mnealtx 0 #76 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rookie120 0 #77 October 28, 2011 Quote I have previously suggested (And you can do a search if really interested) Well fuck me I guess I didnt have time to look over your 40,000 post to find it. A simple answer without the arrogant attitude would have been nice for once.If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #78 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote I have previously suggested (And you can do a search if really interested) Well fuck me I guess I didnt have time to look over your 40,000 post to find it. A simple answer without the arrogant attitude would have been nice for once. I did tell you. I support a return to 1999 tax rates combined with cuts in govt. spending. Not one OR the other, but both.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #79 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #80 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rookie120 0 #81 October 28, 2011 QuoteI did tell you. I support a return to 1999 tax rates combined with cuts in govt. spending. Not one OR the other, but both. How about cut spending to 1999 levels also? I'll go with that also!If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #82 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #83 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteI did tell you. I support a return to 1999 tax rates combined with cuts in govt. spending. Not one OR the other, but both. How about cut spending to 1999 levels also? I'll go with that also! I'd cut the defense budget more than that.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #84 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #85 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #86 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame. Yeah, your misdirection attempts usually are.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites CanuckInUSA 0 #87 October 28, 2011 Professor you do realize there is a difference between debt and deficit don't you? Kudos to Clinton for running small surpluses at the end of his 8 years (for this he needs to be given some credit). But America has been in massive debt for decades now. Investment capital was too loose during the DOT.COM years (end of the Clinton's term) and a lot of poor decisions were made by the private and public sectors. The financial storm we are experiencing now should have happened 8-10 years ago (the DOT.COM bubble did burst before Clinton left office) but GWB artificially delayed things with his policies. Government spending got a lot worse under GWB and now Obama is on track to not only go down as the biggest spending president, but one who added more debt than all previous presidents combined. You can go on all you want about how taxes should be raised but that still does not change the fact that GWB and Obama have raised government spending to the point where it is unsustainable. Go back to the 1999 spending and America's debt is still in a shit sandwich. But at least the 1999 sandwich is not as foul as the sandwich we have now thanks to GWB and Obama. I am all for trying to get businesses to bring back jobs to Europe and North America. Without jobs for the masses, we are all doomed. But raising taxes is not how jobs will be created. We need to re-educate the young to think of "How do I become a self reliant entrepreneurial member of society". Parents need to be the number one delivery of this message and then the educators can help deliver this message. But how do you teach young people to be good parents when they themselves had shitty parents. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rookie120 0 #88 October 28, 2011 I'd cut the defense budget more than that. *** A lot of people say that. What specificly in defense would you cut?If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #89 October 28, 2011 QuoteProfessor you do realize there is a difference between debt and deficit don't you? Yes, as a matter of fact I do. Have I written anything to suggest that I don't know the difference? Fortunately, in my life, I run neither by ensuring that my revenues exceed my expenditures both annually and overall, while unfortunately the country has both a large deficit and a large debt. I don't see the country getting out of its problems by raising taxes on the poor and lowering them on the rich, as Cain and Perry propose and most of the GOP supports, or by continuing to spend as much on "defense" as the rest of the world combined..... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #90 October 28, 2011 QuoteI'd cut the defense budget more than that. *** A lot of people say that. What specificly in defense would you cut? First off , EVERY system that the Pentagon says it doesn't need or want but which has been forced upon it by Congress.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #91 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame. Yeah, your misdirection attempts usually are. So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #92 October 28, 2011 Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #93 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine. Lame. The only person you fool is yourself.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #94 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine. Lame. The only person you fool is yourself. Yes, that's why we laugh at your misdirection attempts....like this one.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Butters 0 #95 October 28, 2011 QuotePS fascinating that you think Jerry Bird "doesn't know much about skydiving". Kind of puts your opinions in perspective. There you go again making false statements ... you really are an arrogant, childish, insipid troll who appears to be growing in bitterness while shrinking in cognitive abilities."That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #96 October 29, 2011 QuoteQuotePS fascinating that you think Jerry Bird "doesn't know much about skydiving". Kind of puts your opinions in perspective. There you go again making false statements ... you really are an arrogant, childish, insipid troll who appears to be growing in bitterness while shrinking in cognitive abilities. You wrote it.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Page 4 of 4 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing × Sign In Sign Up Forums Dropzones Classifieds Gear Indoor Articles Photos Videos Calendar Stolen Fatalities Subscriptions Leaderboard Activity Back Activity All Activity My Activity Streams Unread Content Content I Started
Rookie120 0 #77 October 28, 2011 Quote I have previously suggested (And you can do a search if really interested) Well fuck me I guess I didnt have time to look over your 40,000 post to find it. A simple answer without the arrogant attitude would have been nice for once.If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #78 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote I have previously suggested (And you can do a search if really interested) Well fuck me I guess I didnt have time to look over your 40,000 post to find it. A simple answer without the arrogant attitude would have been nice for once. I did tell you. I support a return to 1999 tax rates combined with cuts in govt. spending. Not one OR the other, but both.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #79 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #80 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rookie120 0 #81 October 28, 2011 QuoteI did tell you. I support a return to 1999 tax rates combined with cuts in govt. spending. Not one OR the other, but both. How about cut spending to 1999 levels also? I'll go with that also!If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #82 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #83 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteI did tell you. I support a return to 1999 tax rates combined with cuts in govt. spending. Not one OR the other, but both. How about cut spending to 1999 levels also? I'll go with that also! I'd cut the defense budget more than that.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #84 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #85 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #86 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame. Yeah, your misdirection attempts usually are.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites CanuckInUSA 0 #87 October 28, 2011 Professor you do realize there is a difference between debt and deficit don't you? Kudos to Clinton for running small surpluses at the end of his 8 years (for this he needs to be given some credit). But America has been in massive debt for decades now. Investment capital was too loose during the DOT.COM years (end of the Clinton's term) and a lot of poor decisions were made by the private and public sectors. The financial storm we are experiencing now should have happened 8-10 years ago (the DOT.COM bubble did burst before Clinton left office) but GWB artificially delayed things with his policies. Government spending got a lot worse under GWB and now Obama is on track to not only go down as the biggest spending president, but one who added more debt than all previous presidents combined. You can go on all you want about how taxes should be raised but that still does not change the fact that GWB and Obama have raised government spending to the point where it is unsustainable. Go back to the 1999 spending and America's debt is still in a shit sandwich. But at least the 1999 sandwich is not as foul as the sandwich we have now thanks to GWB and Obama. I am all for trying to get businesses to bring back jobs to Europe and North America. Without jobs for the masses, we are all doomed. But raising taxes is not how jobs will be created. We need to re-educate the young to think of "How do I become a self reliant entrepreneurial member of society". Parents need to be the number one delivery of this message and then the educators can help deliver this message. But how do you teach young people to be good parents when they themselves had shitty parents. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rookie120 0 #88 October 28, 2011 I'd cut the defense budget more than that. *** A lot of people say that. What specificly in defense would you cut?If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #89 October 28, 2011 QuoteProfessor you do realize there is a difference between debt and deficit don't you? Yes, as a matter of fact I do. Have I written anything to suggest that I don't know the difference? Fortunately, in my life, I run neither by ensuring that my revenues exceed my expenditures both annually and overall, while unfortunately the country has both a large deficit and a large debt. I don't see the country getting out of its problems by raising taxes on the poor and lowering them on the rich, as Cain and Perry propose and most of the GOP supports, or by continuing to spend as much on "defense" as the rest of the world combined..... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #90 October 28, 2011 QuoteI'd cut the defense budget more than that. *** A lot of people say that. What specificly in defense would you cut? First off , EVERY system that the Pentagon says it doesn't need or want but which has been forced upon it by Congress.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #91 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame. Yeah, your misdirection attempts usually are. So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #92 October 28, 2011 Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #93 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine. Lame. The only person you fool is yourself.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #94 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine. Lame. The only person you fool is yourself. Yes, that's why we laugh at your misdirection attempts....like this one.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Butters 0 #95 October 28, 2011 QuotePS fascinating that you think Jerry Bird "doesn't know much about skydiving". Kind of puts your opinions in perspective. There you go again making false statements ... you really are an arrogant, childish, insipid troll who appears to be growing in bitterness while shrinking in cognitive abilities."That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #96 October 29, 2011 QuoteQuotePS fascinating that you think Jerry Bird "doesn't know much about skydiving". Kind of puts your opinions in perspective. There you go again making false statements ... you really are an arrogant, childish, insipid troll who appears to be growing in bitterness while shrinking in cognitive abilities. You wrote it.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Page 4 of 4 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing × Sign In Sign Up Forums Dropzones Classifieds Gear Indoor Articles Photos Videos Calendar Stolen Fatalities Subscriptions Leaderboard Activity Back Activity All Activity My Activity Streams Unread Content Content I Started
mnealtx 0 #80 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rookie120 0 #81 October 28, 2011 QuoteI did tell you. I support a return to 1999 tax rates combined with cuts in govt. spending. Not one OR the other, but both. How about cut spending to 1999 levels also? I'll go with that also!If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #82 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #83 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteI did tell you. I support a return to 1999 tax rates combined with cuts in govt. spending. Not one OR the other, but both. How about cut spending to 1999 levels also? I'll go with that also! I'd cut the defense budget more than that.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #84 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #85 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #86 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame. Yeah, your misdirection attempts usually are.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites CanuckInUSA 0 #87 October 28, 2011 Professor you do realize there is a difference between debt and deficit don't you? Kudos to Clinton for running small surpluses at the end of his 8 years (for this he needs to be given some credit). But America has been in massive debt for decades now. Investment capital was too loose during the DOT.COM years (end of the Clinton's term) and a lot of poor decisions were made by the private and public sectors. The financial storm we are experiencing now should have happened 8-10 years ago (the DOT.COM bubble did burst before Clinton left office) but GWB artificially delayed things with his policies. Government spending got a lot worse under GWB and now Obama is on track to not only go down as the biggest spending president, but one who added more debt than all previous presidents combined. You can go on all you want about how taxes should be raised but that still does not change the fact that GWB and Obama have raised government spending to the point where it is unsustainable. Go back to the 1999 spending and America's debt is still in a shit sandwich. But at least the 1999 sandwich is not as foul as the sandwich we have now thanks to GWB and Obama. I am all for trying to get businesses to bring back jobs to Europe and North America. Without jobs for the masses, we are all doomed. But raising taxes is not how jobs will be created. We need to re-educate the young to think of "How do I become a self reliant entrepreneurial member of society". Parents need to be the number one delivery of this message and then the educators can help deliver this message. But how do you teach young people to be good parents when they themselves had shitty parents. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rookie120 0 #88 October 28, 2011 I'd cut the defense budget more than that. *** A lot of people say that. What specificly in defense would you cut?If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #89 October 28, 2011 QuoteProfessor you do realize there is a difference between debt and deficit don't you? Yes, as a matter of fact I do. Have I written anything to suggest that I don't know the difference? Fortunately, in my life, I run neither by ensuring that my revenues exceed my expenditures both annually and overall, while unfortunately the country has both a large deficit and a large debt. I don't see the country getting out of its problems by raising taxes on the poor and lowering them on the rich, as Cain and Perry propose and most of the GOP supports, or by continuing to spend as much on "defense" as the rest of the world combined..... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #90 October 28, 2011 QuoteI'd cut the defense budget more than that. *** A lot of people say that. What specificly in defense would you cut? First off , EVERY system that the Pentagon says it doesn't need or want but which has been forced upon it by Congress.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #91 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame. Yeah, your misdirection attempts usually are. So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #92 October 28, 2011 Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #93 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine. Lame. The only person you fool is yourself.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #94 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine. Lame. The only person you fool is yourself. Yes, that's why we laugh at your misdirection attempts....like this one.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Butters 0 #95 October 28, 2011 QuotePS fascinating that you think Jerry Bird "doesn't know much about skydiving". Kind of puts your opinions in perspective. There you go again making false statements ... you really are an arrogant, childish, insipid troll who appears to be growing in bitterness while shrinking in cognitive abilities."That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #96 October 29, 2011 QuoteQuotePS fascinating that you think Jerry Bird "doesn't know much about skydiving". Kind of puts your opinions in perspective. There you go again making false statements ... you really are an arrogant, childish, insipid troll who appears to be growing in bitterness while shrinking in cognitive abilities. You wrote it.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Page 4 of 4 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
Rookie120 0 #81 October 28, 2011 QuoteI did tell you. I support a return to 1999 tax rates combined with cuts in govt. spending. Not one OR the other, but both. How about cut spending to 1999 levels also? I'll go with that also!If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #82 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #83 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteI did tell you. I support a return to 1999 tax rates combined with cuts in govt. spending. Not one OR the other, but both. How about cut spending to 1999 levels also? I'll go with that also! I'd cut the defense budget more than that.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #84 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #85 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #86 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame. Yeah, your misdirection attempts usually are.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites CanuckInUSA 0 #87 October 28, 2011 Professor you do realize there is a difference between debt and deficit don't you? Kudos to Clinton for running small surpluses at the end of his 8 years (for this he needs to be given some credit). But America has been in massive debt for decades now. Investment capital was too loose during the DOT.COM years (end of the Clinton's term) and a lot of poor decisions were made by the private and public sectors. The financial storm we are experiencing now should have happened 8-10 years ago (the DOT.COM bubble did burst before Clinton left office) but GWB artificially delayed things with his policies. Government spending got a lot worse under GWB and now Obama is on track to not only go down as the biggest spending president, but one who added more debt than all previous presidents combined. You can go on all you want about how taxes should be raised but that still does not change the fact that GWB and Obama have raised government spending to the point where it is unsustainable. Go back to the 1999 spending and America's debt is still in a shit sandwich. But at least the 1999 sandwich is not as foul as the sandwich we have now thanks to GWB and Obama. I am all for trying to get businesses to bring back jobs to Europe and North America. Without jobs for the masses, we are all doomed. But raising taxes is not how jobs will be created. We need to re-educate the young to think of "How do I become a self reliant entrepreneurial member of society". Parents need to be the number one delivery of this message and then the educators can help deliver this message. But how do you teach young people to be good parents when they themselves had shitty parents. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rookie120 0 #88 October 28, 2011 I'd cut the defense budget more than that. *** A lot of people say that. What specificly in defense would you cut?If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #89 October 28, 2011 QuoteProfessor you do realize there is a difference between debt and deficit don't you? Yes, as a matter of fact I do. Have I written anything to suggest that I don't know the difference? Fortunately, in my life, I run neither by ensuring that my revenues exceed my expenditures both annually and overall, while unfortunately the country has both a large deficit and a large debt. I don't see the country getting out of its problems by raising taxes on the poor and lowering them on the rich, as Cain and Perry propose and most of the GOP supports, or by continuing to spend as much on "defense" as the rest of the world combined..... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #90 October 28, 2011 QuoteI'd cut the defense budget more than that. *** A lot of people say that. What specificly in defense would you cut? First off , EVERY system that the Pentagon says it doesn't need or want but which has been forced upon it by Congress.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #91 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame. Yeah, your misdirection attempts usually are. So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #92 October 28, 2011 Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #93 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine. Lame. The only person you fool is yourself.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #94 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine. Lame. The only person you fool is yourself. Yes, that's why we laugh at your misdirection attempts....like this one.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Butters 0 #95 October 28, 2011 QuotePS fascinating that you think Jerry Bird "doesn't know much about skydiving". Kind of puts your opinions in perspective. There you go again making false statements ... you really are an arrogant, childish, insipid troll who appears to be growing in bitterness while shrinking in cognitive abilities."That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #96 October 29, 2011 QuoteQuotePS fascinating that you think Jerry Bird "doesn't know much about skydiving". Kind of puts your opinions in perspective. There you go again making false statements ... you really are an arrogant, childish, insipid troll who appears to be growing in bitterness while shrinking in cognitive abilities. You wrote it.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Page 4 of 4 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
kallend 2,182 #83 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteI did tell you. I support a return to 1999 tax rates combined with cuts in govt. spending. Not one OR the other, but both. How about cut spending to 1999 levels also? I'll go with that also! I'd cut the defense budget more than that.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #84 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #85 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #86 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame. Yeah, your misdirection attempts usually are.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites CanuckInUSA 0 #87 October 28, 2011 Professor you do realize there is a difference between debt and deficit don't you? Kudos to Clinton for running small surpluses at the end of his 8 years (for this he needs to be given some credit). But America has been in massive debt for decades now. Investment capital was too loose during the DOT.COM years (end of the Clinton's term) and a lot of poor decisions were made by the private and public sectors. The financial storm we are experiencing now should have happened 8-10 years ago (the DOT.COM bubble did burst before Clinton left office) but GWB artificially delayed things with his policies. Government spending got a lot worse under GWB and now Obama is on track to not only go down as the biggest spending president, but one who added more debt than all previous presidents combined. You can go on all you want about how taxes should be raised but that still does not change the fact that GWB and Obama have raised government spending to the point where it is unsustainable. Go back to the 1999 spending and America's debt is still in a shit sandwich. But at least the 1999 sandwich is not as foul as the sandwich we have now thanks to GWB and Obama. I am all for trying to get businesses to bring back jobs to Europe and North America. Without jobs for the masses, we are all doomed. But raising taxes is not how jobs will be created. We need to re-educate the young to think of "How do I become a self reliant entrepreneurial member of society". Parents need to be the number one delivery of this message and then the educators can help deliver this message. But how do you teach young people to be good parents when they themselves had shitty parents. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rookie120 0 #88 October 28, 2011 I'd cut the defense budget more than that. *** A lot of people say that. What specificly in defense would you cut?If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #89 October 28, 2011 QuoteProfessor you do realize there is a difference between debt and deficit don't you? Yes, as a matter of fact I do. Have I written anything to suggest that I don't know the difference? Fortunately, in my life, I run neither by ensuring that my revenues exceed my expenditures both annually and overall, while unfortunately the country has both a large deficit and a large debt. I don't see the country getting out of its problems by raising taxes on the poor and lowering them on the rich, as Cain and Perry propose and most of the GOP supports, or by continuing to spend as much on "defense" as the rest of the world combined..... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #90 October 28, 2011 QuoteI'd cut the defense budget more than that. *** A lot of people say that. What specificly in defense would you cut? First off , EVERY system that the Pentagon says it doesn't need or want but which has been forced upon it by Congress.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #91 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame. Yeah, your misdirection attempts usually are. So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #92 October 28, 2011 Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #93 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine. Lame. The only person you fool is yourself.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #94 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine. Lame. The only person you fool is yourself. Yes, that's why we laugh at your misdirection attempts....like this one.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Butters 0 #95 October 28, 2011 QuotePS fascinating that you think Jerry Bird "doesn't know much about skydiving". Kind of puts your opinions in perspective. There you go again making false statements ... you really are an arrogant, childish, insipid troll who appears to be growing in bitterness while shrinking in cognitive abilities."That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #96 October 29, 2011 QuoteQuotePS fascinating that you think Jerry Bird "doesn't know much about skydiving". Kind of puts your opinions in perspective. There you go again making false statements ... you really are an arrogant, childish, insipid troll who appears to be growing in bitterness while shrinking in cognitive abilities. You wrote it.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Page 4 of 4 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
kallend 2,182 #85 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #86 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame. Yeah, your misdirection attempts usually are.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites CanuckInUSA 0 #87 October 28, 2011 Professor you do realize there is a difference between debt and deficit don't you? Kudos to Clinton for running small surpluses at the end of his 8 years (for this he needs to be given some credit). But America has been in massive debt for decades now. Investment capital was too loose during the DOT.COM years (end of the Clinton's term) and a lot of poor decisions were made by the private and public sectors. The financial storm we are experiencing now should have happened 8-10 years ago (the DOT.COM bubble did burst before Clinton left office) but GWB artificially delayed things with his policies. Government spending got a lot worse under GWB and now Obama is on track to not only go down as the biggest spending president, but one who added more debt than all previous presidents combined. You can go on all you want about how taxes should be raised but that still does not change the fact that GWB and Obama have raised government spending to the point where it is unsustainable. Go back to the 1999 spending and America's debt is still in a shit sandwich. But at least the 1999 sandwich is not as foul as the sandwich we have now thanks to GWB and Obama. I am all for trying to get businesses to bring back jobs to Europe and North America. Without jobs for the masses, we are all doomed. But raising taxes is not how jobs will be created. We need to re-educate the young to think of "How do I become a self reliant entrepreneurial member of society". Parents need to be the number one delivery of this message and then the educators can help deliver this message. But how do you teach young people to be good parents when they themselves had shitty parents. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rookie120 0 #88 October 28, 2011 I'd cut the defense budget more than that. *** A lot of people say that. What specificly in defense would you cut?If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #89 October 28, 2011 QuoteProfessor you do realize there is a difference between debt and deficit don't you? Yes, as a matter of fact I do. Have I written anything to suggest that I don't know the difference? Fortunately, in my life, I run neither by ensuring that my revenues exceed my expenditures both annually and overall, while unfortunately the country has both a large deficit and a large debt. I don't see the country getting out of its problems by raising taxes on the poor and lowering them on the rich, as Cain and Perry propose and most of the GOP supports, or by continuing to spend as much on "defense" as the rest of the world combined..... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #90 October 28, 2011 QuoteI'd cut the defense budget more than that. *** A lot of people say that. What specificly in defense would you cut? First off , EVERY system that the Pentagon says it doesn't need or want but which has been forced upon it by Congress.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #91 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame. Yeah, your misdirection attempts usually are. So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #92 October 28, 2011 Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #93 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine. Lame. The only person you fool is yourself.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #94 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine. Lame. The only person you fool is yourself. Yes, that's why we laugh at your misdirection attempts....like this one.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Butters 0 #95 October 28, 2011 QuotePS fascinating that you think Jerry Bird "doesn't know much about skydiving". Kind of puts your opinions in perspective. There you go again making false statements ... you really are an arrogant, childish, insipid troll who appears to be growing in bitterness while shrinking in cognitive abilities."That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #96 October 29, 2011 QuoteQuotePS fascinating that you think Jerry Bird "doesn't know much about skydiving". Kind of puts your opinions in perspective. There you go again making false statements ... you really are an arrogant, childish, insipid troll who appears to be growing in bitterness while shrinking in cognitive abilities. You wrote it.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Page 4 of 4 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
mnealtx 0 #86 October 28, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame. Yeah, your misdirection attempts usually are.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites CanuckInUSA 0 #87 October 28, 2011 Professor you do realize there is a difference between debt and deficit don't you? Kudos to Clinton for running small surpluses at the end of his 8 years (for this he needs to be given some credit). But America has been in massive debt for decades now. Investment capital was too loose during the DOT.COM years (end of the Clinton's term) and a lot of poor decisions were made by the private and public sectors. The financial storm we are experiencing now should have happened 8-10 years ago (the DOT.COM bubble did burst before Clinton left office) but GWB artificially delayed things with his policies. Government spending got a lot worse under GWB and now Obama is on track to not only go down as the biggest spending president, but one who added more debt than all previous presidents combined. You can go on all you want about how taxes should be raised but that still does not change the fact that GWB and Obama have raised government spending to the point where it is unsustainable. Go back to the 1999 spending and America's debt is still in a shit sandwich. But at least the 1999 sandwich is not as foul as the sandwich we have now thanks to GWB and Obama. I am all for trying to get businesses to bring back jobs to Europe and North America. Without jobs for the masses, we are all doomed. But raising taxes is not how jobs will be created. We need to re-educate the young to think of "How do I become a self reliant entrepreneurial member of society". Parents need to be the number one delivery of this message and then the educators can help deliver this message. But how do you teach young people to be good parents when they themselves had shitty parents. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Rookie120 0 #88 October 28, 2011 I'd cut the defense budget more than that. *** A lot of people say that. What specificly in defense would you cut?If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #89 October 28, 2011 QuoteProfessor you do realize there is a difference between debt and deficit don't you? Yes, as a matter of fact I do. Have I written anything to suggest that I don't know the difference? Fortunately, in my life, I run neither by ensuring that my revenues exceed my expenditures both annually and overall, while unfortunately the country has both a large deficit and a large debt. I don't see the country getting out of its problems by raising taxes on the poor and lowering them on the rich, as Cain and Perry propose and most of the GOP supports, or by continuing to spend as much on "defense" as the rest of the world combined..... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #90 October 28, 2011 QuoteI'd cut the defense budget more than that. *** A lot of people say that. What specificly in defense would you cut? First off , EVERY system that the Pentagon says it doesn't need or want but which has been forced upon it by Congress.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #91 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame. Yeah, your misdirection attempts usually are. So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #92 October 28, 2011 Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #93 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine. Lame. The only person you fool is yourself.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #94 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine. Lame. The only person you fool is yourself. Yes, that's why we laugh at your misdirection attempts....like this one.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Butters 0 #95 October 28, 2011 QuotePS fascinating that you think Jerry Bird "doesn't know much about skydiving". Kind of puts your opinions in perspective. There you go again making false statements ... you really are an arrogant, childish, insipid troll who appears to be growing in bitterness while shrinking in cognitive abilities."That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,182 #96 October 29, 2011 QuoteQuotePS fascinating that you think Jerry Bird "doesn't know much about skydiving". Kind of puts your opinions in perspective. There you go again making false statements ... you really are an arrogant, childish, insipid troll who appears to be growing in bitterness while shrinking in cognitive abilities. You wrote it.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Page 4 of 4 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
CanuckInUSA 0 #87 October 28, 2011 Professor you do realize there is a difference between debt and deficit don't you? Kudos to Clinton for running small surpluses at the end of his 8 years (for this he needs to be given some credit). But America has been in massive debt for decades now. Investment capital was too loose during the DOT.COM years (end of the Clinton's term) and a lot of poor decisions were made by the private and public sectors. The financial storm we are experiencing now should have happened 8-10 years ago (the DOT.COM bubble did burst before Clinton left office) but GWB artificially delayed things with his policies. Government spending got a lot worse under GWB and now Obama is on track to not only go down as the biggest spending president, but one who added more debt than all previous presidents combined. You can go on all you want about how taxes should be raised but that still does not change the fact that GWB and Obama have raised government spending to the point where it is unsustainable. Go back to the 1999 spending and America's debt is still in a shit sandwich. But at least the 1999 sandwich is not as foul as the sandwich we have now thanks to GWB and Obama. I am all for trying to get businesses to bring back jobs to Europe and North America. Without jobs for the masses, we are all doomed. But raising taxes is not how jobs will be created. We need to re-educate the young to think of "How do I become a self reliant entrepreneurial member of society". Parents need to be the number one delivery of this message and then the educators can help deliver this message. But how do you teach young people to be good parents when they themselves had shitty parents. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rookie120 0 #88 October 28, 2011 I'd cut the defense budget more than that. *** A lot of people say that. What specificly in defense would you cut?If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #89 October 28, 2011 QuoteProfessor you do realize there is a difference between debt and deficit don't you? Yes, as a matter of fact I do. Have I written anything to suggest that I don't know the difference? Fortunately, in my life, I run neither by ensuring that my revenues exceed my expenditures both annually and overall, while unfortunately the country has both a large deficit and a large debt. I don't see the country getting out of its problems by raising taxes on the poor and lowering them on the rich, as Cain and Perry propose and most of the GOP supports, or by continuing to spend as much on "defense" as the rest of the world combined..... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #90 October 28, 2011 QuoteI'd cut the defense budget more than that. *** A lot of people say that. What specificly in defense would you cut? First off , EVERY system that the Pentagon says it doesn't need or want but which has been forced upon it by Congress.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #91 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote What part of "ALL" is the concept that you don't understand? What part of "voluntary contribution" is the concept that you don't understand? For someone that talks so much about the greed of others, you certainly show quite a bit of it, yourself. You really like looking foolish with your inability to use the language properly, don't you? You really like looking foolish with your inability to cover up your hypocrisy, don't you? Since you seem incapable of understanding, I'm NOT the wealthy one whining for more tax cuts. I would not benefit personally from my proposal (in fact I would lose). If you want greed, look to the Tea Party whiners, as well as Rick Perry and Herman Cain both of whom would benefit personally from their own proposals. Weaseling and attempting to misdirect, AGAIN? No, you're not the wealthy one whining for tax cuts, you're the wealthy one whining for more taxes while REFUSING to pay more when you have the opportunity. Enjoy your greed. Lame. Yeah, your misdirection attempts usually are. So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #92 October 28, 2011 Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #93 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine. Lame. The only person you fool is yourself.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #94 October 28, 2011 Quote Quote Quote So says Mr Rubber/Glue, who was caught out attempting to attribute to Muller and Trenberth opinions exactly opposite to those that they actually hold. Muller said what was quoted, and so did Trenberth...just because you THINK it was misattribution is YOUR problem, not mine. Lame. The only person you fool is yourself. Yes, that's why we laugh at your misdirection attempts....like this one.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Butters 0 #95 October 28, 2011 QuotePS fascinating that you think Jerry Bird "doesn't know much about skydiving". Kind of puts your opinions in perspective. There you go again making false statements ... you really are an arrogant, childish, insipid troll who appears to be growing in bitterness while shrinking in cognitive abilities."That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,182 #96 October 29, 2011 QuoteQuotePS fascinating that you think Jerry Bird "doesn't know much about skydiving". Kind of puts your opinions in perspective. There you go again making false statements ... you really are an arrogant, childish, insipid troll who appears to be growing in bitterness while shrinking in cognitive abilities. You wrote it.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
