0
stevebabin

Answers in Genesis

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

Quote

Put another way, prove invisible elves do not exist - and aren't stealing the produce from my garden at night. Not possible. However, if I claimed such events were happening, I'd have no credence whatsoever unless I could show evidentiary proof.



I'll tell you what...If you can get, like...lets say, um...practically the whole freaking world as witnesses of kleptomaniac elves, you might have a point.



So when there are more muslims than christians you'll convert?



*In cousin Balki voice*

Of course not, don't be ridiculous...
Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Put another way, prove invisible elves do not exist - and aren't stealing the produce from my garden at night. Not possible. However, if I claimed such events were happening, I'd have no credence whatsoever unless I could show evidentiary proof.



I'll tell you what...If you can get, like...lets say, um...practically the whole freaking world as witnesses of kleptomaniac elves, you might have a point.



Argumentum ad Populum. Classical fallacy, definitive nonsense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Why? Christianity doesn't live up to that criteria. No religion does.



We're talking about the idea of God...where the journey starts.




There are so many different ideas of god, past and present. Your claim doesn't even come close to making any sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Put another way, prove invisible elves do not exist - and aren't stealing the produce from my garden at night. Not possible. However, if I claimed such events were happening, I'd have no credence whatsoever unless I could show evidentiary proof.



I'll tell you what...If you can get, like...lets say, um...practically the whole freaking world as witnesses of kleptomaniac elves, you might have a point.



Argumentum ad Populum. Classical fallacy, definitive nonsense.



*yawn*
Argumentum blah blah blah, it's getting old naugler...we're talking about faith.

Even invoking Godwin does not negate the validity of the comparison.
Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Why? Christianity doesn't live up to that criteria. No religion does.



We're talking about the idea of God...where the journey starts.




There are so many different ideas of god, past and present. Your claim doesn't even come close to making any sense.



You'd be suprised how similar they are...

Truth is truth at all times and in all places.
Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

So you are saying all gods are the same? Everyone who worships a god is really worshiping the same god??



Quit shoving your words that reek of halitosis in my mouth...I can't stand the taste.
Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The problem with that argument is that faith is belief without proof.
Faith is trusting that God exists without a need for him to have created the universe.

To be fair, that's just the modern bastardization of faith's definition. As far as OT/NT is concerned, faith is synonymous with trust, no blind belief. And that trust was built on, "Look with your eyes at the what's been done before, what you know is true, etc. and *trust* that I (God) will deliver". God throughout both the OT/NT narrative has been pretty consistent about offering evidence that He is trustworthy, and is pretty big on "Don't follow / believe something blindly." The whole point of miracles and prophecy was to identify true prophets from false ones. After all, if the standard was "No proof, you just have to believe" you could say anything you wanted. You might not agree with the ultimate conclusion / belief system that God exists in any form, but as for the OT/NT narrative, it's pretty clear that faith is not the blind, irrational belief people like to label it today.
You stop breathing for a few minutes and everyone jumps to conclusions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

So you are saying all gods are the same? Everyone who worships a god is really worshiping the same god??



Quit shoving your words that reek of halitosis in my mouth...I can't stand the taste.




I am just trying to understand what you are saying. And that is what you seem to be saying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Put another way, prove invisible elves do not exist - and aren't stealing the produce from my garden at night. Not possible. However, if I claimed such events were happening, I'd have no credence whatsoever unless I could show evidentiary proof.



I'll tell you what...If you can get, like...lets say, um...practically the whole freaking world as witnesses of kleptomaniac elves, you might have a point.



Argumentum ad Populum. Classical fallacy, definitive nonsense.



*yawn*
Argumentum blah blah blah, it's getting old naugler...we're talking about faith.

Even invoking Godwin does not negate the validity of the comparison.



Faith != belief.

One can have faith without being a believer.

If you have faith that your parachute will open, that's great, but it does not necessarily entail belief.

If you want to say "I believe this with every fiber of my being," that may well be true.

Claiming that your belief has any effect on what is or is not true is another issue altogether.

The number of people who adhere to patent nonsense has nothing to do with its being patent nonsense.

If you want to claim that X number of people believing in something or another in any way proves its veracity, examples of the invalidity of such pseudo-logic are legion.

Take an introductory Logic course and get back to me.


BSBD,

Winsor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

So you are saying all gods are the same? Everyone who worships a god is really worshiping the same god??



Quit shoving your words that reek of halitosis in my mouth...I can't stand the taste.




I am just trying to understand what you are saying. And that is what you seem to be saying.



Well I'm happy to help you through your process of elimination...perhaps I should've made it multiple choice?

...nah, that's no fun.
Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I don't know why anyone continues to argue with Coreece ... he's either a chat bot or a troll. The sooner everyone stops responding the sooner it will go away.



I am human, you are the chat bot...;)
Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

So you are saying all gods are the same? Everyone who worships a god is really worshiping the same god??



Quit shoving your words that reek of halitosis in my mouth...I can't stand the taste.




I am just trying to understand what you are saying. And that is what you seem to be saying.



Well I'm happy to help you through your process of elimination...perhaps I should've made it multiple choice?

...nah, that's no fun.




So you either can't or won't clarify what you said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

So you are saying all gods are the same? Everyone who worships a god is really worshiping the same god??



Quit shoving your words that reek of halitosis in my mouth...I can't stand the taste.




I am just trying to understand what you are saying. And that is what you seem to be saying.



Well I'm happy to help you through your process of elimination...perhaps I should've made it multiple choice?

...nah, that's no fun.




So you either can't or won't clarify what you said.



May your journey begin, son:

http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=4187960;search_string=sought%20wisdom;#4187960

Godspeed...
Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You just blew your credibility.
You do realize that asking for "proof" of the existence of God is THE lamest argument EVER?
The counter is, "prove that he DOESN'T exist" which is just as lame.

Do you see this as a legitimate request for proof?:
Can you prove that you'll never hit your significant other?
How could you possibly prove that at this time?



You fail to realise that "prove it is" and "prove it isn't" are two very different propositions.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Why? Christianity doesn't live up to that criteria. No religion does.



We're talking about the idea of God...where the journey starts.



Up until about 1 or 2 hundred years ago the vast, vast majority of humans on the planet would have believed in some form of mischievous supernatural creatures (where the journey to kleptomaniac elves starts) living near to and secretly interacting with them. Outside of western society (where those beliefs are by no means extinct) most people probably still do. Your 'number of believers' argument carries no water at all.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You do realize that asking for "proof" of the existence of God is THE lamest argument EVER?
The counter is, "prove that he DOESN'T exist" which is just as lame.



Quote

Revisit Logic 101.


Nice work on Logic101.
Trying to apply it to this argument is tough, if not impossible.

People are asking for empirical proof of the metaphysical.
Two different animals....and lame to even ask.
Can YOU show physical proof of any metaphysical event?
My reality and yours are quite different.
I think we're all Bozos on this bus.
Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

You do realize that asking for "proof" of the existence of God is THE lamest argument EVER?
The counter is, "prove that he DOESN'T exist" which is just as lame.



Quote

Revisit Logic 101.


Nice work on Logic101.
Trying to apply it to this argument is tough, if not impossible.

People are asking for empirical proof of the metaphysical.
Two different animals....and lame to even ask.
Can YOU show physical proof of any metaphysical event?



Your problem is you are assuming the metaphysical actually exists. There isn't any evidence to support that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>the whole freaking world as witnesses of kleptomaniac elves, you might have a point.

Exactly. Elves who steal stuff. That's absurd.

Now, talking donkeys and snakes are perfectly reasonable, of course.



It's not so much about the talking donkey himself, but rather what the talking donkey says.

kleptomaniac elves provide no wisdom whatsoever...
Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

The problem with that argument is that faith is belief without proof.
Faith is trusting that God exists without a need for him to have created the universe.

To be fair, that's just the modern bastardization of faith's definition. As far as OT/NT is concerned, faith is synonymous with trust, no blind belief. And that trust was built on, "Look with your eyes at the what's been done before, what you know is true, etc. and *trust* that I (God) will deliver". God throughout both the OT/NT narrative has been pretty consistent about offering evidence that He is trustworthy, and is pretty big on "Don't follow / believe something blindly." The whole point of miracles and prophecy was to identify true prophets from false ones. After all, if the standard was "No proof, you just have to believe" you could say anything you wanted. You might not agree with the ultimate conclusion / belief system that God exists in any form, but as for the OT/NT narrative, it's pretty clear that faith is not the blind, irrational belief people like to label it today.



There's a big difference between having faith without solid proof and blind, irrational faith based on "No evidence whatsoever, just believe what I say."

Science has demonstrated pretty well that the processes for creating the universe don't require God to have done it.

There is no proof, either legal/courtroom (beyond a reasonable doubt) or scientific (repeatable through experimatiation/demonstration) that God exists.

None.

I have faith that God exists, due to things I have experienced and seen.
Miracles if you will. Small ones to be sure, but miracles nonetheless (to me anyway). Purely subjective, not scientific and probably not capable of convincing anyone else, at least those who don't want to be.
And that's ok.

I have that faith. Not blindly, but based on trusting in God

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YujYTVQ4_S0

Skip to 1:25 to find the best definition of "Miracle" I know.
"There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy

"~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0