienced jumper - someone who has made mistakes more often than I have and lived. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rookie120 0 #2 October 28, 2011 Quote So should politicians be allowed to own/carry fire-arms? Why just politicians? Why should they be allowed to do something for protection but not me? What gets me now is in my home state of MI I had my CCP, am able to carry in a number of other states, former Army Infantry, been to countless NRA and other shooting classes and competition, never had anything more than a speeding ticket about 10 years ago but now here in the state of New Jersey I cannot do anything with a handgun. Sure am glad all the gangbangers still have their guns strapped on them. Ok rant over. If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #3 October 28, 2011 Quote I think the whole SC environment is getting a bit to centred on religion at the moment. The gun and politics threads have currently taken a back seat. So should politicians be allowed to own/carry fire-arms? dueling pistols only"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nigel99 574 #4 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote So should politicians be allowed to own/carry fire-arms? Why just politicians? Why should they be allowed to do something for protection but not me? What gets me now is in my home state of MI I had my CCP, am able to carry in a number of other states, former Army Infantry, been to countless NRA and other shooting classes and competition, never had anything more than a speeding ticket about 10 years ago but now here in the state of New Jersey I cannot do anything with a handgun. Sure am glad all the gangbangers still have their guns strapped on them. Ok rant over. Actually I was thinking the other way around. Democrats would probably use them to rob the rich Robin Hood style, and republicans can't be trusted not to shoot each other (Dick Cheney, being the role model for this one)Experienced jumper - someone who has made mistakes more often than I have and lived. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #5 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote I think the whole SC environment is getting a bit to centred on religion at the moment. The gun and politics threads have currently taken a back seat. So should politicians be allowed to own/carry fire-arms? dueling pistols only There ya' go! Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #6 October 28, 2011 Quote (Dick Cheney, being the role model for this one) Cut Dick some slack... it was a Lawyer he shot.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,112 #7 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote (Dick Cheney, being the role model for this one) Cut Dick some slack... it was a Lawyer he shot. Was said lawyer from the desert?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #8 October 28, 2011 maybe not enough caffeine this morning... I missed that reference. edit: caffeinated now... ha ha. I get it.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BoogeyMan 0 #9 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote I think the whole SC environment is getting a bit to centred on religion at the moment. The gun and politics threads have currently taken a back seat. So should politicians be allowed to own/carry fire-arms? dueling pistols only Dueling pistols for pols..? I was thinking more in the line of belt fed, for them. There's only one shot with duelers. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #10 October 29, 2011 Quote I think the whole SC environment is getting a bit to centred on religion at the moment. The gun and politics threads have currently taken a back seat. So should politicians be allowed to own/carry fire-arms? Here in Wisconsin, concealed carry is about to go into effect (Nov 1). The politicians have an interesting take on it. For the Assembly, carry will not be banned. That means carry will be allowed on the floor, in the gallery, in committee hearings. In the Senate, however, it will be banned in the gallery, but not on the floor. So the overlords and their minions will be allowed to be armed, but not their subjects watching. http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/rules-being-developed-would-allow-guns-in-assembly-not-senate-132709403.html"There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DesertAttorney 0 #11 October 29, 2011 Quote Quote Quote (Dick Cheney, being the role model for this one) Cut Dick some slack... it was a Lawyer he shot. Was said lawyer from the desert? Get stuffed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dks13827 3 #12 October 29, 2011 Some of the D.C. pols seem to carry anyway, regardless of breaking the laws they supported. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
